1. 22
The Origin of Species

2. Overview: That “Mystery of Mysteries”
In the Galápagos Islands Darwin discovered plants and animals found nowhere else on Earth
Animation: Macroevolution 2

3. Figure 22.1
Figure 22.1 How did this flightless bird come to live on the isolated Galápagos Islands? 3

4. Speciation is the process by which one species splits into two or more species
Speciation explains the features shared between organisms due to inheritance from their recent common ancestor 4

5. Speciation forms a conceptual bridge between microevolution and macroevolution
Microevolution consists of changes in allele frequency in a population over time
Macroevolution refers to broad patterns of evolutionary change above the species level 5

6. Concept 22.1: The biological species concept emphasizes reproductive isolation
Species is a Latin word meaning “kind” or “appearance”
Biologists compare morphology, physiology, biochemistry, and DNA sequences when grouping organisms 6

7. The Biological Species Concept
The biological species concept states that a species is a group of populations whose members have the potential to interbreed in nature and produce viable, fertile offspring; they do not breed successfully with other populations
Gene flow between populations holds the populations together genetically 7

8. (a) Similarity between different species
Figure 22.2
Figure 22.2 The biological species concept is based on the potential to interbreed rather than on physical similarity
(a) Similarity between different species
(b) Diversity within a species 8

9. (a) Similarity between different species
Figure 22.2a
Figure 22.2a The biological species concept is based on the potential to interbreed rather than on physical similarity (part 1: similarity)
(a) Similarity between different species 9

10. Figure 22.2aa
Figure 22.2aa The biological species concept is based on the potential to interbreed rather than on physical similarity (part 1a: Eastern meadowlark) 10

11. Figure 22.2ab
Figure 22.2ab The biological species concept is based on the potential to interbreed rather than on physical similarity (part 1b: Western meadowlark) 11

12. (b) Diversity within a species
Figure 22.2b
Figure 22.2b The biological species concept is based on the potential to interbreed rather than on physical similarity (part 2: diversity)
(b) Diversity within a species 12

13. Figure 22.2ba
Figure 22.2ba The biological species concept is based on the potential to interbreed rather than on physical similarity (part 2a) 13

14. Figure 22.2bb
Figure 22.2bb The biological species concept is based on the potential to interbreed rather than on physical similarity (part 2b) 14

15. Figure 22.2bc
Figure 22.2bc The biological species concept is based on the potential to interbreed rather than on physical similarity (part 2c) 15

16. Figure 22.2bd
Figure 22.2bd The biological species concept is based on the potential to interbreed rather than on physical similarity (part 2d) 16

17. Figure 22.2be
Figure 22.2be The biological species concept is based on the potential to interbreed rather than on physical similarity (part 2e) 17

18. Figure 22.2bf
Figure 22.2bf The biological species concept is based on the potential to interbreed rather than on physical similarity (part 2f) 18

19. Reproductive Isolation
Reproductive isolation is the existence of biological barriers that impede two species from producing viable, fertile offspring
Hybrids are the offspring of crosses between different species
Reproductive isolation can be classified by whether barriers act before or after fertilization 19

20. Video: Albatross Courtship
Video: Tortoise
Video: Albatross Courtship
Video: Blue-footed Boobies Courtship Ritual
Video: Giraffe Courtship 20

21. Figure 22.3
Prezygotic barriers
Postzygotic barriers
Habitat
isolation
Temporal
isolation
Behavioral
isolation
Mechanical
isolation
Gametic
isolation
Reduced
hybrid
viability
Reduced
hybrid
fertility
Hybrid
breakdown
VIABLE,
FERTILE
OFF-
SPRING
MATING
ATTEMPT
FERTILI-
ZATION
(a)
(c)
(e)
(f)
(g)
(h)
(i)
(l)
(d)
(j)
(b)
Figure 22.3 Exploring reproductive barriers
(k) 21

22. Prezygotic barriers block fertilization from occurring by
Impeding different species from attempting to mate
Preventing the successful completion of mating
Hindering fertilization if mating is successful 22

23. Habitat isolation Temporal isolation Behavioral isolation
Figure 22.3a
Prezygotic barriers
Habitat
isolation
Temporal
isolation
Behavioral
isolation
MATING
ATTEMPT
(a)
(c)
(e)
Figure 22.3a Exploring reproductive barriers (part 1: prezygotic barriers)
(d)
(b) 23

24. Habitat isolation: Two species encounter each other rarely, or not at all, because they occupy different habitats, even though not isolated by physical barriers 24

25. Figure 22.3aa
(a)
Figure 22.3aa Exploring reproductive barriers (part 1a: habitat isolation, water) 25

26. Figure 22.3ab
(b)
Figure 22.3ab Exploring reproductive barriers (part 1b: habitat isolation, terrestrial) 26

27. Temporal isolation: Species that breed at different times of the day, different seasons, or different years cannot mix their gametes 27

28. Figure 22.3ac
(c)
Figure 22.2ac Exploring reproductive barriers (part 1c: temporal isolation, winter) 28

29. Figure 22.3ad
(d)
Figure 22.2ad Exploring reproductive barriers (part 1d: temporal isolation, summer) 29

30. Behavioral isolation: Courtship rituals and other behaviors unique to a species are effective barriers 30

31. Figure 22.3ae
(e)
Figure 22.ae Exploring reproductive barriers (part 1e: behavioral isolation) 31

32. Mechanical isolation Gametic isolation
Figure 22.3b
Prezygotic barriers
Mechanical
isolation
Gametic
isolation
MATING
ATTEMPT
FERTILIZATION
(f)
(g)
Figure 22.3b Exploring reproductive barriers (part 2: prezygotic barriers) 32

33. Mechanical isolation: Morphological differences prevent successful mating33

34. Figure 22.3bf
(f)
Figure 22.3bf Exploring reproductive barriers (part 2f: mechanical isolation) 34

35. Gametic isolation: Sperm of one species may not be able to fertilize eggs of another species35

36. Figure 22.3bg
(g)
Figure 22.3bg Exploring reproductive barriers (part 2g: gametic isolation) 36

37. Postzygotic barriers prevent the hybrid zygote from developing into a viable, fertile adult by
Reduced hybrid viability
Reduced hybrid fertility
Hybrid breakdown 37

38. Reduced hybrid viability Reduced hybrid fertility Hybrid breakdown
Figure 22.3c
Postzygotic barriers
Reduced
hybrid
viability
Reduced
hybrid
fertility
Hybrid
breakdown
VIABLE,
FERTILE
OFFSPRING
FERTILIZATION
(h)
(i)
(l)
(j)
Figure 22.3c Exploring reproductive barriers (part 3: postzygotic barriers)
(k) 38

39. Reduced hybrid viability: Genes of the different parent species may interact and impair the hybrid’s development or survival 39

40. Figure 22.3ch
(h)
Figure 22.3ch Exploring reproductive barriers (part 3h: reduced hybrid viability) 40

41. Reduced hybrid fertility: Even if hybrids are vigorous, they may be sterile41

42. Figure 22.3ci
(i)
Figure 22.3ci Exploring reproductive barriers (part 3i: reduced hybrid fertility) 42

43. Figure 22.3cj
(j)
Figure 22.3cj Exploring reproductive barriers (part 3j: reduced hybrid fertility) 43

44. Figure 22.3ck
(k)
Figure 22.3ck Exploring reproductive barriers (part 3k: reduced hybrid fertility) 44

45. Hybrid breakdown: Some first-generation hybrids are fertile, but when they mate with another species or with either parent species, offspring of the next generation are feeble or sterile 45

46. Figure 22.3cl
(l)
Figure 22.3cl Exploring reproductive barriers (part 3l: hybrid breakdown) 46

47. Prezygotic barriers Habitat isolation Temporal isolation Behavioral
Figure 22.3d
Prezygotic
barriers
Habitat
isolation
Temporal
isolation
Behavioral
isolation
MATING
ATTEMPT
Mechanical
isolation
Gametic
isolation
MATING
ATTEMPT
FERTILIZATION
Figure 22.3d Exploring reproductive barriers (part 4: art summary)
Postzygotic
barriers
Reduced
hybrid
viability
Reduced
hybrid
fertility
Hybrid
breakdown
VIABLE,
FERTILE
OFFSPRING
FERTILIZATION 47

48. Limitations of the Biological Species Concept
The biological species concept cannot be applied to fossils or asexual organisms (including all prokaryotes)
The biological species concept emphasizes absence of gene flow
However, gene flow can occur between distinct species
For example, grizzly bears and polar bears can mate to produce “grolar bears” 48

49. Grizzly bear (U. arctos) Polar bear (U. maritimus)
Figure 22.4
Grizzly bear (U. arctos)
Figure 22.4 Hybridization between two species of bears in the genus Ursus
Hybrid “grolar bear”
Polar bear (U. maritimus) 49

50. Grizzly bear (U. arctos)
Figure 22.4a
Figure 22.4a Hybridization between two species of bears in the genus Ursus (part 1: grizzly)
Grizzly bear (U. arctos) 50

51. Polar bear (U. maritimus)
Figure 22.4b
Figure 22.4b Hybridization between two species of bears in the genus Ursus (part 2: polar)
Polar bear (U. maritimus) 51

52. Hybrid “grolar bear” Figure 22.4c
Figure 22.4c Hybridization between two species of bears in the genus Ursus (part 3: “grolar”)
Hybrid “grolar bear” 52

53. Other Definitions of Species
Other species concepts emphasize the unity within a species rather than the separateness of different species
The morphological species concept defines a species by structural features
It applies to sexual and asexual species but relies on subjective criteria 53

54. The ecological species concept views a species in terms of its ecological niche
It applies to sexual and asexual species and emphasizes the role of disruptive selection
The phylogenetic species concept defines a species as the smallest group of individuals on a phylogenetic tree
It applies to sexual and asexual species, but it can be difficult to determine the degree of difference required for separate species 54

55. Concept 22.2: Speciation can take place with or without geographic separation
Speciation can occur in two ways
Allopatric speciation
Sympatric speciation 55

56. Allopatric speciation: forms a new species while
Figure 22.5
Figure 22.5 Two main modes of speciation
Allopatric speciation: forms
a new species while
geographically isolated.
(a)
(b)
Sympatric speciation: a subset
forms a new species without
geographic separation. 56

57. Allopatric (“Other Country”) Speciation
In allopatric speciation, gene flow is interrupted when a population is divided into geographically isolated subpopulations
For example, the flightless cormorant of the Galápagos likely originated from a flying species on the mainland 57

58. The Process of Allopatric Speciation
The definition of a geographic barrier depends on the ability of a population to disperse
For example, a canyon may create a barrier for small rodents, but not birds, coyotes, or pollen 58

59. Reproductive isolation may arise as a result of genetic divergence
Separate populations may evolve independently through mutation, natural selection, and genetic drift
Reproductive isolation may arise as a result of genetic divergence
For example, mosquitofish in the Bahamas comprise several isolated populations in different ponds 59

60. body shape that enables rapid bursts of speed (a) Under low predation:
Figure 22.6
Under high predation:
body shape that enables
rapid bursts of speed
(a)
Under low predation:
body shape that favors
long, steady swimming
(b)
Figure 22.6 Reproductive isolation as a by-product of selection 60

61. body shape that enables rapid bursts of speed (a)
Figure 22.6a
Under high predation:
body shape that enables
rapid bursts of speed
(a)
Figure 22.6a Reproductive isolation as a by-product of selection (part 1: under high predation) 61

62. Under low predation: body shape that favors long, steady swimming (b)
Figure 22.6b
Under low predation:
body shape that favors
long, steady swimming
(b)
Figure 22.6b Reproductive isolation as a by-product of selection (part 2: under low predation) 62

63. Evidence of Allopatric Speciation
Fifteen pairs of sister species of snapping shrimp (Alpheus) are separated by the Isthmus of Panama
These species originated from 9 million to 3 million years ago, when the Isthmus of Panama formed and separated the Atlantic and Pacific waters 63

64. A. formosus A. nuttingi ATLANTIC OCEAN Isthmus of Panama PACIFIC OCEAN
Figure 22.7
A. formosus
A. nuttingi
ATLANTIC
OCEAN
Isthmus of Panama
PACIFIC
OCEAN
Figure 22.7 Allopatric speciation in snapping shrimp (Alpheus)
A. panamensis
A. millsae 64

65. Figure 22.7a
Figure 22.7a Allopatric speciation in snapping shrimp (Alpheus) (part 1a: A. formosus)
A. formosus 65

66. Figure 22.7b
Figure 22.7b Allopatric speciation in snapping shrimp (Alpheus) (part 1b: A. nuttingi)
A. nuttingi 66

67. Figure 22.7c
Figure 22.7c Allopatric speciation in snapping shrimp (Alpheus) (part 1c: A. panamensis)
A. panamensis 67

68. Figure 22.7d
Figure 22.7d Allopatric speciation in snapping shrimp (Alpheus) (part 1d: A. millsae)
A. millsae 68

69. Regions with many geographic barriers typically have more species than do regions with fewer barriers
Reproductive isolation between populations generally increases as the geographic distance between them increases 69

70. Barriers to reproduction are intrinsic; separation itself is not a biological barrier
Intrinsic reproductive barriers can develop in experimentally isolated populations 70

71. Initial population of fruit flies (Drosophila pseudoobscura)
Figure 22.8
Experiment
Initial population
of fruit flies
(Drosophila
pseudoobscura)
Some flies raised
on starch medium
Some flies raised
on maltose medium
Mating experiments
after 40 generations
Results
Female
Female
Starch
population 1
Starch
population 2
Starch
Maltose
Figure 22.8 Inquiry: Can divergence of allopatric populations lead to reproductive isolation?
Starch
population 1
Starch 22 9 18 15
Male
Male
population 2
Starch
Maltose 8 20 12 15
Number of matings
in experimental group
Number of matings
in control group 71

72. Experiment Initial population of fruit flies (Drosophila
Figure 22.8a
Experiment
Initial population
of fruit flies
(Drosophila
pseudoobscura)
Some flies raised
on starch medium
Some flies raised
on maltose medium
Figure 22.8a Inquiry: Can divergence of allopatric populations lead to reproductive isolation? (part 1: experiment)
Mating experiments
after 40 generations 72

73. Number of matings in experimental group Number of matings
Figure 22.8b
Results
Female
Female
Starch
population 1
Starch
population 2
Starch
Maltose
population 1
Starch
Starch 22 9 18 15
Male
Male
population 2
Starch
Maltose
Figure 22.8b Inquiry: Can divergence of allopatric populations lead to reproductive isolation? (part 2: results) 8 20 12 15
Number of matings
in experimental group
Number of matings
in control group 73

74. Sympatric (“Same Country”) Speciation
In sympatric speciation, speciation takes place in populations that live in the same geographic area
Sympatric speciation occurs when gene flow is reduced between groups that remain in contact through factors including
Polyploidy
Habitat differentiation
Sexual selection 74

75. Polyploidy
Polyploidy is the presence of extra sets of chromosomes due to accidents during cell division
Polyploidy is much more common in plants than in animals
An autopolyploid is an individual with more than two chromosome sets, derived from one species
The offspring of matings between autopolyploids and diploids have reduced fertility 75

76. Tetraploid cell 4n  12 New species (4n)
Figure 22.UN01
Cell
division
error
2n  6
Tetraploid cell
4n  12
Figure 22.UN01 In-text figure, autopolyploid, p. 425 2n
New species
(4n)
Gametes produced
by tetraploids 76

77. Allopolyploids cannot interbreed with either parent species
An allopolyploid is a species with multiple sets of chromosomes derived from different species
Allopolyploids cannot interbreed with either parent species 77

78. Meiotic error; chromosome number not reduced from 2n to n
Figure
Species A
2n  6
Species B
2n  4
Meiotic error; chromosome
number not reduced from 2n to n
Normal
gamete
n  3
Unreduced gamete
with 4 chromosomes
Figure One mechanism for allopolyploid speciation in plants (step 1) 78

79. Meiotic error; chromosome number not reduced from 2n to n
Figure
Species A
2n  6
Species B
2n  4
Meiotic error; chromosome
number not reduced from 2n to n
Normal
gamete
n  3
Unreduced gamete
with 4 chromosomes
Hybrid with
7 chromosomes
Figure One mechanism for allopolyploid speciation in plants (step 2) 79

80. Meiotic error; chromosome number not reduced from 2n to n
Figure
Species A
2n  6
Species B
2n  4
Meiotic error; chromosome
number not reduced from 2n to n
Normal
gamete
n  3
Unreduced gamete
with 4 chromosomes
Hybrid with
7 chromosomes
Figure One mechanism for allopolyploid speciation in plants (step 3)
Normal
gamete
n  3
Unreduced gamete
with 7 chromosomes 80

81. Meiotic error; chromosome number not reduced from 2n to n
Figure
Species A
2n  6
Species B
2n  4
Meiotic error; chromosome
number not reduced from 2n to n
Normal
gamete
n  3
Unreduced gamete
with 4 chromosomes
Hybrid with
7 chromosomes
Figure One mechanism for allopolyploid speciation in plants (step 4)
Normal
gamete
n  3
Unreduced gamete
with 7 chromosomes
New species:
viable fertile hybrid
(allopolyploid)
2n  10 81

82. Many important crops (oats, cotton, potatoes, tobacco, and wheat) are polyploids82

83. Habitat Differentiation
Sympatric speciation can also result from the appearance of new ecological niches
For example, the North American maggot fly can live on native hawthorn trees as well as more recently introduced apple trees 83

84. Sexual Selection Sexual selection can drive sympatric speciation
Sexual selection for mates of different colors has likely contributed to speciation in cichlid fish in Lake Victoria 84

85. Monochromatic orange light Normal light P. pundamilia
Figure 22.10
Experiment
Monochromatic
orange light
Normal light
P. pundamilia
Figure Inquiry: Does sexual selection in cichlids result in reproductive isolation?
P. nyererei 85

86. Normal light P. pundamilia
Figure 22.10a
Normal light
P. pundamilia
Figure 22.10a Inquiry: Does sexual selection in cichlids result in reproductive isolation? (part 1: P. pundamilia, normal) 86

87. Monochromatic orange light P. pundamilia
Figure 22.10b
Monochromatic
orange light
P. pundamilia
Figure 22.10b Inquiry: Does sexual selection in cichlids result in reproductive isolation? (part 2: P. pundamilia, monochromatic) 87

88. Normal light P. nyererei Figure 22.10c
Figure 22.10c Inquiry: Does sexual selection in cichlids result in reproductive isolation? (part 3: P. nyererei, normal) 88

89. Monochromatic orange light
Figure 22.10d
Monochromatic
orange light
P. nyererei
Figure 22.10d Inquiry: Does sexual selection in cichlids result in reproductive isolation? (part 4: P. nyererei, monochromatic) 89

90. Allopatric and Sympatric Speciation: A Review
In allopatric speciation, geographic isolation restricts gene flow between populations
Reproductive isolation may then arise by natural selection, genetic drift, or sexual selection in the isolated populations
Even if contact is restored between populations, interbreeding is prevented by reproductive barriers 90

91. In sympatric speciation, a reproductive barrier isolates a subset of a population without geographic separation from the parent species
Sympatric speciation can result from polyploidy, natural selection, or sexual selection 91

92. Concept 22.3: Hybrid zones reveal factors that cause reproductive isolation
A hybrid zone is a region in which members of different species mate and produce hybrids
Hybrids are the result of mating between species with incomplete reproductive barriers 92

93. Patterns Within Hybrid Zones
A hybrid zone can occur in a single band where adjacent species meet
For example, two species of toad in the genus Bombina interbreed in a long and narrow hybrid zone 93

94. B. variegata-specific allele Distance from hybrid zone center (km)
Figure 22.11
Fire-bellied
toad range
Fire-bellied toad, Bombina
bombina
Hybrid zone
Yellow-bellied
toad range
0.99
Hybrid
zone
0.9
Figure A narrow hybrid zone for Bombina toads in Europe
B. variegata-specific allele
Frequency of
0.5
Yellow-bellied
toad range
Fire-bellied
toad range
Yellow-bellied toad, Bombina
variegata
0.1
0.01 40 30 20 10 10 20
Distance from hybrid zone center (km) 94

95. Fire-bellied toad range
Figure 22.11a
Fire-bellied
toad range
Figure 22.11a A narrow hybrid zone for Bombina toads in Europe (part 1: map)
Hybrid zone
Yellow-bellied
toad range 95

96. B. variegata-specific allele Distance from hybrid zone center (km)
Figure 22.11b
0.99
Hybrid
zone
0.9
B. variegata-specific allele
Frequency of
0.5
Yellow-bellied
toad range
Fire-bellied
toad range
0.1
Figure 22.11b A narrow hybrid zone for Bombina toads in Europe (part 2: graph)
0.01 40 30 20 10 10 20
Distance from hybrid zone center (km) 96

97. Yellow-bellied toad, Bombina variegata Figure 22.11c
Figure 22.11c A narrow hybrid zone for Bombina toads in Europe (part 3: B. variegata) 97

98. Fire-bellied toad, Bombina bombina Figure 22.11d
Figure 22.11d A narrow hybrid zone for Bombina toads in Europe (part 4: B. bombina) 98

99. Hybrids often have reduced fitness compared with parent species
The distribution of hybrid zones can be more complex if parent species are found in patches within the same region 99

100. Hybrid Zones over Time
When closely related species meet in a hybrid zone, there are three possible outcomes
Reinforcement
Fusion
Stability
100

101. Gene flow Population Barrier to gene flow Figure 22.12-1
Figure Formation of a hybrid zone and possible outcomes for hybrids over time (step 1)
Population
Barrier to
gene flow
101

102. Isolated population diverges. Gene flow Population Barrier to
Figure
Isolated
population
diverges.
Gene flow
Figure Formation of a hybrid zone and possible outcomes for hybrids over time (step 2)
Population
Barrier to
gene flow
102

103. Isolated population diverges. Hybrid zone Gene flow Population
Figure
Isolated
population
diverges.
Hybrid
zone
Gene flow
Figure Formation of a hybrid zone and possible outcomes for hybrids over time (step 3)
Population
Barrier to
gene flow
Hybrid
individual
103

104. Isolated population diverges. Possible outcomes: Hybrid zone
Figure
Isolated
population
diverges.
Possible
outcomes:
Hybrid
zone
Reinforcement
Fusion
Gene flow
Figure Formation of a hybrid zone and possible outcomes for hybrids over time (step 4)
Population
Barrier to
gene flow
Hybrid
individual
Stability
104

105. Reinforcement occurs when hybrids are less fit than the parent species
Natural selection strengthens (reinforces) reproductive barriers, and, over time, the rate of hybridization decreases
Where reinforcement occurs, reproductive barriers should be stronger for sympatric than for allopatric species
105

106. This might be causing the fusion of many species
Fusion of the parent species into a single species may occur if hybrids are as fit as parents, allowing substantial gene flow between species
For example, researchers think that pollution in Lake Victoria has reduced the ability of female cichlids to distinguish males of different species
This might be causing the fusion of many species
106

107. Pundamilia pundamilia
Figure 22.13
Pundamilia nyererei
Pundamilia pundamilia
Figure Fusion: the breakdown of reproductive barriers
Pundamilia “turbid water,”
hybrid offspring from a
location with turbid water
107

108. Pundamilia nyererei Figure 22.13a
Figure 22.13a Fusion: the breakdown of reproductive barriers (part 1: P. nyererei)
Pundamilia nyererei
108

109. Pundamilia pundamilia
Figure 22.13b
Figure 22.13b Fusion: the breakdown of reproductive barriers (part 2: P. pundamilia)
Pundamilia pundamilia
109

110. Pundamilia “turbid water,” hybrid offspring from a location with
Figure 22.13c
Figure 22.13c Fusion: the breakdown of reproductive barriers (part 3: P. “turbid water”)
Pundamilia “turbid water,” hybrid
offspring from a location with
turbid water
110

111. In a stable hybrid zone, hybrids continue to be produced over time
Stability of the hybrid zone may be achieved if extensive gene flow from outside the hybrid zone can overwhelm selection for increased reproductive isolation inside the hybrid zone
In a stable hybrid zone, hybrids continue to be produced over time
111

112. Concept 22.4: Speciation can occur rapidly or slowly and can result from changes in few or many genes
Many questions remain concerning how long it takes for new species to form, or how many genes need to differ between species
112

113. The Time Course of Speciation
Broad patterns in speciation can be studied using the fossil record, morphological data, or molecular data
113

114. Patterns in the Fossil Record
The fossil record includes examples of species that appear suddenly, persist essentially unchanged for some time, and then apparently disappear
These periods of apparent stasis punctuated by sudden change are called punctuated equilibria
The punctuated equilibrium model contrasts with a model of gradual change in a species’ existence
114

115. (a) Punctuated model Time (b) Gradual model Figure 22.14
Figure Two models for the tempo of speciation, based on patterns observed in the fossil record
(b) Gradual model
115

116. Speciation Rates
The punctuated pattern in the fossil record and evidence from lab studies suggest that speciation can be rapid
For example, the sunflower Helianthus anomalus originated from the hybridization of two other sunflower species and quickly diverged into a new species
116

117. A hybrid sunflower species
Figure 22.15
Figure A hybrid sunflower species and its dry sand dune habitat
A hybrid sunflower species
117

118. chromosomes are shown)
Figure 22.16
Experiment
H. annuus
gamete
H. petiolarus
gamete
F1 experimental hybrid
(4 of the 2n  34
chromosomes are shown)
Results
H. anomalus
Chromosome 1
Figure Inquiry: How does hybridization lead to speciation in sunflowers?
Experimental hybrid
H. anomalus
Chromosome 2
Experimental hybrid
H. annuus-specific marker
H. petiolarus-specific marker
118

119. The interval between speciation events can range from 4,000 years (some cichlids) to 40 million years (some beetles), with an average of 6.5 million years
119

120. Studying the Genetics of Speciation
A fundamental question of evolutionary biology persists: How many genes change when a new species forms?
Depending on the species in question, speciation might require the change of only a single allele or many alleles
For example, in Japanese Euhadra snails, the direction of shell spiral affects mating and is controlled by a single gene
120

121. In monkey flowers (Mimulus), two loci affect flower color, which influences pollinator preference
Pollination that is dominated by either hummingbirds or bees can lead to reproductive isolation of the flowers
In other species, speciation can be influenced by larger numbers of genes and gene interactions
121

122. (c) Mimulus cardinalis M. cardinalis with M. lewisii allele (d)
Figure 22.17
(a) Mimulus lewisii
M. lewisii with
M. cardinalis allele
(b)
Figure A locus that influences pollinator choice
(c) Mimulus cardinalis
M. cardinalis with
M. lewisii allele
(d)
122

123. (a) Mimulus lewisii Figure 22.17a
Figure 22.17a A locus that influences pollinator choice (part 1: M. lewisii)
(a) Mimulus lewisii
123

124. M. lewisii with M. cardinalis allele (b) Figure 22.17b
Figure 22.17b A locus that influences pollinator choice (part 2: M. cardinalis allele)
M. lewisii with
M. cardinalis allele
(b)
124

125. (c) Mimulus cardinalis
Figure 22.17c
Figure 22.17c A locus that influences pollinator choice (part 3: M. cardinalis)
(c) Mimulus cardinalis
125

126. (d) M. cardinalis with M. lewisii allele Figure 22.17d
Figure 22.17d A locus that influences pollinator choice (part 4: M. lewisii allele)
(d)
M. cardinalis with
M. lewisii allele
126

127. From Speciation to Macroevolution
Macroevolution is the cumulative effect of many speciation and extinction events
127

128. Figure 22.UN02
Figure 22.UN02 Skills exercise: identifying independent and dependent variables, making a scatter plot, and interpreting data
128

129. Allopatric speciation
Figure 22.UN03
Original population
Figure 22.UN03 Summary of key concepts: speciation
Allopatric speciation
Sympatric speciation
129

130. Ancestral species: AA BB DD Triticum monococcum (2n  14) Wild
Figure 22.UN04
Ancestral species: AA BB DD
Triticum
monococcum
(2n  14)
Wild
Triticum
(2n  14)
Wild
T. tauschii
(2n  14)
Product:
Figure 22.UN04 Test your understanding, question 7 (polyploidy)
AA BB DD
T. aestivum
(bread wheat)
(2n  42)
130