1. Total implantation of the implex TICA hearing amplifier implant for high-frequency sensorineural hearing loss 
Hans Peter Zenner, MD, Hans Leysieffer, PhD 
Otolaryngologic Clinics of North America 
Volume 34, Issue 2, Pages (April 2001)
DOI: /S (05)
Copyright © 2001 W. B. Saunders Company Terms and Conditions

2. Fig. 1
TICA (Implex, Munich, Germany) components. Piezoelectric actuator (A) with rod for coupling to the incus body and clip (B) for coupling to the long incus process. C and D, Membrane sensor with retention collar. Actuator and sensor possess plugs to be inserted into the (E and F) main module with digitally programmable 3-channel audio-processor. Note pressure connector assembly (PCA) opened for sensor and actuator plugs. G, PCA closed.
Otolaryngologic Clinics of North America  , DOI: ( /S (05) )
Copyright © 2001 W. B. Saunders Company Terms and Conditions

3. Fig. 2
Actuator displacement (XS) versus frequency in a no load condition (insert) using laser doppler vibrometry.
Otolaryngologic Clinics of North America  , DOI: ( /S (05) )
Copyright © 2001 W. B. Saunders Company Terms and Conditions

4. Fig. 3
Estimated equivalent sound pressure level. Equivalent sound pressure level (SPL) was estimated for the actuator at maximum driving voltage (1.0 VRMS).
Otolaryngologic Clinics of North America  , DOI: ( /S (05) )
Copyright © 2001 W. B. Saunders Company Terms and Conditions

5. Fig. 4
Actuator displacement under load. Displacement (Xs) versus frequency in a simulated middle ear coupling condition. The insert shows the invitro coupling condition using an artificial ossicle made of stiff Silastic.
Otolaryngologic Clinics of North America  , DOI: ( /S (05) )
Copyright © 2001 W. B. Saunders Company Terms and Conditions

6. Fig. 5
Actuator displacement in the presence of load and friction. Displacement (Xs) versus frequency in the same coupling condition as shown in Figure 3. In this case the influence of possible tissue growth around the coupling area to the ossicles was simulated by using a little drop of silicone grease (insert).
Otolaryngologic Clinics of North America  , DOI: ( /S (05) )
Copyright © 2001 W. B. Saunders Company Terms and Conditions

7. Fig. 6
Nonlinear distorsion of the actuator. Experiments were performed using contactless laser doppler vibrometry in the in vitro simulation corresponding to Figure 3. The transducer was driven with a sinusoidal voltage at 1000 Hz and 1.0 VRMS.
Otolaryngologic Clinics of North America  , DOI: ( /S (05) )
Copyright © 2001 W. B. Saunders Company Terms and Conditions

8. Fig. 7
Temporal resolution of the actuator. A, Actuator driven with an electrical unipolar pulse of 100 μs of 1.4 Vpeak. Impulse response was measured using laser doppler vibrometry. B, Transducer response in a mechanical no load condition (compare with Figure 2). C, Impulse response corresponding to the mechanical load simulation of Figure 3. D, Impulse response corresponding to the load condition as in Figure 4.
Otolaryngologic Clinics of North America  , DOI: ( /S (05) )
Copyright © 2001 W. B. Saunders Company Terms and Conditions

9. Fig. 8
Frequency response of the sensor with the membrane covered by skin. Experiments were performed in an acoustic free-field condition.
Otolaryngologic Clinics of North America  , DOI: ( /S (05) )
Copyright © 2001 W. B. Saunders Company Terms and Conditions

10. Fig. 9
Directional characteristic of the sensor. Sensor was positioned in an artificial ear canal of a KEMAR head (right). Directional characteristic of the KEMAR® head using a standard 2 ccm coupler (left). Frequencies: line = 1 kHz; dashed line = 2 kHz; dotted line = 4 kHz. Measurements were done in an unechoic chamber in free-field conditions.
Otolaryngologic Clinics of North America  , DOI: ( /S (05) )
Copyright © 2001 W. B. Saunders Company Terms and Conditions

11. Fig. 10
Stapes displacement. Qualitative frequency response of the stapes displacement (Xs) in a fresh temporal bone with transducer coupling to the incus body. The displacement measurement was done using a contactless laser doppler vibrometer centered on the stapes footplate through an intracochlear access from the cranial side.
Otolaryngologic Clinics of North America  , DOI: ( /S (05) )
Copyright © 2001 W. B. Saunders Company Terms and Conditions

12. Fig. 11
Sensor implanted in a fresh temporal bone. This situation was used for determination of acoustic free-field frequency response in Figure 12.
Otolaryngologic Clinics of North America  , DOI: ( /S (05) )
Copyright © 2001 W. B. Saunders Company Terms and Conditions

13. Fig. 12
Acoustic free-field frequency response of the sensor. Sensor was implanted in a fresh temporal bone (see Fig. 11). Lmik = 0 dB corresponds to a sensor sensitivity of 3 m V/Pa.
Otolaryngologic Clinics of North America  , DOI: ( /S (05) )
Copyright © 2001 W. B. Saunders Company Terms and Conditions

14. Fig. 13
Human studies. A, Phase I study. B, Acute study during tympanoplasty.
Otolaryngologic Clinics of North America  , DOI: ( /S (05) )
Copyright © 2001 W. B. Saunders Company Terms and Conditions

15. Fig. 14
Clinical TICA implant according to Leysieffer-Zenner. A, Coupling to long incus process. B, Coupling to incus body and optional reversible malleus neck dissection (reversible malleus neck dissection (RMND), Fig. 16). C, Implant with actuator (right), sensor (top) and main module (includes battery and microprocessor). D, Radiograph of TICA implanted in a patient.
Otolaryngologic Clinics of North America  , DOI: ( /S (05) )
Copyright © 2001 W. B. Saunders Company Terms and Conditions

16. Fig. 15
Surgical procedure. A, Coupling to the long incus process. B, Insertion of membrane sensor. C, Coupling to incus body. D, Final view of implant coupled to incus body.
Otolaryngologic Clinics of North America  , DOI: ( /S (05) )
Copyright © 2001 W. B. Saunders Company Terms and Conditions

17. Fig. 16
Reversible malleus neck dissection (RMND). May be performed using a CO2 laser (Sharplan, Tel Aviv, Israel). RMND may be restored using a drop of liquid cement (From Zenner et al, 2000; with permission).
Otolaryngologic Clinics of North America  , DOI: ( /S (05) )
Copyright © 2001 W. B. Saunders Company Terms and Conditions

18. Fig. 17
Postoperative care. A, Microscopy of external auditory canal. B, Telemetrical fitting of the implant using a PC-based adjustment software. C, Wireless, battery-driven remote control for the patient.
Otolaryngologic Clinics of North America  , DOI: ( /S (05) )
Copyright © 2001 W. B. Saunders Company Terms and Conditions

19. Fig. 18
Results of prospective clinical study (n = 20). A, Functional gain (difference of postoperative unaided and aided binaural free-field thresholds) with TICA programmed for a most comfortable setting (n = 19 patients). Thin line = median values and interquartile ranges; Thick line = maximum functional gain. B, Six months' postoperative speech discrimination results using a monosyllabic test (Freiburg test), n = 19 patients, median values and interquartile ranges. C, Spatial hearing: left column shows correct answers, right 3 columns show errors. D, Quality of life evaluation (Gothenburg profile) for the preoperative unaided, preoperative aided (conventional hearing aids) and postoperative aided (TICA) condition.
Otolaryngologic Clinics of North America  , DOI: ( /S (05) )
Copyright © 2001 W. B. Saunders Company Terms and Conditions

20. Fig. 18
Results of prospective clinical study (n = 20). A, Functional gain (difference of postoperative unaided and aided binaural free-field thresholds) with TICA programmed for a most comfortable setting (n = 19 patients). Thin line = median values and interquartile ranges; Thick line = maximum functional gain. B, Six months' postoperative speech discrimination results using a monosyllabic test (Freiburg test), n = 19 patients, median values and interquartile ranges. C, Spatial hearing: left column shows correct answers, right 3 columns show errors. D, Quality of life evaluation (Gothenburg profile) for the preoperative unaided, preoperative aided (conventional hearing aids) and postoperative aided (TICA) condition.
Otolaryngologic Clinics of North America  , DOI: ( /S (05) )
Copyright © 2001 W. B. Saunders Company Terms and Conditions

21. Fig. 19
Results of patients selected according to the criteria in Figure 20. A, Functional gain (difference of postoperative unaided and aided binaural free-field thresholds) with TICA programmed for a most comfortable setting. Thick line = median values and interquartile ranges; thin line = maximum functional gain. B, Threshold transfer into long-term speech spectrum. C, Word recognition. D, Gothenburg profile before and after surgery.
Otolaryngologic Clinics of North America  , DOI: ( /S (05) )
Copyright © 2001 W. B. Saunders Company Terms and Conditions

22. Fig. 19
Results of patients selected according to the criteria in Figure 20. A, Functional gain (difference of postoperative unaided and aided binaural free-field thresholds) with TICA programmed for a most comfortable setting. Thick line = median values and interquartile ranges; thin line = maximum functional gain. B, Threshold transfer into long-term speech spectrum. C, Word recognition. D, Gothenburg profile before and after surgery.
Otolaryngologic Clinics of North America  , DOI: ( /S (05) )
Copyright © 2001 W. B. Saunders Company Terms and Conditions

23. Fig. 20
Indications for TICA LZ Moderate to severe high frequency SNHL up to 90 dB at ≥3 kHz. Maximum low frequency hearing loss should be no more than 30 dB at 0.5 kHz. In addition, the slope of hearing loss between 0.5 and 2 kHz should be 30 dB and more. Missing benefits from conventional hearing aids include medical problems, psycho-social problems, audiologic problems, professional problems. Mastoid with normal pneumatization.
Otolaryngologic Clinics of North America  , DOI: ( /S (05) )
Copyright © 2001 W. B. Saunders Company Terms and Conditions