Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

New Rules for Redevelopment

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "New Rules for Redevelopment"— Presentation transcript:

1 New Rules for Redevelopment
PSWRC –NAHRO 2018 Conference May 22, 2018 Susan E. Bloch

2 Community Redevelopment Act (1945)
Establishment Community Redevelopment Act (1945) Address blight Affordable housing Community Redevelopment Law (1951) Tax increment authority (1952)

3 Tax Increment Financing
Redevelopment Powers Land assembly Land writedowns Developer selection Financing Tax Increment Financing Public bidding not required TI - property Tax increment above base year within project area. State backfill schools.

4 Growth of Redevelopment
1966 – 27 redevelopment projects 1975 – 156 agencies, 195 project areas, $50 million/year 1984 – 293 agencies, 470 project areas, $378 million/year 2011 – over 400 agencies, project areas, $5 billion/year Prop $/ fiscal year $5.6 billion per SCO

5 Reporting requirements Stricter blight findings
Reforms Fiscal review / negotiated passthrough agreements /statutory passthrough payments Tax increment caps Time limits Reporting requirements Stricter blight findings Time limits on eminent domain Time limits – plan, debt, receipt of TI. Report - HCD, SCO, legislative body.

6 RDA Housing Requirements
Replacement housing 20% set-aside for housing Time limit for expenditure Affordability covenants Limits on admin, public improvement expenditures Inclusionary housing requirement Relocation Replace demolished low/mod. Time limit for land development Excess surplus 55 years

7 Demise of Redevelopment
Perceived abuses Failure to comply with housing requirements Use of TI to fund general gov’t purposes Use of TI for golf courses, etc. Opposition to eminent domain State budget crisis Expenditure, land development,

8 2011 budget proposal AB x 1 26 (dissolve RDA’s) AB x1 27 (pay to play)
Dissolution 2011 budget proposal AB x 1 26 (dissolve RDA’s) AB x1 27 (pay to play) CRA v. Matasantos AB x1 27 unconstitutional All RDAs dissolved effective Governor’s budget proposal AB 27 unconstitutional

9 Enforceable Obligations ROPS Fire sale of assets
AB x1 26 – June 2011 Successor Agencies Oversight Boards Enforceable Obligations ROPS Fire sale of assets

10 Due Diligence Reviews / sweep of housing and nonhousing funds
AB June 2012 Due Diligence Reviews / sweep of housing and nonhousing funds State Controller audit and clawback Fire sale suspended 80 page bill released 6/25/12 signed 6/ Fire sale suspended. FOC. Housing Asset inventory True up payments

11 AB 1484 – Finding of Completion
Use pre-2011 bond proceeds Repay Sponsor loans Long-Range Property Mgmt Plan (LRPMP)

12 Housing Asset Inventory
AB 1484 Housing Asset Inventory Land, loans, covenants, rents, funds payable to Low/Mod Fund Transfer housing assets to Housing Successor Pre-2011 bond proceeds Loans and deferred payments. Dispute over payment for staff costs for retained EO’s

13 Limit on litigation funds
SB 107 September 2015 Limit on admin funds Limit on litigation funds Limit eligible loans (overturned Watsonville) Overturned Glendale (interest rate) Text Sept 10, amended 9/11, presented to Governor 9/17 signed 9/22

14 Attempt to overturn Emeryville (reinstated Sponsor-RDA agreements)
SB 107 Attempt to overturn Emeryville (reinstated Sponsor-RDA agreements) Attempt to overturn Fairfield (funds returned to LMIHAF) Permits limited expenditure of 2011 non-housing bond proceeds

15 Sponsoring jurisdiction or housing authority No Oversight Board review
Housing Successors Sponsoring jurisdiction or housing authority No Oversight Board review CRL requirements (+) Housing bonds – pre- and post-2011 All housing bonds, not just pre-2011.

16 Low and Moderate Income Housing Fund
Housing Successors Low and Moderate Income Housing Fund Monitoring/admin - $200,000 Homeless Prevention/Rapid Rehousing - $250,000 Development New Construction/Rehab Preservation/Acquisition of Covenants

17 Limits on senior housing Excess surplus Reporting
Housing Successors Income targeting At least 30% AMI Max % AMI Limits on senior housing Excess surplus Reporting

18 Susan E. Bloch Burke, Williams & Sorensen, LLP 1901 Harrison Street, Suite 900 Oakland, CA (510)


Download ppt "New Rules for Redevelopment"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google