Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Protecting Individual Liberty

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Protecting Individual Liberty"— Presentation transcript:

1 Protecting Individual Liberty
CIVIL LIBERTIES: Protecting Individual Liberty

2 Limits on Individual Rights
Can states limit the sale of alcoholic beverages and tobacco, make laws to combat pollution, and require vaccination of school children? Yes! Can states forbid concealed weapons, require the use of seat belts, and punish drunk drivers? Yes

3 Limits on Individual Rights
Can states outlaw gambling, the sale of obscene materials, and the practice of prostitution? Yes Can states enact compulsory education laws, provide medical help to the needy, and limit profits to public utilities?

4 Limits on Individual Rights
May police use unnecessary force? No May the state operate a private school? May the mayor ban a demonstration because he disagrees with the protesters?

5 DUE PROCESS 5th Amendment 14th Amendment
of law means The government must follow proper procedures in trials and in other actions it takes against individuals.

6 Due Process of Law! The 5th Amendment The 14th Amendment
Federal government can’t take away your life, liberty, or property without due process of law! The 14th Amendment extends the same due process protection to individuals from state governments!

7 The Bill of Rights The Bill of Rights protections apply to Federal Law only! The Bill of Rights, however is extended to cover states under the due process clause of the 14th Amendment!

8 Selective Incorporation
Process by which the Supreme Court has applied the protections of the Bill of Rights to the states through the 14th Amendment

9 The 4th Amendment : Searches and Seizures
Protected against unreasonable searches and seizures The police have no general right to search for evidence or to seize either evidence or persons unless they have a proper warrant obtained with “probable cause”!

10 No Warrant Needed When:
If you give consent If police see you break the law Evidence is in plain view Emergency situations If there is potential that evidence can be moved or destroyed, no warrant is needed.

11 Schmerber v. California (1966)
Schmerber was forced to take a blood test to determine if he was DWI The blood test was given by a doctor on police orders but without a search warrant Legal or Illegal? Legal the officer had reasonable suspicion a doctor performed the test, and had time been taken to obtain a search warrant, the alcohol would have left Schmerber’s system!

12 Automobiles & other vehicles
A movable crime scene can be searched without a warrant but an officer must have… “Probable Cause”! Roadside check points that randomly check for intoxication are… Legal! Hi-Life

13 What about a trunk in the trunk?
What about the glove compartment, the trunk, a paper bag, a piece of luggage or other closed container? If the car is lawfully stopped any search is legal under… “Probable Cause”

14 From the courts to the police, as you enforce the law obey the law!!!!
The Exclusionary Rule Evidence illegally obtained by police cannot be used against you Weeks v. US 1914 Exclusionary rule applies in Federal Cases Mapp v. Ohio 1961 Exclusionary rule applies to STATES From the courts to the police, as you enforce the law obey the law!!!!

15 Mandatory Drug Testing
May employers require a drug test after an accident at work? May random drug tests be required in some jobs? May a drug test be required as a part of an application process for a job? YES!

16 4th Amendment & Schools New Jersey v. TLO (1985) Court ruled…
Student was suspected of smoking in the bathroom and school administrator searched her purse without warrant Drugs found in the purse Court ruled… School acted with reasonable suspicion and, therefore, did not need a warrant

17 School officials do not have the same restrictions as police officers

18 5th Amendment Protects: Right to a grand jury No “double jeopardy”
Self-incrimination Due process of law Private property

19 5th Amendment: Double Jeopardy
Once tried for a crime a person can not be tried for the same crime again! A crime may violate state and federal laws and a person can then be tried in both state and federal court without violation of their protection from double jeopardy! Double jeopardy does not prevent a person convicted of a crime from appealing a conviction!

20 5th Amendment: Self-incrimination
You may not be forced to testify against yourself A refusal to answer on the grounds of self-incrimination works in courtrooms but not assistant principal’s offices! You can be compelled to testify (RAT ON) against a friend!

21 Limits on Self-incrimination
You can be finger printed, photographed, tested for drugs or alcohol. You can be put in a lineup. You can be questioned but a forced confession or one gained by threat is illegal!

22 Miranda v. Arizona (1966) Ernesto Miranda was arrested for rape and kidnapping. The victim selected him from a lineup, and the police questioned him for 2 hours. He was NOT told that he could remain silent or that he could have a lawyer. He confessed, signed a statement, and was convicted. Then he appealed.

23 Miranda v. Arizona (1966) Does the police practice of interrogating individuals without notifiying them of their right to counsel and their protection against self-incrimination violate the Fifth Amendment? YES!

24 Miranda Rights Before a suspect may be questioned that suspect must be read their rights Miranda applies only to felonies, not minor offenses such as misdemeanors!

25 Reading the Rights to the Accused:
You have the right to remain silent. If you choose to speak, anything you say may be used against you in a court of law or other proceeding. You have the right to consult with a lawyer before answering any questions and you may have a lawyer present during questioning. If you cannot afford a lawyer and you want one, a lawyer will be provided for you by the state without cost to you. Do you understand what I have told you? You may also waive the right to counsel and your right to remain silent and you may answer any question or make any statement you wish. If you decide to answer questions you may stop at any time to consult with a lawyer.

26 You have the right to remain silent.
Anything you say or do can and will be held against you in a court of law. You have the right to speak to an attorney. If you cannot afford an attorney, one will be appointed for you. Do you understand these rights as they have been read to you?

27 6th Amendment: Trial Rights
Speedy Trial Public Trial Impartial Jury Adequate defense --Lawyer 6th Amendment: Trial Rights

28 6th Amendment: Trial Rights
Speedy Trial No more than 100 days from arrest to trial Public Trial Limits may be set on spectators, people may be removed, courtrooms may be cleared TV may be allowed or barred, a defendant’s rights come first! Trial by an impartial Jury A defendant may waive this right and accept a bench trial 6th Amendment: Trial Rights

29 The 6th Amendment: Right to an Adequate Defense
To be informed of the crime to which you have been charged To confront witnesses against you To have witnesses to testify for you To have an attorney’s assistance Both State and Federal Courts must honor these rights!

30 If you can not afford an attorney, one will be provided for you!
Gideon v. Wainwright (1963) Gideon accused of robbery in Florida was too poor to hire a lawyer and was forced to defend himself. Gideon was convicted but appealed his State conviction to the Supreme Court which ruled… If you can not afford an attorney, one will be provided for you!

31 The Supreme Court took this case on appeal and ruled…
Escobedo v. Illinois (1964) Danny Escobedo while being taken to the police station for questioning and while being questioned repeatedly asked to see his lawyer and was denied the request! Under intense questioning in a murder case that went on for hours, Escobedo made damaging statements that were used to convict in his trial! The Supreme Court took this case on appeal and ruled… Danny Escobedo’s rights had been violated and he was ordered released from jail!!

32 8th Amendment Protects you FROM: Cruel and Unusual punishment
Excessive bail or fines

33 8th Amendment: No Excessive Fines or Bail
A sum of money the accused is required to post as a guarantee that they will show up for trial. Justification for Bail The accused should not be jailed until convicted Defendants are better able to prepare their defense out of jail

34 The 8th Amendment bans Cruel and Unusual Punishments

35 What kinds of punishment are banned?
Burning at the stake Crucifixion Drawing and Quartering Whippings Slavery

36 If at first you don’t succeed, try, try again!
Louisiana v. Resweber (1947) Louisiana was allowed a second attempt at executing Resweber after the chair failed on their first try The chair worked just fine on their second attempt It’s not cruel and unusual to try until you succeed Florida’s “Old Sparky” 39 Criminals

37 Three Strike Rules YES! Three felony convictions = Life Imprisonment!
Rummel v. Estelle (1980) Was it legal to sentence Rummel to life in prison for three petty thefts of property worth $230 in total? YES!

38 Capital Punishment The death penalty may be cruel but it is not unusual 32 states allow capital punishment To be legal a capital case must have two phases: Trial and Conviction Sentencing

39 8th Amendment: Punishment
W

40 Capital Punishment Furman v. Georgia (1972)
Court declares Georgia’s death penalty law is unconstitutional because there is not set procedure in place for applying the death penalty Used more often for poor and minorities

41 Capital Punishment Gregg v. Georgia (1976)
Court declared the new Georgia death penalty law constitutional because there is now a procedure for juries to follow when assigning the death sentence

42 Capital Punishment If a criminal is insane, they can not be executed!
Ford v. Wainwright (1986) The court may order the insane criminal treated and cured then can order an execution!!

43 Capital Punishment If a criminal is 15 years old at the time they commit a murder, they can not be executed The court did order the execution of 16 and 17 year olds who had committed murder Thompson v. Oklahoma, Wilkins v. Missouri, and Stanford v. Kentucky

44 Capital and Other Punishments
Can the jury in a capital case hear from the victim’s family? Do the feelings of the victims family matter? May the victim’s family’s wishes be considered in sentencing a criminal? YES!


Download ppt "Protecting Individual Liberty"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google