Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

ANALYSIS OF LITHIC RESOURCE MANAGEMENT IN PREHISTORY

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "ANALYSIS OF LITHIC RESOURCE MANAGEMENT IN PREHISTORY"— Presentation transcript:

1 ANALYSIS OF LITHIC RESOURCE MANAGEMENT IN PREHISTORY
Laboratori d'Arqueologia Institució Milà i Fontanals - C.S.I.C. Barcelona

2 ANALYSIS OF LITHIC RESOURCE MANAGEMENT IN PREHISTORY
The lithic production process is one of the processes through which the hunter gatherer communities acted on the environment in order to obtain material goods of a mineral nature.

3 ETHNOARCHAEOLOGICAL CONTEXTS AND LITHIC ANALYSIS

4 NORMATIVE ARCHAEOLOGY
Switching from simple form/use analogy to generalized social analogy, OVERRATE lithic samples (specially formalized items) using them as ethnic markers.

5 CRITICAL ETHNOGRAPHY DEMONSTRATES
THAT LITHIC ARTIFACTS DO NOT DEFINE ETHNIC GROUPS PER SE. THAT ONLY THE SOCIAL ORGANIZATION OF RESOURCES EXPLOITATION DISTINGUISHES ONE GROUP FROM OTHERS.

6 WE BELIEVE ARCHAEOLOGICAL METHODOLOGY DO NOT ARRIVE TO THAT ESSENTIAL DEFINITION OF GROUPS. THERE ARE NOT AN ADEQUATE RECORD, NOR SIGNIFICANT VARIABLES AND CATEGORIES DEFINED.

7 ETHNOARCHAEOLOGY SHOW us that lithic implements can offer a lot of relevant social information BUT ONLY if we ask properly and if we extract the adequate categories and significant associations.

8 With Ethnoarchaeology
We can do without the direct ethnografic analogy We can get an adequate STRICTY ARCHAEOLOGICAL methodology to obtain the record representing the significant social organization.

9 Strategies devised and applied in management of mineral resources for the production of stone tools are one of the organizational strategies that rule the biological and social reproduction dynamics of hunter-gatherer communities. Lithic production does not constitute an aim in itself but a previous condition for the procurement of new consumption goods, that will be integer in other working processes (for management of other resources). The specificity in the way people managed mineral resources for production and use of stone tools is conditioned by the organization of general strategies

10 THEREFORE OUR PRACTICE SUGGESTS:
ANALYSIS OF A LITHIC SET MUST BEGIN identifying and characterizing the real tools analysis 1 2 macro and micro use wear the raw material and original source, the production processes identifying and characterizing used area , direction and motion of use, worked material. significant associations =THEMES

11 Starting with themes we distinguish:
consumption goods/desired products derived products generated during production rejected elements (voluntarily discarded remains) residues (unintentionally produced during work)

12 Through the different specific strategies
ALL THAT LED US -TO CHARACTERIZE LITHIC INDUSTRIES: Through the different specific strategies of tool production = of mineral resources managing UNTIL tool consumption = basic subsistence and consumption goods production -QUANTIFY THE RELATIVE SOCIAL EFFORT INVOLVED: of stone tools of other consumption goods= biotic resources managing in production

13 ALL THAT contributes TO DEFINE GLOBAL SOCIAL STRATEGIES =
SOCIAL - ECONOMIC FORMATIONS

14 OBTAINMENT OF CONSUMPTION GOODS OF MINERAL NATURE
RAW MATERIAL PROCUREMENT LITHIC PRODUCTION PROCESS RAW MATERIAL TRANSFORMATION INTO CONSUMPTION GOODS INTEGRATION OF CONSUMPTION GOODS IN OTHER WORKING PROCESSES n 1 2 3 4 5

15 PHASES METHODOLOGY PROCUREMENT OF CONSUMPTION GOODS OF A MINERAL NATURE 1.-Procurement of lithic raw material 2.-Manufacturing lithic instruments -conforming blocs of raw materials -exploitation of the generated morphologies -formatizing supports 3.-Distribution of the generated residues 1.- Petrological identification and characterisation of the raw material to determine the geological and geographic origin. 2.- Descriptions of morpho-technical patterns 3.- Establishment of spatial articulation of the archaeological record INTEGRATION IN WORKING PROCESSES USING THE FINAL FORMS AS WORKING TOOLS. 4.-Consumption of tools 5.- Distribution of residues generated in 4 4.- Use wear Analysis 5.- Study of spatial articulation of archaeological record

16 ELEMENTS REQUIRED PRODUCTS Raw materials Elements that take part in these processes: the required product the object to be transformed the working tool the technique they used the derived products. remains and residues stone tools

17 1.- THE ESTABLISHMENT OF THE GEOLOGICAL AND
GEOGRAPHIC ORIGIN OF VARIOUS RAW MATERIALS REPRESENTED IN THE ARCHAEOLOGICAL CONTEXT IMPLIES: qualitative and quantitative comparison between the results obtained from the analysed samples in the archaeological as well as in the geological contexts that could have constituted their raw materials sources. Analytical techniques used: polarising microscopy of thin sections, x-ray diffraction, x-ray fluorescence ....

18 2.- THE SUCCESSIVE CHANGES PRODUCED
IN THE ORIGINAL MORPHOLOGY OF THE RAW MATERIAL AND THE POSITION OF THE ITEMS IN THIS PROCESS, can be recorded by: The hierarchical reading of the discriminant morphotechnical attributes contained in every material remain. The analytical treatment of the morphotechnical characters, We use: Analytical Typology, proposed by G.Laplace with some additions that led us to compare the morphotechnical description and the use description for all lithic remains (flakes, retouched flakes, etc..).

19 3.- STUDY THE REAL USE OF LITHIC ARTIFACTS
Use-wear analysis/ macro and microwear analysis : We use the classic methodology, proposed by S.A. Semenov: -Systematical use of experimentation and microscopic analysis. -Interpretation of stone tool function through the microscopic examination of wear traces on the surfaces of the tools. -Metallurgical microscope; magnifications from 50x to 500x, (normally used are 100x and 200x) with a photographic system attached) -Cleaning (if no residues) Results: used area direction of use (longitudinal.....) motion of use (cutting...) hardness of worked material (soft, hard, middle..) worked material

20 USE WEAR ANALYSIS

21 WE NEED: EXPERIMENTATION OBJECTIVITY AND QUANTIFICATION
IN EVERY STAGE WE NEED: EXPERIMENTATION OBJECTIVITY AND QUANTIFICATION

22 EXPERIMENTS

23 OBJECTIVITY: OBJECTIVATION OF THE OBSERVED CHARACTERS
ANALYTICAL DESCRIPTION OF Morphotechnical characters Use wear patterns DIGITALISED IMAGE ANALYSIS TO QUANTIFY

24 Structure of a multilevel net with froward outputs

25 ORIGINAL PICTURE QUANTIFIED PICTURE

26 Original image Binary image Preliminary 3D Segmentation

27 Original 3 D

28 Original Theresholded Outlined scars Microscarring areas

29 MICROSCARS Quantification of area and position

30

31 CONCLUSIONS: RELATION BETWEEN:
SHAPE (TECHNIC) - FUNCTION - RAW MATERIAL SPECIFIC STRATEGIES The specificity of the intervention mode for the mineral resources chosen by a society is reflected in the strategies that are applied in their management. The concept of organisational strategies refers to the development of an articulated group of processes,socially established, regulated and determined. We propose that the strategies that were devised and applied in the management of mineral for the production of stone tools belong to the organisational strategies that rule the biological and social reproduction dynamics of the h-g communities.

32 To remaind: Lithic production does not constitute an aim in itself,
but a previous condition for the procurement of new consumption goods.

33 SAMPLE OF THE LITHIC PRODUCTION FROM THE EXCAVATED SETTLEMENTS

34 PALIMPSEST OF ITEMS FROM TUNEL VII

35 HAMERSTONE Lanashuaia

36 Lanashuaia

37 Lanashuaia

38 SCRAPER FOR PIGMENTS Lanashuaia

39 SCRAPER FOR WORKING BONE(Túnel VII)

40 WOOD KNIFE (Túnel VII)

41 RAW MATERIAL PIECE Lanashuaia

42 Lanashuaia

43 SCRAPER Lanashuaia

44 Lanashuaia

45 Lanashuaia

46 Lanashuaia

47 Lanashuaia

48 REFITTING Lanashuaia

49 UNFINISHED FORMS Lanashuaia

50 Lanashuaia

51 DAGGER ARROW POINT (Túnel VII)

52 DAGGER (Túnel VII)

53 ARROW POINTS (Túnel VII)

54 (Túnel VII)

55 KNAPPING ERRORS (Túnel VII) USED ARMS

56 CHIPS PRODUCED BY USE Lanashuaia

57 FISHING WEIGHT (Túnel VII)

58 STATISTICAL DIFFERENCES OF THE USE ON DIFFERENT RAW MATTERS
BETWEEN TWO SETTLEMENT PHASES IN TUNEL VII SITE 0.5 Inf 0.4 Sup 0.3 0.2 0.1 -0.1 -0.2 MEAT HIDE BONE FISH PLANTS Middle/hard

59 THE ANALYSIS OF SPATIAL DISTRIBUTION OF THE LTHIC PRODUCTION PROCESSES
IMPLIES STATING THE RECURRENCES DEFINING THE PATTERNS OF SPATIAL RELATIONSHIPS LASTLY WE NEED TO ANALYSE THE SPATIAL DISTRIBUTION TO UNDERSTAND LITHIC PRODUCTION IN ITS SOCIAL CONTEXT TO


Download ppt "ANALYSIS OF LITHIC RESOURCE MANAGEMENT IN PREHISTORY"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google