Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

The New Internet Exploring the Synergy Between the Next Generation Internet and Internet2 Jeffrey R. Ellis, Richard C. Gronback, Adam P. Uccello CSE 245.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "The New Internet Exploring the Synergy Between the Next Generation Internet and Internet2 Jeffrey R. Ellis, Richard C. Gronback, Adam P. Uccello CSE 245."— Presentation transcript:

1 The New Internet Exploring the Synergy Between the Next Generation Internet and Internet2 Jeffrey R. Ellis, Richard C. Gronback, Adam P. Uccello CSE Computer Networks and Communication April 27, 1999

2 Internet2 (I2) and Next Generation Internet (NGI)
Introduction The Gartner Group has predicted that a large minority of the more than 4,500 Internet Service Providers (ISPs) in the United States “will be forced out of business in the next five years.” Two major initiatives in this quest for alleviating the bandwidth-constrained research and academic communities who now share with commercial markets what was once their exclusive network: Internet2 (I2) and Next Generation Internet (NGI) 11/8/2018

3 Internet2 Private Academic Network High-Speed Backbones
Experimental Technologies and Protocols Network Application Development Cooperative Learning 130 Universities 25 Corporate Partners 11/8/2018

4 Internet2 Mission “Facilitate and coordinate the development, deployment, operation and technology transfer of advanced, network-based applications and network services to further U.S. leadership in research and higher education and accelerate the availability of new services and applications on the Internet.” 11/8/2018

5 UCAID’s Internet 2 Goals
Development of a cutting edge network Development of revolutionary networking applications Transfer of networking advances to the commercial Internet 11/8/2018

6 Goal #1: Cutting Edge Network
High Performance Backbone GigaPOPs Experimental Technologies in Data Transfer Reliability Security Hardware Devices Adaptability 11/8/2018

7 Goal #2: Network Applications
Current Model: Client/Server Applets CGI-Scripts Fully Distributed Environment Better Use of Resources 11/8/2018

8 Goal #3: Migration to Internet
Motivation for Corporate Sponsors Public Domain Research Network Topology Adopted by ISPs and Topology Implementers Successes Adopted by Standards Organizations 11/8/2018

9 Internet2 Working Groups
IP version 6 Quality of Service QBone Measurements Network Storage Distributed Storage Infrastructure Applications 11/8/2018

10 Internet2 Working Groups (cont’d)
Multicast Topology Routing Network Management Security 11/8/2018

11 I2 - UConn Participation
“Educational Outcomes of Networked Multimedia” Authentic activities inside classroom setting “Network-Based Monitoring and Fault Diagnosis” Computational complexity overcome by networking “Network-Based Scheduling and Supply Chain Coordination” Integrated planning, scheduling, supply chain tool 11/8/2018

12 I2 - UConn Participation (cntd.)
“Distributed Services Telemedicine” Collaborative image analysis “Virtual One Stop Computational Biology Resource Center” Data location and resource management “Networking Controls for Network Edge Multimedia Appliances Analog and digital signal scheduling 11/8/2018

13 Abilene Network February 1999
C Seattle Pacific Northwest Eugene C NYSERNET NOX P P MREN MERIT CalREN2 North New York C C MAGPI C Chicago Sacramento P Denver Indiana Cleveland C C Great Plains Indianapolis OarNet C P C Front Range Kansas City MAX CalREN2South C Arizona P Los Angeles P C MCNC OneNet Atlanta P SOX C Texas Abilene Router Node Operational January 1999 Planned 1999 Connected GigaPoPs C In Process GigaPoPs P Houston P

14 Next Generation Internet
“The goal of the NGI initiative is to conduct R&D in advanced networking technologies, to demonstrate those technologies in testbeds that are 100 to 1,000 times faster than today’s Internet, and to develop and demonstra[te] on those testbeds revolutionary applications that meet important national needs and that cannot be achieved with today’s Internet.” (LSN98, 1) 11/8/2018

15 NGI - Partners Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA)
National Science Foundation (NSF) National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) National Library of Medicine (NLM) Department of Energy (DoE) (FY99+) 11/8/2018

16 NGI - Budget Funding Fiscal Year (FY) 98 - $100 million
FY 99, 00 - $110 million (projected) 11/8/2018

17 NGI - Goals Goal #1: To advance research, development, and experimentation in the next generation of networking technologies to add functionality and improve performance. 11/8/2018

18 NGI - Goals Goal #2: To develop a Next Generation Internet testbed, emphasizing end-to-end performance, to support networking research and demonstrate new networking technologies. This testbed will connect at least 100 NGI sites – universities, Federal research institutions, and other research partners – at speeds 100 times faster than today’s Internet, and will connect on the order of 10 sites at speeds 1,000 times faster than the current Internet. 11/8/2018

19 NGI - Goals Goal #3: To develop and demonstrate revolutionary applications that meet important national goals and missions and that rely on the advances made in goals 1 and 2. These applications are not possible on today’s Internet. (LSN98, 2) 11/8/2018

20

21 NGI - Application Proposals
Remote Control Telemedicine Sponsored by The National Institutes of Health Vision: Allow control of medical instrument from a distance. 11/8/2018

22 NGI - Application Proposals
Advanced Weather Forecasting Sponsored by NOAA Vision: To add the new advanced Doppler weather radars to the suite of observing systems used to initialize and update numerical weather models. This will provide additional warning of weather related hazards and for crisis management related to these events. 11/8/2018

23 NGI - Application Proposals
Chesapeake Bay Virtual Environment (CBVE) Sponsored by NSF Vision: To enable scientists at dispersed sites to study the Chesapeake Bay and other marine environments using real time control of the simulation and multimodal presentation. 11/8/2018

24 NGI and I2 Synergy Although distinctly different, NGI and I2 share some key features: the vBNS gigaPOPs IPv6 11/8/2018

25 vBNS The very-high-performance Backbone Network Service (vBNS) was launched in April 1995 as the result of a 5 year cooperative agreement between MCI and the NSF. The vBNS provides the following core services: High-speed best-effort Ipv4 datagram delivery service IPv4 multicast service ATM switched virtual circuit logical IP subnet service ATM permanent virtual circuits across the vBNS backbone as needed. Reserved-bandwidth service and a high-speed IPv6 datagram delivery service (under development). 11/8/2018

26 vBNS Like the NSFnet that preceded it, the vBNS is a closed network that connects: NSF-sponsored supercomputer centers (SCC) NSF-specified network access points Originally, only 5 SCCs and 4 network access points were available. The vBNS will ultimately host over 100 institutions, including links to other research networks in the U.S. and abroad. 11/8/2018

27 vBNS - Architectural Layout
Implemented as IP-over-ATM running on over 25,000 km of a Synchronous Optical Network (Sonet) OC Mbps backbone. (Rides on MCI’s Hyperstream network) A collection of ATM switches and IP routers interconnect 12 vBNS POPs, located at MCI terminal facilities, and four POPs located at the following SCCs: The National Center for Atmospheric Research (NCAR) The National Center for Supercomputing Applications (NCSA) The Pittsburgh Supercomputing Center (PSC) The San Diego Supercomputer Center (SDSC). 11/8/2018

28 vBNS Architectural layout of the vBNS (cont’d):
Each POP typically provides access via User-Network Interface (UNI) ports on a Fore ASX-1000 ATM switch. Frame-based connections to a Cisco 7507 router are also available, as are ports which support Packet-over-Sonet To allow supercomputers access via High-Performance Parallel Interface (HIPPI), their POPs also have Ascend GRF 400 routers. Each POP has a Sun Microsystems Ultra-2 workstation with an OC-12 ATM NIC to run nightly tests on each backbone link of the vBNS. Plotted output of these tests on the vBNS web site at 11/8/2018

29 vBNS The high-speed (mostly Mb/s) Ipv4 connectivity between the vBNS and other large Federal Networks provides a valuable broadening of the vBNS community, and is an integral part of the vBNS’ participation in Internet2 and the Next Generation Internet. The vBNS project aims to accelerate the pace of the deployment of advanced services into the commercial Internet in order to advance the capabilities of all Internet users. 11/8/2018

30 vBNS The vBNS is an environment in which new Internet technologies and services can be introduced and evaluated prior to deployment on the large-scale, heavily-loaded commercial backbones. Examples include: Native IP multicasting A reserved bandwidth service The latest version of IP, IPv6. 11/8/2018

31 vBNS Logical Network Map
88 Operational Connections 16 Planned Connections Last Updated 03/16/99 Milwaukee FNAL ANL UIC Chicago Northwestern Madison Notre Dame Dartmouth UNH Minnesota Indiana UMaine Brown Iowa State CA*Net II Boston U MIT Washington Iowa Harvard ESnet MREN/ STARTAP 35 Mbps APAN PNW UMass ESnet 13.8 Mbps SREN SUNY Buffalo NREN 15 Mbps Yale NREN NI Rensselaer TANet DREN Wayne State Abilene Merit Rochester NI Boston NYSERNET Michigan Syracuse NMSU NMSU UC Boulder DREN Oregon State Seattle Michigan State NASA AMES Cornell Columbia Rutgers NYU Abilene UNM NCAR Utah Chicago Cleveland New York City Princeton UC Davis DREN UC Berkeley Ohio State Denver NCSA Sprint NY NAP iDREN UCSF PSC CalREN-2 North UIUC UWV Penn State Drexel Stanford CMU Pitt Perryman, MD UCSC UPenn Missouri San Francisco Washington in St. Louis Johns Hopkins UMBC UMD UCLA MFS DC NAP UCSB CalTech Washington DC USC Cal Poly Pomona Los Angeles ESnet CalREN-2 South Atlanta NREN NIH NI USC ISI Houston Arizona Wake Forest MCI Reston MAX DREN SDSC UCSD Kentucky NCSC Highway 1 UC Irvine Cal State San Bernardino Vanderbilt UNC Texas UC Riverside SDSU Duke ESnet UT Austin Tenn - Knoxville SoX VA Tech NC State ODU Birmingham UVA Georgetown MCI - vBNS POP vBNS Approved Institution Planned vBNS Approved Institution vBNS Partner Institution Network of vBNS Partner Institutions Planned Network of vBNS Partner Institutions Aggregation Point Planned Aggregation Point DS3 OC3 OC12 OC48 MUSC Baylor C. of Medicine George Washington Houston GA State USC Clemson Houston TAMU GA Tech Florida Rice Miami FSU UCF USF NOTE: Lines between institutions and aggregation points or NAPs represent the configured bandwidth of their connection to the vBNS. The bandwidth of the actual circuits may be greater than shown.

32 vBNS Backbone Network Map
Seattle C Boston National Center for Atmospheric Research Ameritech NAP Cleveland C Chicago C New York City C A C C A C C Sprint NAP Pittsburgh Supercomputing Center C Perryman, MD A San Francisco C Denver C C C National Center for Supercomputing Applications C J Washington, DC MFS NAP Los Angeles J C A C San Diego Supercomputer Center Atlanta C Ascend GRF 400 Cisco 7507 Juniper M40 FORE ASX-1000 NAP DS-3 OC-3C OC-12C OC-48 A C Houston C J

33 vBNS Multicast Network Map
Last Updated 03/16/99 Milwaukee FNAL ANL UIC Chicago Northwestern Madison Notre Dame Dartmouth UNH UMaine Minnesota Indiana Brown Iowa State CA*Net II Boston U MIT Washington Iowa Harvard ESnet MREN/ STARTAP 35 Mbps APAN PNW UMass ESnet 13.8 Mbps SUNY Buffalo NREN SREN 15 Mbps Yale NREN NI Rensselaer TANet DREN Wayne State Abilene Merit Rochester NI Boston NYSERNET Michigan Syracuse Oregon State Seattle NMSU NMSU UC Boulder DREN Michigan State NASA AMES Cornell Columbia Rutgers NYU Abilene UNM NCAR Utah Chicago Cleveland New York City Princeton UC Davis DREN UC Berkeley Ohio State Denver NCSA Sprint NY NAP iDREN UCSF PSC CalREN-2 North UIUC UWV Penn State Drexel Stanford CMU Pitt Perryman, MD UCSC UPenn Missouri San Francisco Washington in St. Louis Johns Hopkins UMBC UMD UCLA MFS DC NAP UCSB CalTech Washington DC Los Angeles ESnet USC Cal Poly Pomona CalREN-2 South Atlanta NREN NI USC ISI Houston NIH Arizona Wake Forest MCI Reston MAX DREN SDSC UCSD Kentucky NCSC UC Irvine Cal State San Bernardino UNC Highway 1 Texas Vanderbilt UC Riverside SDSU Duke ESnet UT Austin Tenn - Knoxville SoX VA Tech NC State ODU Birmingham UVA Georgetown MCI - vBNS POP vBNS Approved Institution Planned vBNS Approved Institution vBNS Partner Institution Network of vBNS Partner Institutions Planned Network of vBNS Partner Institutions Aggregation Point Planned Aggregation Point DS3 OC3 OC12 OC48 MUSC Baylor C. of Medicine George Washington Houston GA State USC GA Tech Clemson Houston TAMU Florida Rice Miami FSU UCF USF NOTE: Lines between institutions and aggregation points or NAPs represent the configured bandwidth of their connection to the vBNS. The bandwidth of the actual circuits may be greater than shown.

34 gigaPOPs A gigaPOP is a gigabit-capacity Point of Presence.
To provide the desired interconnectivity, a gigaPOP must: have at least 622 Mbps capacity provide high reliability and availability use the Internet Protocol (IP) as a bearer service also be able to support emerging protocols and applications be capable of serving simultaneously as a workaday environment and as a test bed allow for traffic measurement and data gathering permit migration to differentiated services and application-aware networking 11/8/2018

35 gigaPOPs - Two Types Type I gigapops, which are relatively simple, serve only I2 members, route their traffic through a one or two connections to another gigapops, and therefore have little need for complex internal routing and firewalling. Type II gigapops, which are relatively complex, serve both I2 members and other networks to which I2 members need access, have a rich set of connections to other gigapops, and therefore must provide mechanisms to route traffic correctly and prevent unauthorized or improper use of I2 connectivity. 11/8/2018

36 The NC gigaPOP The NC GigaPOP; a project of the North Carolina Networking Initiative (NCNI). NCNI was formed in May 1996 and is made up of the following: Duke University North Carolina (NC) State the University of North Carolina (UNC) at Chapel Hill MCNC Cisco Systems IBM Nortel Networks Time-Warner Communications 11/8/2018

37 The NC gigaPOP The NC GigaPOP forwarded its first packets on in February 1997, becoming one of the first implementations of a GigaPOP. Four Primary Nodes at NC State, Duke, UNC Chapel Hill and MCNC. These primary nodes will serve as connection points to the vBNS and upcoming Abilene Network, while secondary nodes connect other NCNI partners. 11/8/2018

38 The NC gigaPOP

39 The NC gigaPOP The architecture of the GigaPOP took into consideration two issues: topology fiber-optic infrastructure NC gigaPOP Topology: A ring topology was implemented due to its scalability and its resemblance to what phone and cable companies call a metropolitan network (MAN). Allows for the use of hardware and software equipment that has been optimized for this configuration. 11/8/2018

40 The NC gigaPOP Fiber-Optic Infrastructure: Networking Technologies:
Came down to cost: to lease the required four OC-12 links to form the ring, the monthly cost would be $276,000 a month ($3.3 million per annum). NCNI made a deal with Time Warner Communications to provide a private four-fiber ring infrastructure (two in, two out). Networking Technologies: NCNI decided on the same setup as the vBNS; IP atop ATM over Sonet. Sonet add/drop multiplexers (ADMs) for each of the nodes, providing a total of Gbps (OC-48) in both directions around the ring. 11/8/2018

41 IPv6 An improvement to IPv4 is needed to overcome the scaling problems associated with the Internet’s rapid growth. IPv6 provides a 128-bit address space, which will allow it to address 3.4 x 1038 distinct nodes. “Based on the most pessimistic estimates of efficiency…, the IPv6 address space is predicted to provide over 1500 addresses per square foot of the earth’s surface, which certainly seems like it should serve us well even when toasters on Venus have IP addresses” (Pet96, 254). 11/8/2018

42 IPv6 - Features Expanded Routing and Addressing: along with the increase from 32 to 128-bit addresses, IPv6 will provide more levels of addressing hierarchy and allow for simpler auto-configuration of addresses. An additional “scope” field will add to the scalability of multicast routing. Anycast Addresses: this new type of address will identify sets of nodes where a packet sent to an anycast address is delivered to one of those nodes. This will allow IPv6 source route to allow nodes to control the path which their traffic flows. 11/8/2018

43 IPv6 - Features Header Format Simplification: some of the IPv4 header fields have been dropped or made optional. By header simplification, even though the size of the IPv6 address is four times that of IPv4, its header is only two times longer. Improved Option Support: the IPv6 header options are encoded to allow for more efficient forwarding with less stringent limits on the length of options and greater flexibility for the additions of new options in the future. 11/8/2018

44 IPv6 - Features QoS Capabilities: packets can be labeled as belonging to a particular traffic “flow” for which the sender requests special handling, such as non-default QoS or “real-time” service. Authentication and Privacy Capabilities: IPv6 includes the definition of extensions which provide for authentication, data integrity, and confidentiality. 11/8/2018

45 IPv6 Packet Header

46 Conclusion I2 and NGI: same goal, different directions.
NGI is “top-down” I2 is “bottom-up” Incorporate similar technologies: the vBNS gigaPOPs IPv6 11/8/2018

47 References Jamison, John, et al, "vBNS: Not Your Father's Internet," IEEE Spectrum, July 1998: Von Schweber, Erick, "Projects Promise IS Plenty," PC WEEK, 09 Feb. 1998: Finley, Amy, "Untangling the Next Internet," SunWorld, April 1998: GigaPOP - Lynchpin of Future Networks - Will Add Scalability; Wide Range of Price/Performance Choices," Gartner Group, 19 Aug. 1998: 11/8/2018

48 References "Preliminary Engineering Report," Internet2, 22 Jan. 1997:
Collins, John C., et al, “Data Express: Gigabit Junction with the Next-Generation Internet,” IEEE Spectrum, February 1999: Peterson, Larry L., Davie, Bruce S., Computer Networks: A Systems Approach. San Francisco: Morgan Kaufmann, Hinden, Robert M., “IP Next Generation Overview,” IETF, 14 May 1995: 11/8/2018

49 References (LSN98) Large Scale Networking , Next Generation Internet Implementation Team, NGI Implementation Plan, February (NGI99) The Official NGI Web Site 11/8/2018


Download ppt "The New Internet Exploring the Synergy Between the Next Generation Internet and Internet2 Jeffrey R. Ellis, Richard C. Gronback, Adam P. Uccello CSE 245."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google