Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presented By: Bill Curtis-Davidson

Published byJob Harper Modified over 5 years ago

Similar presentations

Presentation on theme: "Presented By: Bill Curtis-Davidson"— Presentation transcript:

1 Win More Business! Report Product & Service Accessibility using VPAT® 2.1
Presented By: Bill Curtis-Davidson Senior Director, Strategic Consulting Services CSUN 2018 Assistive Technology Conference March 22, 2018 Voluntary Product Accessibility Template® and VPAT® are registered trademarks of Information Technology Industry Council (ITI).

2 Agenda Introduction to VPAT® 2.1 VPAT® 2.1 Structure & Best Practices
Win More Business! Report Product & Service Accessibility using VPAT® 2.1 Introduction to VPAT® 2.1 VPAT® 2.1 Structure & Best Practices Get Started with VPAT® 2.1 Today Q&A and Resources Contacts Introduction to VPAT® 2.1 (ITI) Who is ITI? Why ITI created VPAT® 2.1 Key differences between VPAT® 1.0 and 2.1 VPAT® 2.1 Structure & Tour (Level Access) Getting Ready for VPAT® 2.1 (Level Access) Understanding product coverage Process for conformance statements Q&A and Resources (Both) Contacts (Both) Voluntary Product Accessibility Template® and VPAT® are registered trademarks of Information Technology Industry Council (ITI).

3 Introduction to VPAT® 2.1 Voluntary Product Accessibility Template® and VPAT® are registered trademarks of Information Technology Industry Council (ITI).

4 Who is ITI? Information Technology Industry Council (ITI)
Introduction to VPAT® 2.1 Information Technology Industry Council (ITI) Leading tech voice for 101 years and counting 62 tech businesses from across the globe Long-time advocate for accessible technology Voluntary Product Accessibility Template® and VPAT® are registered trademarks of Information Technology Industry Council (ITI).

5 What is a VPAT®? Voluntary Product Accessibility Template® (VPAT®)
Introduction to VPAT® 2.1 Voluntary Product Accessibility Template® (VPAT®) Developed jointly by ITI and General Services Admin (GSA) VPAT® 1.0 released in 2001 to support documentation of conformance to the original (1998) Section 508 standards Goal: Help enable US Federal Government contracting officials and other buyers to make preliminary assessments of how commercial ICT products/services support accessibility. Document template containing tables for documenting how technical standards and functional performance criteria met Voluntary Product Accessibility Template® and VPAT® are registered trademarks of Information Technology Industry Council (ITI).

6 Why ITI Created VPAT® 2.1 Refreshed Section 508
Introduction to VPAT® 2.1 Refreshed Section 508 Trends favoring harmonized global approach Address perceived shortcomings with VPAT® 1.0 Graphics: PixaBay Voluntary Product Accessibility Template® and VPAT® are registered trademarks of Information Technology Industry Council (ITI).

7 What’s the same as VPAT® 1.0?
Introduction to VPAT® 2.1 Voluntary Freely available Best practices Market research tool Collaboration with U.S. Government

8 What’s different from VPAT® 1.0?
Introduction to VPAT® 2.1 Three standards in one report US Section 508 Refresh  Updated requirements for ICT covered by Section 508 of the Rehabilitation Act and Section 255 of the Communication Act WCAG 2.0 Guidelines Single shared standard for web content accessibility developed through W3C process which meets needs of individuals, organizations, and governments internationally. Standard - EN   Accessibility requirements suitable for public procurement of ICT products and services in Europe

9 What’s different from VPAT® 1.0? (cont’d)
Introduction to VPAT® 2.1 “Accessibility Conformance Report” Section 508, WCAG 2.0, and EN in one template “Voluntary” FAQ page Essential requirements VPAT 2.0 released Oct 2017 VPAT 2.1 released Mar 2018 Takes into account Access Board correction related to Legacy TTY

10 VPAT® 2.1 Structure and Best Practices
Voluntary Product Accessibility Template® and VPAT® are registered trademarks of Information Technology Industry Council (ITI).

11 VPAT® 2.1 Structure and Best Practices
Structure of VPAT® 2.1 VPAT® 2.1 Structure and Best Practices Extensive Instructions Essential requirements, best practices, and FAQs; Remove this section from reports. Accessibility Conformance Report The actual template into which ICT product or service conformance will be documented.

12 Conformance Report Sections
VPAT® 2.1 Structure and Best Practices Report Title: In the heading format of “[Company name] – Accessibility Conformance Report” VPAT® Heading Information: VPAT® heading and acronym with service mark and template version Name of Product: The name of the product being reported, including version of the product Date: Date of report publication (month and year at minimum) Contact Information: Contact information for follow-up questions Notes: Any details or further explanations about the product or the report (may be left blank)

13 Conformance Report Sections (cont’d)
VPAT® 2.1 Structure and Best Practices Standards/Guidelines: Indicate one or more Standards/Guidelines you evaluated against. “Not applicable” should be entered if you did not evaluate against a given Standard/Guideline. Table Information: Table Information description section Terms: Define terms your company is using for ‘Conformance Level’ column for level of support, if not using ITI defaults (be consistent) Report Information: Standards/Guideline conformance information in 3- column tabular format WCAG Tables: Conformance information for WCAG 2.0 conformance at the designated level (A, AA or AAA), also used for conformance with the Section 508 Refresh and EN

14 Conformance Report Section Example
VPAT® 2.1 Structure and Best Practices

15 VPAT® 2.1 Structure and Best Practices
Conformance Ratings VPAT® 2.1 Structure and Best Practices Default responses in Conformance Level column: Supports Supports with Exceptions Does Not Support Not Applicable Not Evaluated (limited to WCAG 2.0 AAA) When documenting conformance to WCAG 2.0: A rating of “Supports” may be used in lieu of “Not Applicable” to document support for success criteria that do not apply to the product In keeping with conventions for documenting conformance with WCAG 2.0 ITI definitions for the ratings under the “Conformance Level” column must be used, or if the vendor deviates from these definitions then the vendor definitions must be documented in the “Terms” section of the VPAT, and this must be referenced in the “Notes” section Supports: Functionality of product has at least one method that meets criteria without known defects or meets with equivalent facilitation. Note: The definition of Supports includes instances where the criteria is supported via the criteria not being applicable to the product, i.e. there is no content which violates the success criteria. Supports with Exceptions: Some functionality of product does not meet criteria. Does Not Support: Majority of functionality of product does not meet the criteria. Not Applicable: Criteria are not relevant to the product. In the WCAG section, use ‘supports’ instead of ‘not applicable’ when reporting web conformance. Not Evaluated: The product has not been evaluated against the criteria. This can only be used in WCAG 2.0 Level AAA.

16 Managing Size of Reports
VPAT® 2.1 Structure and Best Practices Reduce size of reports by removing sections. Individual criteria cannot be removed, only sections at a time. Section removal is acceptable in four situations: Entire standard is not being reported on (remove standard). Entire section is not being reported on because it doesn’t apply to product (remove section). Product is not being evaluated for a level of criteria (e.g. WCAG 2.0 Level AAA) then that table may be deleted. Requesting customer has identified criteria for standard that do not apply. Section removal is acceptable in four situations: When an entire standard is not being reported on, for example EN , there should be no references of it in the report. When an entire section is not being reported on because it doesn’t apply to the product, for example Chapter 4: Hardware. Information should be included in the notes for that section why it’s been removed. If product is not being evaluated for a level of criteria (for example Level AAA) then that table may be deleted. If a requesting customer has identified that criteria for reporting standard does not apply.

17 Get Started with VPAT® 2.1 Today
Voluntary Product Accessibility Template® and VPAT® are registered trademarks of Information Technology Industry Council (ITI).

18 Is Your Company Ready for VPAT® 2.1?
Get Started with VPAT® 2.1 Today Understand Applicability Standardize Process Testing All Requirements Ensure Quality

19 Understand Applicability of Standards
Get Started with VPAT® 2.1 Today Evaluate your product / service functionality Determine which standards apply Hardware, software, support documentation and services Understand Applicability

20 Standardize VPAT® Authoring Process
Get Started with VPAT® 2.1 Today Establish defined internal process and procedures to prepare VPAT®s Implement internal standards to help ensure VPAT®s are complete and accurate Standardize Process

21 Test Against All Applicable Standards
Get Started with VPAT® 2.1 Today Use best practices to test multiple standards Adopt proven and efficient audit methodology Employ automated, manual, A/T validation, plus use case testing by PWDs Testing All Requirements

22 Ensure VPAT® Quality & Accuracy
Get Started with VPAT® 2.1 Today Train resources who prepare your VPAT®s and/or hire knowledgeable consultants Keep your VPAT®s up to date. Implement customer feedback loop for improvements. Track business won/lost based on having effective VPATs® Ensure Quality

23 Q&A and Resources

24 Resources European Union, Standard - EN 301 549
Win More Business! Report Product & Service Accessibility using VPAT® 2.1 European Union, Standard - EN IT Industry Council, Accessibility Policy Level Access, Navigating VPAT® 2.1 Whitepaper Level Access, VPAT® Blog Articles U.S. Access Board, ICT Final Standards and Guidelines (Section 508 Refresh) W3C, Web Content Accessibility Guidelines 2.1

25 Thank You Contact Follow Us
Win More Business! Report Product & Service Accessibility using VPAT® 2.1 Contact Follow Us Bill Curtis-Davidson Sr. Director, Strategic Consulting Services @LevelAccessA11y Level Access Level Access Level Access Blog Slide Deck Available for Download at:

Download ppt "Presented By: Bill Curtis-Davidson"

Similar presentations

PESO Meeting | June 11, 2014 1 TAC 213 Electronic and Information Resources Rule Review Jeff Kline Statewide Accessibility Coordinator Lon Berquist Technology.

PESO Meeting | June 11, TAC 213 Electronic and Information Resources Rule Review Jeff Kline Statewide Accessibility Coordinator Lon Berquist Technology.
Enterprise Content Management Pre-Proposal Conference for RFP No. ISD2006ECM-SS December 6, 2006 California Administrative Office of the Courts Information.

Enterprise Content Management Pre-Proposal Conference for RFP No. ISD2006ECM-SS December 6, 2006 California Administrative Office of the Courts Information.
U.S. General Services Administration General Services Administration Policy, the Procurement Process, the Buy Accessible Wizard, and Purchasing Section.

U.S. General Services Administration General Services Administration Policy, the Procurement Process, the Buy Accessible Wizard, and Purchasing Section.
May not be reproduced without permission 1 Section 508 Procurement Training California State University Accessible Technology Initiative (ATI) - S508PT.

May not be reproduced without permission 1 Section 508 Procurement Training California State University Accessible Technology Initiative (ATI) - S508PT.
Prepared by Long Island Quality Associates, Inc. ISO 9001:2000 Documentation Requirements Based on ISO/TC 176/SC 2 March 2001.

Prepared by Long Island Quality Associates, Inc. ISO 9001:2000 Documentation Requirements Based on ISO/TC 176/SC 2 March 2001.
 Mark & Sons Future Technology Co. (hereafter, MSFT) is a $40 billion public company that provides high-technology products and services.  Currently,

 Mark & Sons Future Technology Co. (hereafter, MSFT) is a $40 billion public company that provides high-technology products and services.  Currently,
Dhananjay Bhole, Coordinator, Accessibility Research Group, Department of Education and Extension, University of Pune.

Dhananjay Bhole, Coordinator, Accessibility Research Group, Department of Education and Extension, University of Pune.
World Class Standards Standards Mandate M 376 – Phase 2 European public procurement of accessible ICT Mandate M 376 - European Accessibility requirements.

World Class Standards Standards Mandate M 376 – Phase 2 European public procurement of accessible ICT Mandate M European Accessibility requirements.
Electronic & Information Technology Purchases Process PAB Monday, December 12 th, 2011.

Electronic & Information Technology Purchases Process PAB Monday, December 12 th, 2011.
Electronic and Information Resources (EIR) Accessibility in Cooperative Contracts Procurement June 2013.

Electronic and Information Resources (EIR) Accessibility in Cooperative Contracts Procurement June 2013.
Introduction to Software Quality Assurance (SQA)

Introduction to Software Quality Assurance (SQA)
SWIS Digital Inspections Project (SWIS DIP) Chris Allen, Information Management Branch California Integrated Waste Management Board November 5, 2008 The.

SWIS Digital Inspections Project (SWIS DIP) Chris Allen, Information Management Branch California Integrated Waste Management Board November 5, 2008 The.
By: Farzad Dadgari Soil and Environmental Specialist SWHISA.

By: Farzad Dadgari Soil and Environmental Specialist SWHISA.
Overview of existing assessment schemes Rolf Bienert, John Lin.

Overview of existing assessment schemes Rolf Bienert, John Lin.
1.  Describe an overall framework for project integration management ◦ RelatIion to the other project management knowledge areas and the project life.

1.  Describe an overall framework for project integration management ◦ RelatIion to the other project management knowledge areas and the project life.
EU actions on Web- Accessibility Funka Accessibility Days 10.04.2013.

EU actions on Web- Accessibility Funka Accessibility Days
U.S. General Services Administration FTS2001 Transition Baseline Inventory Tool Adam Lesser GSA Networx Transition Team (Booz Allen Hamilton) October 25,

U.S. General Services Administration FTS2001 Transition Baseline Inventory Tool Adam Lesser GSA Networx Transition Team (Booz Allen Hamilton) October 25,
VPATs 101 Mary Utt 30 April 2009 “Accessibility provides the opportunity to disrupt your competitors, capture new markets and achieve remarkable ROI.”

VPATs 101 Mary Utt 30 April 2009 “Accessibility provides the opportunity to disrupt your competitors, capture new markets and achieve remarkable ROI.”
Evaluate Phase Pertemuan 23-24 Matakuliah: A0774/Information Technology Capital Budgeting Tahun: 2009.

Evaluate Phase Pertemuan Matakuliah: A0774/Information Technology Capital Budgeting Tahun: 2009.
Training Module: APD Template County APD Process Training November 16, 2007 California Health and Human Services Agency - Office of Systems Integration.

Training Module: APD Template County APD Process Training November 16, 2007 California Health and Human Services Agency - Office of Systems Integration.

Similar presentations

Ads by Google