Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Field Performance Assessment of

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Field Performance Assessment of"— Presentation transcript:

1 Field Performance Assessment of
Pretreatment Practices for Bioretention Andy Erickson, Research Associate St. Anthony Falls Lab, University of Minnesota Minnesota Stormwater Research Council June 27, Minneapolis, MN

2 Bioretention Practices
Shallow Depressions Infiltrate Stormwater Runoff Aesthetic Amenity Maintenance?

3 Bioretention Maintenance
Inspection, Inspection and Maintenance of pretreatment unit(s), Pruning, Mowing, Mulching, Watering (first 1-2 months), Vegetation Replacement, Weeding, Trash Removal, Clear Outlet Structures, Sediment Removal.

4 Study Objectives Synthetic runoff testing to measure removal of sediment and gross solids Rock-lined inlet Grass-lined inlet Rain Guardian Bunker Rain Guardian Turret (matching funds) Non-proprietary Sump/Trench (optional) Report results as mass-based percent removal

5 Study Site – Anoka, MN 600 ft2 Surface Area 10.5 ac drainage Area

6 Study Site Adaptations

7 Preparation for Testing
Test Flow Rates = 0.25 cfs & 0.5 cfs

8 Preparation for Testing
Sediment conc. = ~160 mg/L d50 = 1.17mm; d50 = 0.41mm; d50 = 0.12mm Gross Solids Conc. = ~40mg/L

9 Post-Test Quantification
Rock-Lined Inlet Known feed & pre-rinsed rock (influent) Remove and rinse rock (captured) Remove and clean fabric (captured)

10 Rock Cleaning

11 Post-Test Quantification
Grass-Lined Inlet Known feed & pre-rinsed grass (influent) Remove and clean fabric downstream of grass-lined inlet (effluent or bypass)

12 Gross Solids Feed

13 Tests to Date Rock-lined Inlet Grass-lined Inlet 0.25 cfs x 2 reps
Procedure Clean site Install pretreatment Pre-rinse, clean Test Collect sediment & gross solids Prepare for next test, or restore site Rock-lined Inlet 0.25 cfs x 2 reps 0.5 cfs x 2 reps Grass-lined Inlet 0.25 cfs x 2 reps 0.5 cfs x 2 reps

14 Field Tests

15 Preliminary Results Rock-Lined Inlet

16 Preliminary Results Grass-Lined Inlet

17 Summary Approximately 50% of proposed field testing has been completed (analysis still required) Preliminary results suggest Rock-lined and Grass-lined inlets capture sediment and gross solids Next Steps: Complete testing, Consider optional testing, Analyze results, Write report Outreach (LID 2018, WRC, O&M of SCMs 2019, etc.)

18 Acknowledgements THANK YOU!! Collaborators:
SAFL: Matt Hernick, Rob Gabrielson, Peter Olson Anoka Conservation District: Chris Lord, Jared Wagner, Green Corps Sponsors & Partners: Minnesota Stormwater Research Council (MSRC), Anoka Conservation District, City of Anoka THANK YOU!!

19 Thanks for your attention! Questions? Andy Erickson eric0706@umn.edu


Download ppt "Field Performance Assessment of"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google