1. Jean Brown Superintendent, Local District 1 September 2007
Leadership in the Use and Analysis of Student Data
Jean Brown
Superintendent, Local District 1
September 2007

2. Theory of Action Curriculum and Instruction Professional Development
Coaching
Use of Periodic Assessment Data
Teacher Collaboration
Administrative Leadership
Personalization

3. 2005 – 2006 Understanding Systems for Continuous Improvement

4. 2006 - 2007 Leadership in the Development and Delivery of High-Quality Professional Development

5. 2007 – 2008 Leadership in the Use and Analysis of Student Data

6. Attendance Data

7. Local District 1 Attendance Data
2005
2006
Change
Elementary
95.42
95.93
+0.51
Middle
94.52
95.43
+0.91
High
91.13
92.56
+1.43
Continuation
97.61
97.54
-0.07

8. Reclassification Data

11. Percentage of English Learners Reclassified to English Proficient
K-12
District 1
2.6%
4.6%
7.7%
11%
14.9%
LAUSD
2.1%
4.2%
9.5%
13.6%
Elementary 3% 4%
5.5% 9%
13.2%
2.4%
4.5%
6.5%
8.6%
13.3%
Middle School 2%
7.6%
16.7%
22.4%
5.6%
15.8%
18.1%
Senior High
1.6%
3.6%
9.3%
11.4%
12.7%
1.7%
2.8%
6.9%
9.7%

12. AYP and API
AYP measures students moving from basic, below basic, and far below basic to proficient and advanced performance levels.
API measures student movement between all performance levels. The greatest growth occurs as students move from far below basic to below basic and from below basic to basic.

13. API Data

15. Elementary School API
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
STATE
629
674
691
699
729
731
750
758
766
LAUSD
489
537
592
643
682
692
707
718
LD 1
601
675
720
760
802
807
805

17. Middle School API 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 STATE
631
656
669
666
686
697
714
722
727
LAUSD
491
516
526
555
589
609
620
634
LD 1
624
633
664
700
709
721
735
738

19. High School API
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
STATE
620
638
636
631
662
680
693
702
LAUSD
518
546
549
561
599
607
622
602
616
LD 1
573
619
644
689
692
703

20. Elementary Schools With the Greatest API Gains in 2007
Napa +70 Canoga Park +30
Plummer Lassen +30
Newcastle Rosa Parks +29
Sunny Brae +39 Ranchito +27
Noble Blythe +25
Chatsworth Park +36 Beckford +24
Van Gogh +33 Granada +22
Bertrand +32 Haynes +22
Langdon +31 Gledhill +21
Dearborn +30

21. Secondary Schools With the Greatest API Gains in 2007
Reseda HS +35
Vista MS +21
Chatsworth HS +17
Kennedy HS +17
Sherman Oaks CES +16
El Camino HS +11
Taft HS
Lawrence MS +8
Cleveland HS +7

22. Small Schools With Great API Gains in 2007
Addams
Kirk Douglas +108
Cal Burke
Zane Grey
Lull Sp Ed Center
Leichman HS
Miller HS
West Valley Sp Ed Center +89

23. Elementary Schools With an API of 800-899
Pomelo 896
Nestle 878
El Oro 876
Serrania 874
Superior 871
Vintage 862
Topeka 861
Hamlin 860
Calabash 855
Justice 853
Woodlake 851
Haynes 849
Lockhurst 848
Darby 846
Knollwood 842
Encino 842
Andasol 839
Stagg 839

24. Elementary Schools With an API of 800-899
Dearborn 837
Lemay 836
Calahan 832
Lorne 830
Emelita 828
Danube 827
Germain 827
Tarzana 819
Tulsa 818
San Jose 815
Mayall 806
Haskell 804
Granada 800

25. Secondary Schools with an API Score of 800-899
Sherman Oaks CES 845
Noble Middle
High Tech High 819

26. Elementary Schools With an API Over 900
Balboa Magnet 982
Woodland Hills 958
Welby Way 921
Lanai Road 920
Castlebay Lane 917
Beckford
Wilbur
Van Gogh 900

27. AYP

28. The following schools made AYP and are on “HOLD”
Bertrand Elementary
Napa Elementary
Noble Elementary
Plummer Elementary
Primary Academy for Success
Winnetka Elementary

29. West Valley Sp. Ed. Center
The Following Schools Made AYP and Have EXITED Program Improvement Status
Anatola Elementary
Birmingham HS
Taft HS
West Valley Sp. Ed. Center

30. CST Data

31. Local District 1 CST Percentage of Students Scoring Proficient/Advanced ELEMENTARY ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS,

32. Local District 1 CST Percentage of Students Scoring Proficient/Advanced, MIDDLE SCHOOL ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS,

33. Local District 1 CST Percentage of Students Scoring Proficient/Advanced, HIGH SCHOOL ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS,

34. Local District 1 California Standards Test
Percentage of Students Scoring Proficient/Advanced,
Local District 1
LAUSD
Subject
CST
Percent Proficient or Advanced
Change in Percentage
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
06-07
03-07
Engish/ Language Arts
Grade 2 40 48 51 54 3 14 4
Grade 3 36 31 34 39 1 5
Grade 4 41 53 2 12
Grade 5 38 42 44 43 46 8 7
Grade 6 37 35 -1
Grade 7 45 10
Grade 8 30 33 -2
Grade 9 9 6
Grade 10
Grade 11

35. Local District 1 CST Percentage of Students Scoring Proficient/Advanced, ELEMENTARY MATH, 2003-2007

36. Local District 1 CST Percentage of Students Scoring Proficient/Advanced, MIDDLE SCHOOL MATH,

37. Local District 1 CST Percentage of Students Scoring Proficient/Advanced, HIGH SCHOOL MATH, 2003-2007

38. Local District 1 California Standards Test
Percentage of Students Scoring Proficient/Advanced,
Local District 1
LAUSD
Subject
CST
Percent Proficient or Advanced
Change in
Percentage
Change in Percentage
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
06-07
03-07
Math
Grade 2 53 58 59 63 64 1 11 9
Grade 3 52 54 62 12 3 15
Grade 4 56 60 61 5 10
Grade 5 45 47 55 13
Grade 6 32 37 39 40 -3 -1 8
Grade 7 30 33 36 6 -2 7
General Math 16 20 23 18 -5 2
Algebra 1 25 19 27 4
Geometry 26
Algebra 2 31 28 -4
HS Sum. 51 48

39. Local District 1 California Standards Test
Percentage of Students Scoring Proficient/Advanced,
Local District 1
LAUSD
Subject
CST
Percent Proficient or Advanced
Change in
Percentage
Change in Percentage
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
06-07
03-07
Science
Grade 5 - 26 32 35 42 7 6
Grade 8 40 2 5
Grade 10 30 1
ICS 1 4 10 3
Biology 33 27 -1
Chemistry 31 28 17 22 -9 -5
Physics 39 38 29 25 -2 -7
Earth Sci. 19 23 21 11

40. Local District 1 California Standards Test
Percentage of Students Scoring Proficient/Advanced,
Local District 1
LAUSD
Subject
CST
Percent Proficient or Advanced
Change in
Percentage
Change in Percentage
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
06-07
03-07
History/ Social Studies
Grade 8 29 28 30 35 6 1 5
Grade 10 27 31 25 -4 -3
Grade 11 40 39 41 37 2 -2

41. Assessment

42. TWO TYPES OF ASSESSMENT Assessment OF Learning Assessment FOR Learning

43. Assessment OF Learning Summative Assessment California Standards Test CAHSEE CAT 6 Course Final Exam
Provides information for program evaluation
Provides judgmental feedback
Provides feedback for audits and reviews
Provides accountability information, e.g., NCLB

44. Assessment FOR Learning Formative Assessment LAUSD Periodic Assessments Well-crafted, teacher-made assessments
Promotes student reflective learning
Measures short-term student progress
Informs teacher practice and professional development
Serves as a tool for supervision of instruction by providing measures of student progress

45. Using Periodic Assessments to Help Sustain School Improvement
Bill Saunders
Pearson Achievement Solutions