Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Airpower in the Post Cold War

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Airpower in the Post Cold War"— Presentation transcript:

1 Airpower in the Post Cold War

2 Overview I Gulf War Background The Enemy The Plan of Attack
Objectives Concept of Operations Five Strategic Rings Targets Phases of the Campaign Operations PROVIDE COMFORT/NORTHERN WATCH The Conflict and Lessons Learned

3 Overview II Operation SOUTHERN WATCH History of the Balkans
The Conflict and Lessons Learned History of the Balkans Background Ethnic Groups Operation DENY FLIGHT

4 Overview III Operation ALLIED FORCE Evolution of Airpower Background
NATO Actions Operation ALLIED FORCE Begins Lessons learned by US Military Political Lessons Learned Impact of Lessons Learned on Future DOD Budget Evolution of Airpower

5 Gulf War Background Conflict began 2 August 1990
Iraq and Kuwait could not settle grievances over oil Saddam Hussein sent armies to invade Kuwait

6 US Objectives Immediate, complete, and unconditional withdrawal of all Iraqi forces from Kuwait Restoration of Kuwait’s legitimate government Security and stability of Saudi Arabia and the Persian Gulf Protection of American citizens abroad

7 Operation DESERT SHIELD
CENTCOM CINC—Army Gen H. Norman Schwarzkopf CENTAF Lt Gen Charles A. Horner Became JFACC during the war In first 5 days: Five fighter squadrons, contingent of AWACS, and part of 82d Airborne Division Equaled Iraqi force in first 35 days Air Reserves/Air National Guard called to active duty

8 DESERT STORM Begins 16 Jan—An 11th-hour appeal for Iraqi withdrawal from Kuwait drew silence 17 Jan—Operation DESERT STORM began as allied forces answered Iraq’s silence Within 10 days, air sorties reached the 10,000 mark

9 Iraqi Threat 4th largest armed force in world
Well over 1 million troops 750 combat and 200 support aircraft Nuclear, biological, and chemical capabilities SCUD Missiles

10 Air Defense Threat Iraq’s air defense system thought to be the best outside of the Soviet Union United States was probably the only nation in the world with the airpower to “disintegrate” an integrated system of this type

11 Article: Horner’s Anxious Moments
What vulnerabilities did Lt. Gen Horner have to contend with in the build-up of Desert Storm? How did commanding a young, non-combat experienced, Air Force weigh on Lt Gen Horner’s conscience? When it comes to education and training what is your role as a young officer?

12 Leadership Focus

13 Objectives Isolate and incapacitate Iraqi command structure
Win air superiority Destroy nuclear, biological, and chemical capabilities Eliminate Iraqi offensive military capability Eject Iraqi Army from Kuwait

14 Concept Of Operations Powerful and focused air attacks on strategic centers of gravity over a short period of time Target Hussein Regime, not Iraqi people Minimize civilian casualties and collateral damage Minimize Coalition losses Pit US and Coalition strengths against Iraqi weaknesses

15 Instant Thunder Developed by Colonel John Warden and his Checkmate staff in Washington Named in direct response to Vietnam’s unsuccessful Rolling Thunder campaign Based on a unique five-ring model of the modern nation-state

16 The Five Strategic Rings

17 Target Systems

18 Article: The Presentation of a Lifetime
Even though Col Warden was considered an expert in his field why did he encounter resistance from leadership? How can your subject matter expertise actually work against you? Why is it important to consider the inputs of key people? What is the value of knowing the experience levels of your team members? At different levels in the chain? Why do you think Lt Col Deptula was successful? Do you think that Col Warden’s knowledge about the employment of military capabilities hindered him? Why or why not?

19 Leadership Focus

20 Campaign Overview Four Part Campaign: Phase I: Strategic Air Campaign
Phase II: Suppression of enemy Air Defenses over Kuwait vicinity Phase III: Air Attacks on ground forces in Kuwait and vicinity Phase IV: Ground Operations as directed

21 And in the end… On 27 Feb 1991, the Iraqi military was scattered and defeated Iraq lost 90 aircraft to coalition forces 122 Iraqi aircraft fled to Iran Stealth provided the needed edge The Persian Gulf War officially ended on 11 Apr 1991

22 Leadership Focus

23 FOCUS ON LEADERSHIP GEN MERRILL A. McPEAK
Why do you think it was important that Gen McPeak not become paralyzed by the legacy and tradition What is you role as young officer in supporting institutional change?ns of yesterday’s Air Force?

24 The Crisis in Iraq—ONW UN Security Council established a no-fly zone over northern Iraq to protect the Kurdish people from attacks by Saddam Hussein Operation Provide Comfort began on 5 Apr 1991 as a humanitarian relief effort to deliver food, clothing, and supplies to Iraq’s Kurdish refugees C-130s began airdropping supplies on 7 Apr 1991 Lasted approximately 8 years and was then replaced by Operation NORTHERN WATCH

25 The Crisis in Iraq: Lessons Learned—ONW
The need to avoid fratricide The limitations of airdrops Host-country tensions The need for alternate bases Lack of an exit strategy

26 The Crisis in Iraq—OSW OSW was a Combined Task Force enforcing the “no-fly zone” below the 32nd parallel (extended to 33rd in 1996) in southern Iraq Not an aggression against Iraq—executed as a self-defense measure Coalition partners included the US, UK, France, Saudi Arabia, and Kuwait Fire from more than 850 Iraqi SAMs and AAAs directed at coalition aircraft Iraq violated the no-fly zone more than times More than 150,000 USAF sorties by 1998

27 “What we’ve effectively done since 1992 is conduct an air occupation of a country…”
General Ronald R. Fogleman Jul 1995

28 The Crisis in Iraq: Lessons Learned—OSW
Became a test for USAF AEF concept in Oct 1995 Quality-of-life changes needed due to high Ops-Tempo Reorganized Security Forces

29 Leadership Focus

30 FOCUS ON LEADERSHIP POLICING POSTWAR IRAQ
The US was tasked with constantly deploying troops to support Operation Provide Comfort, Operation Northern Watch, and Operation Southern Watch. What type of stress did constant engagement put on the force? Why do you think it was important to institute the AEF concept? In the early stages of AEF, commanders used to fight to keep troops on home station rather than forward deployed. What was the impact of such action? As new flight commander what are your responsibilities in supporting the AEF schedule?

31 Background to the Crisis in Bosnia
The anti-Nazi Josep Broz Tito came out of World War II with a difficult task—keeping Yugoslavia together as a nation. He used Communism and the slogan “Brotherhood and Unity” to refocus ethnic differences on a common ideology. Forty percent of the population of postwar Yugoslavia was Serbian. To dilute the influence of the Serbs, Tito created six republics: Slovenia, Croatia, Bosnia-Herzegovina, Serbia, Macedonia, and Montenegro. He recognized the Muslims in Bosnia as an ethnic group and further created the autonomous regions of Vojvodina and Kosovo within the Republic of Serbia, incorporated in a constitutional change in These republics and provinces shared equal power under a rotating presidency within the government; however, ultimate power rested with Tito and the Communist Party.

32 Background to the Crisis in Bosnia
The 1974 constitution minimized centralized control and, with the introduction of the two new autonomous regions, effectively reduced the influence of Belgrade as the capital of both Serbia and Yugoslavia. Once Tito died, there would be no opportunity for a new Communist or nationalist leader of his stature to emerge under the collective arrangement. With individuals representing provincial interests, there would be little chance of swift or authoritative leadership whenever crises might call for it. After Tito’s death in 1980, the Serbs continued to be frustrated with a power-sharing arrangement where they had 40 percent of the population but only one-eighth of the vote. With veto power, any republic could override any proposed legislation, so nothing of substance came out of the government

33 Background to the Crisis in Bosnia
As both Yugoslavia’s economy and Communism declined in the late 1980s, Slovenia and Croatia pressed for more autonomy, while Serbia clamored for tighter central control. The economic disparity between Croatia and Slovenia on the one hand, and Serbia on the other exacerbated these tensions. Serbia had half the per capita gross national product of Croatia and Slovenia. The richer republics in the north were not happy to see their tax revenue going into coffers in Belgrade or supporting a national army that did not have their republics’ best interests at heart. The republics in the south wanted to see a redistribution of wealth. The army, including the officer corps, was a demographically ethnic mirror of Yugoslavia throughout the Tito years. Serbs represented about 40 percent of the nation’s population, and that percentage was generally maintained in the military force.

34 Background to the Crisis in Bosnia
As the nation broke apart, the percentage of Serbs increased proportionately as the other republics’ soldiers resigned or deserted from the national army. Therefore Serbian dominance within the contemporary Yugoslav army grew primarily by default.  The 1980s represented a period of economic turmoil within Yugoslavia and continuing ethnic problems within the autonomous province of Kosovo. Ninety percent of Kosovo’s population was ethnically Albanian and wanted to merge with Albania, where they felt their rights would be better protected. Yugoslavia, with its historic and symbolic ties to Kosovo, would never let this happen 

35 Background to the Crisis in Bosnia
Periodically, the JNA (Yugoslav National Army) mobilized in Kosovo, throughout both the Tito and post-Tito eras, to quell ethnic unrest there. Politically, anytime a vote came up in the collective Communist leadership, the Kosovo representative could always be counted on to vote against any measure of substance the Serbians favored. In 1987, an ambitious Communist party official, Slobodan Milosevic, went to Kosovo from Belgrade to investigate a charge made by the Albanians of human rights violations committed by the minority Serbs living there. Instead, he sided with his brother Serbs, who felt they were being mistreated, and made a famous speech that propelled him to ultimate leadership within the Yugoslav Communist Party. Milosevic told the Serbs in Kosovo that they would not be treated as minorities within their own country, because he would not allow this to happen. “You will not be beaten again” was his battle cry.

36 The Balkans: A Brief History
After World War II, monarchy abolished; Communist Party leader Tito proclaimed the country the Federal People's Republic of Yugoslavia, with himself as prime Minister Eliminating opposition, the Tito gov’t executed Mihajlovic in 1946 Tito died in 1980, and the fragility of the federation he ruled quickly became apparent

37 Three Ethnic Groups In Conflict
Serbs—Dominant in Yugoslavia's politics and army, orthodox Christianity makes them natural allies of Russia Croats—Roman Catholics, closer to the West than Serbs and exposed to Western Influences Muslims—Living mainly in ethnically mixed towns and cities in Bosnia-Herzegovina

38

39 Operation DENY FLIGHT Oct 1992, UN Security Council Resolution 781 established a no-fly zone over Bosnia-Herzegovina Operation DENY FLIGHT Enforced the no-fly zone Provided close air support to UN troops Conducted approved air strikes under a dual-key command arrangement with the UN 28 Feb 1994, NATO aircraft shot down four warplanes violating the no-fly zone over Bosnia-Herzegovina This was the first military engagement ever undertaken by the Alliance

40 Operation DENY FLIGHT NATO objectives
Bosnian Serb compliance to cease attacks on Sarajevo and other safe areas Withdrawal of Bosnian Serb heavy weapons from the total exclusion zone around Sarajevo Complete freedom of movement for UN Forces and personnel, and nongovernment officials Unrestricted use of Sarajevo airport

41 Operation DENY FLIGHT NATO missions of Operation DENY FLIGHT
To conduct aerial monitoring and enforce compliance with UN Security Council Resolution 816 To provide close air support for UN troops on the ground at the request of, and controlled by, UN forces To conduct approved air strikes against designated targets threatening the security of the UN-declared safe areas

42 Operation DENY FLIGHT Operation DENY FLIGHT lasted from 12 Apr Dec 1995 Almost 100,000 sorties flown A formal closure ceremony was held in Vicenza, Italy on 21 Dec 1995 Forces associated with Operation DENY FLIGHT were then transferred to Operation DECISIVE ENDEAVOR as part of the overall NATO operation JOINT ENDEAVOR.

43 The Crisis in Bosnia: Lessons Learned
Lack of doctrine Tactical air and space power problems Bases weren’t large enough to accept the contingency surges Coalition/Joint problems Technological problems

44 Kosovo Operation ALLIED FORCE. Kosovo lies in southern Serbia and has a mixed population, the majority of which are ethnic Albanians. Until 1989, the region enjoyed a high degree of autonomy within the former Yugoslavia, but then Serbian leader Slobodan Milosevic altered the status of the region, removing its autonomy, and bringing it under the direct control of Belgrade, the Serbian capital. The Kosovar Albanians strenuously opposed this move. During 1998, open conflict between Serbian military and police forces and Kosovar Albanian forces resulted in the deaths of over 1,500 Kosovar Albanians and forced 400,000 people from their homes. The international community became gravely concerned about the escalating conflict, its humanitarian consequences, and the risk of it spreading to other countries. President Milosevic’s disregard for diplomatic peace-making efforts and the destabilizing role of militant Kosovar Albanian forces were also of concern

45 Kosovo Kosovo was once an autonomous province of Yugoslavia, with a functioning, multiethnic government. When Milosevic took away that autonomy he implemented apartheid-like policies that excluded Kosovar Albanians from virtually all positions of responsibility. In 1989, President George H.W. Bush warned Milosevic of the consequences of Serb violence against, or forced expulsion of, Kosovar Albanians. In 1998, this discrimination turned into systematic violence against the Kosovar Albanians, precipitating the crisis that forced NATO to act on both diplomatic and military fronts. In October 1998, under pressure of impending NATO military action, Milosevic agreed to deployments of international observers into Kosovo, and the violence subsided significantly; but, by late winter, the violence had resumed. NATO was again reviewing military options, and the parties were summoned to negotiations at Rambouillet, France. The negotiations ultimately failed because of Serb inflexibility. On 21 March 1999, the international community initiated one last diplomatic effort. Ambassador Holbrooke was dispatched to Belgrade to deliver a warning to Milosevic.

46 Kosovo On 22 March, in response to Belgrade’s continued intransigence and repression, and in view of the worsening of the situation on the ground in Kosovo, the North Atlantic Council (NAC) gave NATO Secretary General Solana authority, subject to consultations with the allies, to order a phased air operation. Ambassador Holbrooke departed Belgrade on 23 March having received no concessions of any kind from Milosevic, which then led Secretary General Solana to direct General Wesley Clark, Supreme Allied Commander Europe (SACEUR), to initiate air operations in the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia (FRY). On 24 March 1999, the United States and its NATO allies turned from a path of diplomacy backed by the threat of force to a military campaign supported by diplomacy.

47 KOSOVO

48 Kosovo Crisis Kosovo lies in southern Serbia and has a mixed population, the majority of which are ethnic Albanians (Muslims) Serbian leader Slobodan Milosevic altered the status of the region, removing its autonomy and bringing it under the direct control of Belgrade, the Serbian capital The Kosovar Albanians strenuously opposed the move

49 United States & NATO Interests at Stake
Serb aggression threatened peace throughout the Balkans and the stability of NATO’s SE region Belgrade’s repression in Kosovo created a humanitarian crisis of staggering proportions President Milosevic’s conduct directly challenged the credibility of NATO

50 NATO Action After the failure of repeated international diplomatic efforts since the spring of 1998 to peacefully resolve the conflict in Kosovo North Atlantic Council decided on 23 March 1999 to authorize NATO air strikes Aimed at strategic targets in the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia to end the repression of Kosovar Albanians by the Yugoslav government

51 NATO’s Objectives A stop to all military action and the immediate ending of violence and repression The withdrawal from Kosovo of the military, police, and paramilitary forces The stationing in Kosovo of an international military presence

52 NATO’s Objectives (cont’d)
The unconditional and safe return of all refugees and displaced persons Establish political framework agreement for Kosovo in conformity with international law

53 Allied Force Begins The campaign over Kosovo was not a traditional military conflict. There was no direct clash of massed military forces in Operation ALLIED FORCE. Milosevic was unable to challenge superior allied military capabilities directly. Therefore, he chose to fight chiefly through indirect means: use of terror tactics against Kosovar civilians, attempts to exploit the premium the alliance placed on minimizing civilian casualties and collateral damage, creation of enormous refugee flows to create a humanitarian crisis, and the conduct of disinformation and propaganda campaigns.

54 Allied Force Begins Milosevic’s military forces were forced into hiding throughout most of the campaign, staying in caves and tunnels and under the cover of forest, village, or weather. He was forced to husband his antiaircraft missile defenses to sustain his challenge to our air campaign. He chose his tactics in the hope of exploiting our legitimate political concerns about target selection, collateral damage, and conducting military operations against enemy forces intermingled with civilian refugees. Despite all these efforts, he failed.

55 Significance of Air Power in Allied Force
B-2s make combat debut 30 hour flight JDAM technology enables all weather bombing F-117s used in majority of strike packages Lost F-117 and recovered pilot

56 Significance of Air Power in Allied Force
UAVs: Provided target information Conducted battle damage assessment Monitored refugees ISR synchronized combat operations

57 NATO’s Strategic Objectives
Demonstrate the seriousness of their opposition to Belgrade’s aggression in the Balkans Deter Milosevic’s attacks on helpless civilians, and reverse ethnic cleansing Damage Serbia’s capacity to wage war against Kosovo

58 Military Objective “Degrade and damage the military and security structure President Milosevic has used to depopulate and destroy the Albanian majority in Kosovo.” William Cohen, SECDEF 15 April 1999

59 Lessons Learned on Kosovo War Objectives
US Grand Strategy Maintain a peaceful, prosperous US-led Europe Convince NATO to transition from old Cold War common defense against external threats to new Continental security coalition Persuade NATO to acquire means and will to conduct out of area military ops European Strategy Maintain a peaceful, prosperous, and independent Europe Prevent spillover into Albania and Macedonia, then to Greece and Turkey Maintain NATO relationship with Russia and give it a role in helping end the crisis Demonstrate European unity Kosovo War Aims Stop the Serbian slaughter and expulsion of ethnic Albanians Remove Milosevic from power Accomplish the above with minimal collateral damage and NATO casualties Common Effort Concealed Widely Differing Objectives

60 Lessons Learned by US Military
United States air refuelers were stretched thin during operation Force structure numbers and resources were inadequate for current level of commitments (all services); support and training as important to victory as strike Older platforms with smart weapons may be seen as good enough; smart weapons may be better than smart platforms Need the right force structure for the future C4ISR is currently the weakest link in joint and coalition ops On the brink of another “hollow force”

61 Political Lessons Learned by Europeans
Militarily, Europe remains dependent on Americans Best technology, weapons, and platforms “Made in USA.” Politicians unwilling to pay the cost of matching unique US capabilities United States cannot always be counted on to serve the Alliance’s interests US focus shifted with opinion polls Fear US commitment could falter if US forces take heavy casualties

62 More Political Lessons Learned by Europeans
European Union can provide diplomatic muscle (Martti Ahtisaari saves the day); many foreign policy interests are similar among EU Nations Threat of rising Islamic fundamentalism Humanitarian (ethnic cleansing) Need to build external identity Europe can overcome internal diversity to maintain cohesion German Luftwaffe conducted first combat missions since 1945 Greece provided logistical support despite popular opposition Italy and France (which have Communist ministers) offered air bases

63 Impact of Kosovo Lessons Learned on Future DOD Budget Trends
No DOD/Allied spending surge like post-Desert Storm International defense market continues to shrink Readiness and retention will increasingly consume $$$$ for modernization Inevitable tax cut legislation will further erode DOD budgets Services must eventually deal with the bow wave Old platforms with smart weapons were good enough Congress may balk at big bills for new platforms (JSF, F-22, CVX, DD-21) Support forces will need big $$$$ too “We have to make a trade between smart weapons and platforms...We need to encourage the services to concentrate more on smart weapons.” Jacques Gansler Former Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics

64 Evolution of Airpower What were significant airpower achievements and changes during this period? Who were some of the key leaders? What doctrinal changes occurred during this period?

65 Air Power during the 1990s Key People Gen McPeak Lt. Gen Horner
Col Warden Key Weapons Precision Guided Munitions Stealth Technology UAVs and Space Technology Key Doctrinal Focus Precision Engagement Air Superiority Building Partnerships

66 Summary I Gulf War Background The Enemy The Plan of Attack
Objectives Concept of Operations Five Strategic Rings Targets Phases of the Campaign Operations PROVIDE COMFORT/NORTHERN WATCH The Conflict and Lessons Learned

67 Summary II Operation SOUTHERN WATCH History of the Balkans
The Conflict and Lessons Learned History of the Balkans Background Ethnic Groups

68 Summary III Operation DENY FLIGHT Operation ALLIED FORCE
The Conflict and Lessons Learned Operation ALLIED FORCE Background NATO Actions Operation ALLIED FORCE Begins Lessons learned by US Military Political Lessons Learned Impact of Lessons Learned on Future DOD Budget Evolution of Airpower


Download ppt "Airpower in the Post Cold War"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google