Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byDevyn Ledington Modified over 10 years ago
1
1
2
Feasibility of Retrofitting Centralized HVAC Systems for Room-Level Zoning Tamim Sookoor Brian Holben Kamin Whitehouse June 7, 2012 International Green Computing Conference (IGCC 12)
3
U.S. energy usage* 1 *U.S. Department of Energy, 2006
4
U.S. residential energy use* Homes are ~30% vacant * National Academy of Science, 2006 2
5
U.S. residential energy use 2 Homes are ~30% vacant Smart Thermostat: 28% savings --Sensys 2010
6
U.S. residential energy use 2 Homes are ~50% used when occupied Our goal: Occupancy-driven zoning
7
U.S. residential energy use Homes are ~50% used when occupied Our goal: Occupancy-driven Zoning 2
8
Overview Zoning Overview Preliminary Studies Results 3
9
Overview Zoning Overview Preliminary Studies Results 3
10
Snap-in zoning retrofit 4
11
5
12
Low cost DIY: no configuration Focus on forced air Other systems are similar 6
13
7
14
7
15
7
16
7
17
7
18
7
19
7
20
7
21
7
22
7
23
8 Central HVAC One sensor One air conditioner Snap-in Zoning Zoned HVAC K sensors K air conditioners K+1 Control Signals One air conditioner K sensors Q1: Does room usage vary? Q2: Can a house be partially conditioned? Q3: Does partial conditioning save energy? Q4: Does leakage reduce efficiency?
24
Overview Zoning Overview Preliminary Studies Results 9
25
Does room usage vary? Smart home data set over 28 days* 10 Bedroom Kitchen Toilet 12AM3AM6AM9AM12PM3PM6PM9PM12AM * Kasteren et al.
26
Can a house be partially conditioned? Empirical Study 11 Living Room Kitchen Dining Room Office Bedroo m
27
Can a house be partially conditioned? Office 12
28
Does partial conditioning save energy? System turns off faster 13 EnergyPlus Simulation
29
Does leakage reduce efficiency? 14 43210 Number of external walls 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 Energy (kWh) Insulation Effect
30
Overview Zoning Overview Preliminary Studies Results 15
31
Experimental approach Deployed zoning in a 7-room house 7 sets of dampers 21 thermostats Controlled based on temperature 20 days of data Compared to whole-house conditioning 16
32
Static Dual-Zone 17
33
Evaluation method SunMonTueWedThuFriSat … Dual-Zone Whole house 18
34
Energy savings 21% savings Statistically significant at alpha = 0.15 19
35
Zone airflow 20
36
Zone airflow 20
37
Zone airflow 20
38
Zone airflow 20
39
Total airflow 21
40
Conclusions Snap-in Zoning Cheap, easy, & energy saving Many challenges have to be overcome Equipment safety, occupancy prediction Results indicate potential for energy savings 22
41
Credits & Questions Tamim Sookoor, Brian Holben, Kamin Whitehouse
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.