Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
1
SEM monitors tests PSI 17..19 February 2006 62 MeV protons
Previously irradiated standard SEM PSI New SEM with grounded plates around ceramics C II F type SEM with no ceramics between HV and SIGNAL F type
2
F type BLM_S
3
F type BLM_S
4
Ceram II (CII)
5
BLM_S Geant4 Simulation Secondary Emission Yield 0. 057 e-/primary @ 1
BLM_S Geant4 Simulation Secondary Emission Yield GeV
6
SEM Foil Geant4 Simulation Secondary Emission Yield 0
SEM Foil Geant4 Simulation Secondary Emission Yield GeV From Calibration: 0.036! 450 GeV
7
HV scan F Type Transverse with 1cm collimator 7e8p+/s/cm2
8
BLM_S Linearity from May 06 in PSB (1 point per bunch)
9
Simultaneous measurement with SEM and ACEM (SEM directly in the beam)
13
Transient effect when changing HV in transverse position – effect on the CERAMICS?
17
19 FEB 2006 F SEM COLLIMATOR position scan
18
19 FEB 2006 F SEM HV scan with Cu collimator
19
Ceram II Beam on Connectors shielding removed
20
F Type Beam on connectors
HV Beam I Beam II F Type Beam on connectors 80pA/cm2 16pA/cm2
21
Attempt to calculate SEY from Bethe Bloch
22
CERAM III with 2 shielding plates Beam on connectors HV SCAN
No clear dependence observed Rem: notice the current density Little better than slide #20
23
CERAM III TRANSVERSE HV SCAN WHY lower for NEGATIVE HV
CERAM III TRANSVERSE HV SCAN WHY lower for NEGATIVE HV?? Centering of beam..? Rather flat down to 10V Transverse -> Aproxim. SEY ! Variations in normalized SEY due to mistakes in PSI beam files
24
F type III TRANSVERSE HV SCAN
25
CERAM III LONGITUDINAL HV SCAN
Strong signal +- 2V ! Voltage not known well below 10V Theory 1.5MeV p+ -> 30%SEY from slide #21…
26
F type III LONGITUDINAL HV SCAN why lower than ceram III?
Strong signal +- 2V ! Theory 1.5MeV p+ -> 30%SEY from slide #21…
27
Ceram III TRANSVERSE POSITION SCAN
GEANT4 simulation to be done including the signal & HV rods – visible on X scan
28
BLMI LONGITUDINAL HV SCAN
Notice the err low negative HV
29
BLMI LONGITUDINAL HV SCAN zoom in time evolutions @ low neg HV
Is this the effect of ions with continuous beam??
30
BLMI LONGITUDINAL Remanent radiation zoom after beam end
Almost linear in LogLog plot => Exponential decay
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.