1. REDD+ INDONESIA through REDDCompass Platform
FRANKY ZAMZANI
GHG Inventory on Forestry Sectors
DG CC of MOEFRI
Bogota, 13 March 2018

2. REDDcompass guides users through core Themes, Concepts and Actions involved in the development of National Forest Monitoring Systems (NFMS) for Measurement, Reporting and Verification (MRV). The Big Pyramid consist of 4 themes: Institutional Arrangement, Policy + Design Decisions, Measurement and Estimation, and Reporting and Verification. Each themes consist of several aspects that build the pyramid.
These aspects are what we discussed so that we can fill in how the current situation, the challenges, solutions, and agencies are involved

3. INSTITUTIONAL ARRANGEMENT
CURRENT CONDITION
Indonesia already has governing instrument and policy.
Institutions have already established >> DG CC (2015)
Indonesia has established National MRV Scheme and on the final process in detailing MRV Scheme for REDD+
Indonesia has already established MRV Team and GHGI Team  Coordination mechanism and approval process among stakeholders not yet established
Indonesia also has NFMS (WebGIS), SIGN-SMART, SIS REDD+ and National Registry System (SRN)
This chapter describes institutional arrangements and operational processes which support effective
REDD+ implementation. And I try to summarize from all aspects included in Institutional Arrangement Pyramid.
CHALLENGES
Lack of coordination among the stakeholders and different priorities among the stakeholders
Lack of Skilled Human Resources on MRV process
Lack of coordination among stakeholders
Need more financial support for MRV Team
Remote sensing: difficult to have a continuous, clear and complete of data
Ground observation: large forest cover area, difficult access to reach remote forest area.

4. INSTITUTIONAL ARRANGEMENT
SOLUTIONS
Improving the coordination by intense communication
Mainstreaming of CC on other institutions programs
Capacity building, Technical Expert and additional skilled Human Resources
Improving coordination among stakeholders as a member MRV Team
Providing mechanism for approval process
Enhancement and mobilization of support for operational of the MRV Team
Improvement of communication among involved stakeholders
Using higher resolution satellite imagery.
Capacity building, training of trainers on emissions/removals measurement.
AGENCIES
DG CC, Dit. GHG Inventory and MRV, HRD Agencies, Ministry of Finance, FOERDIA, DG Forest Planning and Environmental Management, Indonesia National Institute of Aeronautics and Space (LAPAN), Geospatial Information Agency (BIG), Universities, and Research Institutions

5. POLICY AND DESIGN DECISIONS
CURRENT CONDITION
working definition of a forest, is defined as “a land area of more than 6.25 ha with trees higher than 5 meters at maturity and a canopy cover of more than 30 percent.
REDD Activities only calculate from deforestation and forest degradation
Carbon pools: AGB and soil carbon (peat decomp. and fire)
Forests are classified into 6 classes as natural forests (from 23 classes of land cover classification)
Tier 2; Approach Tier 3
Reference period: Baseline from 1990 to Spatial: national level
Policy and Design Decisions describes related policy, institutional and methodological
frameworks and provides advice on how to combine them. It considers use of existing information,
methodological choice and associated implications for reference levels, the role of subnational
approaches and cost effectiveness
CHALLENGES
Reduce the uncertainty of the emission estimates associated with deforestation, forest degradation. Still problematic to monitor different degrees of forest degradation
Improve and classify forest emission factors for each forest strata
Improve peatland emission factor
Inclusion of other REDD+ Activities
How to capture and integrate specific circumstances of subnational levels into national level

6. POLICY AND DESIGN DECISIONS
SOLUTIONS
Utilization of the advance technology in RS
One-Map Policy for high-resolution satellite image provision
Establishment of new plots for mangrove
Estimating emission factors for each forest stratum by collaborating with FOERDIA to improve available field data
Monitoring annual peatland emission considering peatland characteristics such as vegetation types, peat depths, water table levels and soil organic carbon contents
Improved MRV approaches and techniques
One map policy and Intensive coordination.
AGENCIES
DG Forest Planning and Environmental Management (lead agency), DGCC, Indonesia National Institute of Aeronautics and Space (LAPAN), Geospatial Information Agency (BIG), Research Agencies, HRD Agency for Capacity Building, DG Sustainable Production Forest Management (PHPL), DG Natural Resources Conservation and Ecosystems, Private Companies

7. MEASUREMENT AND ESTIMATION
CURRENT CONDITION
Visual interpretation analysis
High uncertainty of Activity Data and EF
Derived from NFI permanent sampling plots data covering all forest classes
Mangrove forests using average emission factor for all forest strata
Still using Tier 2 and Tier 1
Database storage still separate.
CHALLENGES
Reduced uncertainty of activity data and emission factors
Improved RS Analysis to Semi Automatic (Hybrid) Method
Redefining NFI
Improved Peatland Emission Factors
Improvement from Tier 2 to Tier 3
System database development using Web-based, Cloud computing

8. MEASUREMENT AND ESTIMATION
SOLUTIONS
Visual interpretation  semi automatic (hybrid)
From no stratification on forest class  stratification using trees density (H,M,L). This to improve certainty in measuring carbon stock and emissions
Systematic plot design were used to estimate the potential volume of trees. However, some forest types and detail parameter not yet cover.
Improvement new NFI with additional parameter to fulfil carbon inventory, such as soil type and depth, liter, etc.
Tier 2  Tier 3 To improve accuracy of land cover map and its changes, and integrated with emission factor
Improvement in measuring EF
Data located in each institution/not connected, limited storage
AGENCIES
DG Forest Planning and Environmental Management (lead agency), DGCC, Indonesia National Institute of Aeronautics and Space (LAPAN), Geospatial Information Agency (BIG), FORDIA, Research Agencies, HRD Agency for Capacity Building, DG Pollution Control and Environmental Damage(PPKL), Private Companies

9. REPORTING AND VERIFICATION
CURRENT CONDITION
Reports emission from LULUCF & forestry has been established.
Reporting has used consistently approach based remote sensing, align with IPPC guideline (Tier 2).
Reporting of data inventory focuses on AGB.
Guidelines of data inventory compilation needs to be improved
FREL only calculates deforestation and forest degradation
The communication processes and understanding on mitigation action plan is not optimal.
CHALLENGES
Institutional arrangement of inventory compilation is less optimal
Issues related to agreed time-frame of data collection and variability methodology of measure peat fire emission
Unreliable data of fuel wood consumption
AGB related reporting over litter, DW, SOC, Harvested Wood Product does not exist
Diversity and complexity of land cover typology

10. REPORTING AND VERIFICATION
SOLUTIONS
Regulation that requires related fields/sectors to be timely in data collection and reporting
Established of Integrated data base management
Improving on fuel wood data
A robust support from AFOLU emission related research institute to generate proven method in terms of Litters, DW, HPF
User-friendly application, fast, and implementable for AFOLU sectors related emission
AGENCIES
DGCC, FORDIA, Law Bureau of MoEF, Universities, Ministry of Agriculture (MoA), Sub National Government (Province), Experts and Research Agencies.

11. THANK YOU