Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

HS 4160 Critical Scientific Analysis

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "HS 4160 Critical Scientific Analysis"— Presentation transcript:

1 HS 4160 Critical Scientific Analysis
Week 8: Efficacy of Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation Depends on Cytogenetic Risk for Acute Myeloid Leukemia in First Disease Remission HS 4160 Critical Scientific Analysis

2 True. False. From my search outside of this paper, I understand that allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) is a procedure in which a person receives blood-forming stem cells from a genetically similar, but not identical, donor such as sister or brother.

3 True. False. From my search outside of this paper, I understand that autologus hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (auto-HSCT) is a procedure in which a person receives his/her own blood-forming stem cells after high-dose chemotherapy with or without radiotherapy with the intention of eradicating his/her malignant cell population.

4 What is the objective(s) of the study?
To identify the karyotype of AML patients who received allo-HSCT and were in first complete remission. To identify the efficacy of allo-HSCT for patients with AML in second complete remission. To identify the efficacy of allo-HSCT for patients with AML in first complete remission. To identify the karyotype of AML patients who received allo-HSCT and were in second complete remission.

5 Which of the following regarding to AML and allo-HSCT is NOT true?
Efficacy comparison between allo-HSCT and auto-HSCT is usually biased due to many uncontrolled factors. Allo-HSCT is less effective than auto-HSCT. More than 70% young AML patients could achieve complete remission. Karyotyping is the most relevant prognostic marker for AML.

6 All of the following were inclusion criteria EXCEPT:
Original paper in English. Studies dealing only with children. Used overall survival as outcome. Published between 1995 and 2003.

7 Based on the result from table 1, _____ overall survival hazard ratio subgroup comparison were significant. 4 3 2 1

8 Which statistic software was used for this study?
SAS. SPSS. STATA. CMA.

9 Favorable. Intermediate. Poor. Unknown.
inv(16)/t(16;16)/del(16q) was considered as ________ by all three groups according to table 2? Favorable. Intermediate. Poor. Unknown.

10 study ID 2-1. study ID 3-4. study ID 4-4. study ID 5-4.
Which of the following study carried more weight when compared to the rest based on Figure 1? study ID 2-1. study ID 3-4. study ID 4-4. study ID 5-4.

11 This chromosome abnormality is associated with poor outcome according to table 2.
del(5q). t(15;17). inv(16).


Download ppt "HS 4160 Critical Scientific Analysis"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google