1. Political Organization of Space
Territorial Dimensions of politics

2. Concept of Territoriality
Territory: an area of land under the jurisdiction of a ruler or state.
Territoriality: In political geography, a country's or more local community's sense of propertyand attachment toward its territory, as expressed by its determination to keep it inviolable and strongly defended
The Concept of Territoriality Human territoriality is the attempt to control what goes on in a specific geographical area.

3. Human territoriality is the attempt to control what goes on in a specific geographical area. There are various ways to control space that range from pure physical force of an individual to organized sets of laws.
Most geographers believe that human territoriality differs from the territorial behavior observed in other forms of life because human behavior is learned and animal behavior is instinctive.

5. North and South Korea

6. Polar Region

7. Nature and Meaning of Boundaries
The Nature and Meaning of Boundaries Political boundaries exist at a variety of scales, and these boundaries influence how goods and services are distributed, who gets represented and who does not, and how issues are confronted.

8. Think of ways that political boundaries structure human affairs and understandings.
Political boundaries of significance exist both ‘above’ and ‘below’ the state.
Above: boundaries such as the former Iron Curtain, the current boundary between NATO (North Atlantic Treaty Organization) and non-NATO states, or the boundaries that have been drawn through the world's oceans to demarcate zones of control.
Below: municipalities, voting districts, special districts, and areas zoned for particular land uses. Focusing attention on smaller-scale political-territorial units allows students to see how everything from the delivery of services to the reach of certain laws is affected by the particular configuration of political territories.

9. NATO

10. Utah Congressional Districts

11. Influences of boundaries on identity, interaction, and exchange
Illustrate the effects of identity, interaction, and exchange on populations.

12. State Shapes Shapes of states Landlocked states Five basic shapes
Compact = efficient
Elongated = potential isolation
Prorupted = access or disruption
Perforated = South Africa
Fragmented = problematic
Landlocked states

13. State Shapes in Southern Africa

14. Boundaries Types of boundaries Frontiers Physical Cultural
Desert boundaries
Mountain boundaries
Water boundaries
Cultural
Geometric boundaries
Human features (language, religion, ethnicity)
Frontiers

15. Cultural Boundaries

16. Federal and Unitary States
Federal States: strong power to units of local government within the country
Unitary States: places most power in the hands of central government officials
A country’s cultural and physical characteristics influence the evolution of its government system.
Unitary systems work best with countries that are more homogenous and have a strong sense of national unity.
Federal systems work best in multinational states to help empower different nationalities, especially if they live in separate regions.

17. Unitary vs. Federal

18. Example Countries United Kingdom Jordan Turkey Denmark France Cuba
Unitary
Federal
United Kingdom
Jordan
Turkey
Denmark
France
Cuba
North Korea
South Korea
United States of America
India
Brazil
Canada
Australia
Russian Federation
Venezula

19. Spatial relationships between political patterns and patterns of ethnicity, economy, and environment
The division of the world into individual states impedes efforts to confront environment problems such as the depletion of the ozone layer, the loss of biodiversity, and global warming.
We are not living in a world in which most fundamental human realities can be understood or addressed within the territorial state. Yet the state is still fundamentally important as is illustrated by the dozens of interstate territorial conflicts in the contemporary world.
There are dozens of active territorial disputes that have flared up in recent years. If control over territory had lost its political/geopolitical significance in the modern world, such conflicts would not be an important dynamic in international relations.