Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byBrecht Bosman Modified over 6 years ago
1
05/11/2012 Experimental Leaching of Bedrock and Fluvial Sediments: Implications for Continental Runoff K.M. Deuerling, E.E. Martin, J.B. Martin, G.D. Kamenov University of Florida, Department of Geological Sciences Geological Society of America Fall Meeting, 5 November 2012
2
Motivation: Oceanic Sediments
05/11/2012 Motivation: Oceanic Sediments Modified from Kurzweil et al. 2010 warmer colder Radiogenic Pb and Weathering 238U 206Pb 235U 207Pb 232Th 208Pb Radiogenic Pb isotopes normalized to 204Pb (nonradiogenic) Elevated 206,207,208Pb/204Pb indicates weathering of “fresh” material Continental weathering seawater Pb signature Radiogenic Pb 18O data is ice core data Squiggles have been attributed to changes in chemical and physical weathering regimes Have never been compared to land-based records
3
Motivation: Land-based Chronosequences
05/11/2012 Motivation: Land-based Chronosequences Harlavan et al. 1998 Leached fraction more radiogenic than bulk soil values Leached fraction approaches bulk values over time
4
Question Significance
05/11/2012 Question How do radiogenic isotope ratios vary between different weathering environments in glacial forelands? Significance Initial evaluation of the importance of fluvial weathering environment on continental runoff signature Identification of distinct isotopic signatures in proglacial and deglaciated weathering environments
5
Glacial Foreland Stream Morphology
Proglacial Streams Predominantly glacial melt Deglaciated Streams Predominantly local precipitation ↑ discharge ↑ suspended sediment load ↓ discharge ↓ suspended sediment load
6
Glacial Foreland Stream Morphology
(Mernild et al. 2010) ~50% of melt near Kangerlussuaq is derived from deglaciated watersheds
7
Rock/Sediment Sample Collection Sites
05/11/2012 Rock/Sediment Sample Collection Sites ~20 km from coast 2 rock types (granite, gneiss) 2 proglacial, 1 deglaciated sediment samples Google Earth
8
Experiment I: 24-Hour HCl Leach
05/11/2012 Experiment I: 24-Hour HCl Leach
9
Water Sample Collection Sites
05/11/2012 Water Sample Collection Sites (PG 1-1) (PG 1-2) (DG 1-2) (DG 1-1) (PG 2-2) Five water samples taken for radiogenic isotope analysis 3 proglacial, 2 deglaciated Google Earth
10
Initial Data: Ilulissat Water Samples
05/11/2012 Initial Data: Ilulissat Water Samples
11
Initial Data: Ilulissat Water Samples
05/11/2012 Initial Data: Ilulissat Water Samples (PG 1-1) (DG 1-1) (DG 1-2) (PG 1-2) (PG 2-2) (PG 1-1) (PG 1-2) (DG 1-2) (DG 1-1) (PG 2-2) Anthropogenic Pb input to deglaciated watersheds? Downstream input of deglaciated water into proglacial watershed mixed source signal
12
05/11/2012 Conclusions Proglacial and deglaciated leaching experiments indicate that sediments in the field area are relatively “new” and unweathered Water samples demonstrate disparate isotope fields for proglacial and deglaciated streams Proglacial headwaters subglacial signal? Mixing/integrated signal over path length Once scaled up, should be able to use the information to validate the marine records, or to look at more pertinent fjord cores
13
05/11/2012 Future Work Analyze leachates, residuals, and bulk rock/sediment for radiogenic Sr and Nd Widespread sampling expedition from Kangerlussuaq to Sisimiut, West Greenland scheduled for Summer 2012 Google Earth
14
Questions? Acknowledgments
This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellowship under Grant No. DGE Funding also provided by the University of Florida Faculty Enhancement Opportunity awarded to J. Martin
15
Experiment I: 24-Hour HCl Leach
05/11/2012 Experiment I: 24-Hour HCl Leach
16
Experiment II: 5-Day HCl Leach
05/11/2012 Experiment II: 5-Day HCl Leach
17
Experiment II: 5-Day HCl Leach
05/11/2012 Experiment II: 5-Day HCl Leach
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.