Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

How editors like their papers Department of Emergency Medicine

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "How editors like their papers Department of Emergency Medicine"— Presentation transcript:

1 How editors like their papers Department of Emergency Medicine
Marcus Müllner Associate editor BMJ Department of Emergency Medicine University of Vienna

2 Some simple points Have the right question
Have a suitable method to answer it Interpret your findings adequately Find the right journal Consult the journal’s guidelines

3 Find the right journal Don’t select it because of its impact factor
Don’t select it because of its “reputation” Select it because of the audience Who will be interested in your paper? Doctors - all or a particular group Researcher Policy makers Public

4 Consult the journal’s guidelines
General points: Journal categories Length Format References Specific points: Conflict of Interest CONSORT QUOROM

5 The ideal paper - a personal view
Short IMRAD Clearly written and presented Complete Try to avoid “silly” errors

6 The ideal Title - a personal view
Informative subject matter study design study population Information clearly presented NO unnecessary detail

7 The ideal Abstract - a personal view
Short Structured Matches content of paper Conclusions only for results presented

8 The ideal Introduction - a personal view
Short Catch the readers attention immediately Tell “the story so far” Are there controversies? Aim of the study

9 The Method section Should be given in such detail to
enable the qualified reader to repeat the experiment

10 The Method section - a personal view
Sufficiently long Subheadings: Population Ethical considerations Definitions Technical description Statistical methods Clear presentation

11 The Result section - a personal view
Clear presentation Short Subheadings, if suitable Careful data presentation redundancy spurious accuracy

12 The structured Discussion - a suggestion
Statement of principal findings Strengths and weaknesses of this study Strengths and weaknesses in relation to other studies Meaning of the study Unanswered questions and future research Doherty M BMJ 1999;318:1225

13 Figures and Tables should:
Add information Save space Self-explanatory Not overloaded with numbers or ink

14 The text in general - the prose style
Clarity Fluency Accuracy Economy Grace

15 Summary There is not one best way but many The choice depends on:
Journal Topic Audience


Download ppt "How editors like their papers Department of Emergency Medicine"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google