Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byShon Fowler Modified over 6 years ago
1
Urban Charter Schools IMPACT in Florida March 2015
2
Notice This presentation contains interactive graphics which should be viewed in the context of a powerpoint presentation. Viewing presentation as static slides will cause some data to be hidden from the viewer and may cause labels to appear with the wrong graph.
3
Impact Research Questions
This impact study answers the following questions: How does the academic progress of charter school students compare to their traditional public school (TPS) counterparts in Florida? We examine: Total average academic growth for all charter students relative to TPS Average academic growth for charter school students for separate time periods Charter school student growth by elementary / middle / high school grade levels Charter school student growth by prior year academic achievement Charter school student growth by the major student subgroups Charter school student growth by the number of years student continuously attended charter schools For the group of charter schools in Fort Myers, Jacksonville, Miami, Orlando, Saint Petersburg, Tampa and West Palm Beach, how do they perform compared to their peer schools in the same community?
4
A Quick Word About Methods
Charter school students may be different than a typical student in TPS, so care is needed in testing their learning gains. We use a “Virtual Twin” approach to match each charter school’s students to TPS students who look just like them drawn from the TPS schools that have lost students to the charter school. A Technical Appendix provides a full explanation of our research methodology.
5
A Quick Word About Methods
Unlike other recent CREDO studies, this study does not include a conversion of effect sizes to days of learning. As the days of learning computation is based on the national NAEP scores, it would not be appropriate to apply it to the limited regional samples which almost certainly DO NOT progress at the same rate as the national population.
6
Understanding the Slides
Average Academic Growth for Charter School students relative to performance of Virtual Twins in Traditional Public Schools in Urban Region– There are two growth values for reading. The left is for TPS students and the right for Charter students There are also two growth values for math. As before, the left is for TPS students and the right for Charter students These are the marginal effects of charter enrollment. The left is for reading and the right for math. This graph looks at the difference between the charter and TPS growth values. 0.03 – 0.08 - 0.05 -0.01 – 0.05 - 0.06 Average TPS Growth Average TPS Growth To compute the difference, we take the Charter growth value minus the TPS growth value for each subject.
7
FORT MYERS Results
8
Student-Level Results
Average Academic Growth for Charter School students relative to performance of Virtual Twins in Traditional Public Schools in Fort Myers – ALL STUDENTS Average TPS Growth Average TPS Growth
9
Student-Level Results
Average Academic Growth for Charter School students relative to performance of Virtual Twins in Traditional Public Schools in Fort Myers – ALL STUDENTS by Growth Period Average TPS Growth
10
Student-Level Results
Average Academic Growth for Charter School students relative to performance of Virtual Twins in Traditional Public Schools in Fort Myers – ALL STUDENTS by Gradespan Average Elementary TPS Growth ‡ There were not enough Fort Myers Multi-level students in Reading or Math to compute an effect size.
11
Student-Level Results
Average Academic Growth for Charter School students relative to performance of Virtual Twins in Traditional Public Schools in Fort Myers – ALL STUDENTS by Years of Charter School Enrollment Average TPS Growth This analysis includes only students who entered a charter school after ‡ There were not enough Fort Myers students enrolled in charters for 4 years in Math to compute an effect size.
12
Student-Level Results
Average Academic Growth for Charter School students relative to performance of Virtual Twins in Traditional Public Schools in Fort Myers – ALL WHITE STUDENTS Average White TPS Growth Average White TPS Growth
13
Student-Level Results
Average Academic Growth for Charter School students relative to performance of Virtual Twins in Traditional Public Schools in Fort Myers – ALL ASIAN STUDENTS Average White TPS Growth Average Asian TPS Growth
14
Student-Level Results
Average Academic Growth for Charter School students relative to performance of Virtual Twins in Traditional Public Schools in Fort Myers – ALL NATIVE AMERICAN STUDENTS Average White TPS Growth Average Native American TPS Growth ‡ There were not enough Fort Myers Native American students in Reading or Math to compute an effect size.
15
Student-Level Results
Average Academic Growth for Charter School students relative to performance of Virtual Twins in Traditional Public Schools in Fort Myers – ALL BLACK STUDENTS Average White TPS Growth Average Black TPS Growth
16
Student-Level Results
Average Academic Growth for Charter School students relative to performance of Virtual Twins in Traditional Public Schools in Fort Myers – ALL HISPANIC STUDENTS Average White TPS Growth Average Hispanic TPS Growth
17
Student-Level Results
Average Academic Growth for Charter School students relative to performance of Virtual Twins in Traditional Public Schools in Fort Myers – ALL STUDENTS ELIGIBLE FOR FREE / REDUCED PRICE LUNCH Average Non-Poverty TPS Growth Average TPS in Poverty Growth
18
Student-Level Results
Average Academic Growth for Charter School students relative to performance of Virtual Twins in Traditional Public Schools in Fort Myers – ALL BLACK STUDENTS in POVERTY Average White, Non-Poverty TPS Growth
19
Student-Level Results
Average Academic Growth for Charter School students relative to performance of Virtual Twins in Traditional Public Schools in Fort Myers – ALL HISPANIC STUDENTS in POVERTY Average White Non-Poverty TPS Growth
20
Student-Level Results
Average Academic Growth for Charter School students relative to performance of Virtual Twins in Traditional Public Schools in Fort Myers – ALL ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS Average Non-ELL TPS Growth Average ELL TPS Growth ‡ There were not enough Fort Myers English Language Learners in Reading or Math to compute an effect size.
21
Student-Level Results
Average Academic Growth for Charter School students relative to performance of Virtual Twins in Traditional Public Schools in Fort Myers – ALL STUDENTS with SPECIAL EDUCATION NEEDS Average Non-SPED TPS Growth Average SPED TPS Growth
22
Student-Level Results
Average Academic Growth for Charter School students relative to performance of Virtual Twins in Traditional Public Schools in Fort Myers – ALL STUDENTS WHO WERE RETAINED IN PRIOR YEAR Average Non-Retained TPS Growth Average Retained TPS Growth ‡ There were not enough Fort Myers retained students in Reading or Math to compute an effect size.
23
JACKSONVILLE Results
24
Student-Level Results
Average Academic Growth for Charter School students relative to performance of Virtual Twins in Traditional Public Schools in Jacksonville– ALL STUDENTS Average TPS Growth Average TPS Growth
25
Student-Level Results
Average Academic Growth for Charter School students relative to performance of Virtual Twins in Traditional Public Schools in Jacksonville– ALL STUDENTS by Growth Period Average TPS Growth
26
Student-Level Results
Average Academic Growth for Charter School students relative to performance of Virtual Twins in Traditional Public Schools in Jacksonville– ALL STUDENTS by Gradespan Average Elementary TPS Growth ‡ There were not enough Jacksonville Multi-level students in Reading or Math to compute an effect size.
27
Student-Level Results
Average Academic Growth for Charter School students relative to performance of Virtual Twins in Traditional Public Schools in Jacksonville– ALL STUDENTS by Years of Charter School Enrollment Average TPS Growth This analysis includes only students who entered a charter school after
28
Student-Level Results
Average Academic Growth for Charter School students relative to performance of Virtual Twins in Traditional Public Schools in Jacksonville– ALL WHITE STUDENTS Average White TPS Growth Average White TPS Growth
29
Student-Level Results
Average Academic Growth for Charter School students relative to performance of Virtual Twins in Traditional Public Schools in Jacksonville– ALL ASIAN STUDENTS Average White TPS Growth Average Asian TPS Growth
30
Student-Level Results
Average Academic Growth for Charter School students relative to performance of Virtual Twins in Traditional Public Schools in Jacksonville– ALL NATIVE AMERICAN STUDENTS Average White TPS Growth Average Native American TPS Growth ‡ There were not enough Jacksonville Native American students in Reading or Math to compute an effect size.
31
Student-Level Results
Average Academic Growth for Charter School students relative to performance of Virtual Twins in Traditional Public Schools in Jacksonville– ALL BLACK STUDENTS Average White TPS Growth Average Black TPS Growth
32
Student-Level Results
Average Academic Growth for Charter School students relative to performance of Virtual Twins in Traditional Public Schools in Jacksonville– ALL HISPANIC STUDENTS Average White TPS Growth Average Hispanic TPS Growth
33
Student-Level Results
Average Academic Growth for Charter School students relative to performance of Virtual Twins in Traditional Public Schools in Jacksonville– ALL STUDENTS ELIGIBLE FOR FREE / REDUCED PRICE LUNCH Average Non-Poverty TPS Growth Average TPS in Poverty Growth
34
Student-Level Results
Average Academic Growth for Charter School students relative to performance of Virtual Twins in Traditional Public Schools in Jacksonville– ALL BLACK STUDENTS in POVERTY Average White, Non-Poverty TPS Growth
35
Student-Level Results
Average Academic Growth for Charter School students relative to performance of Virtual Twins in Traditional Public Schools in Jacksonville– ALL HISPANIC STUDENTS in POVERTY Average White Non-Poverty TPS Growth
36
Student-Level Results
Average Academic Growth for Charter School students relative to performance of Virtual Twins in Traditional Public Schools in Jacksonville– ALL ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS Average Non-SPED TPS Growth Average SPED TPS Growth
37
Student-Level Results
Average Academic Growth for Charter School students relative to performance of Virtual Twins in Traditional Public Schools in Jacksonville– ALL STUDENTS with SPECIAL EDUCATION NEEDS Average Non-SPED TPS Growth Average SPED TPS Growth
38
Student-Level Results
Average Academic Growth for Charter School students relative to performance of Virtual Twins in Traditional Public Schools in Jacksonville– ALL STUDENTS WHO WERE RETAINED IN PRIOR YEAR Average Non-Retained TPS Growth Average Retained TPS Growth
39
MIAMI Results
40
Student-Level Results
Average Academic Growth for Charter School students relative to performance of Virtual Twins in Traditional Public Schools in Miami – ALL STUDENTS Average TPS Growth Average TPS Growth
41
Student-Level Results
Average Academic Growth for Charter School students relative to performance of Virtual Twins in Traditional Public Schools in Miami – ALL STUDENTS by Growth Period Average TPS Growth
42
Student-Level Results
Average Academic Growth for Charter School students relative to performance of Virtual Twins in Traditional Public Schools in Miami – ALL STUDENTS by Gradespan Average Elementary TPS Growth ‡ There were not enough Miami Multi-level students in Reading or Math to compute an effect size.
43
Student-Level Results
Average Academic Growth for Charter School students relative to performance of Virtual Twins in Traditional Public Schools in Miami – ALL STUDENTS by Years of Charter School Enrollment Average TPS Growth This analysis includes only students who entered a charter school after
44
Student-Level Results
Average Academic Growth for Charter School students relative to performance of Virtual Twins in Traditional Public Schools in Miami – ALL WHITE STUDENTS Average White TPS Growth Average White TPS Growth
45
Student-Level Results
Average Academic Growth for Charter School students relative to performance of Virtual Twins in Traditional Public Schools in Miami – ALL ASIAN STUDENTS Average White TPS Growth Average Asian TPS Growth ‡ There were not enough Miami Asian students in Reading or Math to compute an effect size.
46
Student-Level Results
Average Academic Growth for Charter School students relative to performance of Virtual Twins in Traditional Public Schools in Miami – ALL NATIVE AMERICAN STUDENTS Average White TPS Growth Average Native American TPS Growth ‡ There were not enough Miami Native American students in Reading or Math to compute an effect size.
47
Student-Level Results
Average Academic Growth for Charter School students relative to performance of Virtual Twins in Traditional Public Schools in Miami – ALL BLACK STUDENTS Average White TPS Growth Average Black TPS Growth
48
Student-Level Results
Average Academic Growth for Charter School students relative to performance of Virtual Twins in Traditional Public Schools in Miami – ALL HISPANIC STUDENTS Average White TPS Growth Average Hispanic TPS Growth
49
Student-Level Results
Average Academic Growth for Charter School students relative to performance of Virtual Twins in Traditional Public Schools in Miami – ALL STUDENTS ELIGIBLE FOR FREE / REDUCED PRICE LUNCH Average Non-Poverty TPS Growth Average TPS in Poverty Growth
50
Student-Level Results
Average Academic Growth for Charter School students relative to performance of Virtual Twins in Traditional Public Schools in Miami – ALL BLACK STUDENTS in POVERTY Average White, Non-Poverty TPS Growth
51
Student-Level Results
Average Academic Growth for Charter School students relative to performance of Virtual Twins in Traditional Public Schools in Miami – ALL HISPANIC STUDENTS in POVERTY Average White Non-Poverty TPS Growth
52
Student-Level Results
Average Academic Growth for Charter School students relative to performance of Virtual Twins in Traditional Public Schools in Miami – ALL ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS Average Non-ELL TPS Growth Average ELL TPS Growth
53
Student-Level Results
Average Academic Growth for Charter School students relative to performance of Virtual Twins in Traditional Public Schools in Miami – ALL STUDENTS with SPECIAL EDUCATION NEEDS Average Non-SPED TPS Growth Average SPED TPS Growth
54
Student-Level Results
Average Academic Growth for Charter School students relative to performance of Virtual Twins in Traditional Public Schools in Miami – ALL STUDENTS WHO WERE RETAINED IN PRIOR YEAR Average Non-Retained TPS Growth Average Retained TPS Growth
55
ORLANDO Results
56
Student-Level Results
Average Academic Growth for Charter School students relative to performance of Virtual Twins in Traditional Public Schools in Orlando – ALL STUDENTS Average TPS Growth Average TPS Growth
57
Student-Level Results
Average Academic Growth for Charter School students relative to performance of Virtual Twins in Traditional Public Schools in Orlando – ALL STUDENTS by Growth Period Average TPS Growth
58
Student-Level Results
Average Academic Growth for Charter School students relative to performance of Virtual Twins in Traditional Public Schools in Orlando – ALL STUDENTS by Gradespan Average Elementary TPS Growth
59
Student-Level Results
Average Academic Growth for Charter School students relative to performance of Virtual Twins in Traditional Public Schools in Orlando – ALL STUDENTS by Years of Charter School Enrollment Average TPS Growth This analysis includes only students who entered a charter school after ‡ There were not enough Fort Myers students enrolled in charters for 4 years in Math to compute an effect size.
60
Student-Level Results
Average Academic Growth for Charter School students relative to performance of Virtual Twins in Traditional Public Schools in Orlando – ALL WHITE STUDENTS Average White TPS Growth Average White TPS Growth
61
Student-Level Results
Average Academic Growth for Charter School students relative to performance of Virtual Twins in Traditional Public Schools in Orlando – ALL ASIAN STUDENTS Average White TPS Growth Average Asian TPS Growth ‡ There were not enough Orlando Asian students in Math to compute an effect size.
62
Student-Level Results
Average Academic Growth for Charter School students relative to performance of Virtual Twins in Traditional Public Schools in Orlando – ALL NATIVE AMERICAN STUDENTS Average White TPS Growth Average Native American TPS Growth ‡ There were not enough Orlando Native American students in Reading or Math to compute an effect size.
63
Student-Level Results
Average Academic Growth for Charter School students relative to performance of Virtual Twins in Traditional Public Schools in Orlando – ALL BLACK STUDENTS Average White TPS Growth Average Black TPS Growth
64
Student-Level Results
Average Academic Growth for Charter School students relative to performance of Virtual Twins in Traditional Public Schools in Orlando – ALL HISPANIC STUDENTS Average White TPS Growth Average Hispanic TPS Growth
65
Student-Level Results
Average Academic Growth for Charter School students relative to performance of Virtual Twins in Traditional Public Schools in Orlando – ALL STUDENTS ELIGIBLE FOR FREE / REDUCED PRICE LUNCH Average Non-Poverty TPS Growth Average TPS in Poverty Growth
66
Student-Level Results
Average Academic Growth for Charter School students relative to performance of Virtual Twins in Traditional Public Schools in Orlando – ALL BLACK STUDENTS in POVERTY Average White, Non-Poverty TPS Growth
67
Student-Level Results
Average Academic Growth for Charter School students relative to performance of Virtual Twins in Traditional Public Schools in Orlando – ALL HISPANIC STUDENTS in POVERTY Average White Non-Poverty TPS Growth
68
Student-Level Results
Average Academic Growth for Charter School students relative to performance of Virtual Twins in Traditional Public Schools in Orlando – ALL ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS Average Non-ELL TPS Growth Average ELL TPS Growth
69
Student-Level Results
Average Academic Growth for Charter School students relative to performance of Virtual Twins in Traditional Public Schools in Orlando – ALL STUDENTS with SPECIAL EDUCATION NEEDS Average Non-SPED TPS Growth Average SPED TPS Growth
70
Student-Level Results
Average Academic Growth for Charter School students relative to performance of Virtual Twins in Traditional Public Schools in Orlando – ALL STUDENTS WHO WERE RETAINED IN PRIOR YEAR Average Non-Retained TPS Growth Average Retained TPS Growth
71
ST. PETERSBURG Results
72
Student-Level Results
Average Academic Growth for Charter School students relative to performance of Virtual Twins in Traditional Public Schools in St. Petersburg– ALL STUDENTS Average TPS Growth Average TPS Growth
73
Student-Level Results
Average Academic Growth for Charter School students relative to performance of Virtual Twins in Traditional Public Schools in St. Petersburg– ALL STUDENTS by Growth Period Average TPS Growth
74
Student-Level Results
Average Academic Growth for Charter School students relative to performance of Virtual Twins in Traditional Public Schools in St. Petersburg– ALL STUDENTS by Gradespan Average Elementary TPS Growth ‡ There were not enough St. Petersburg Multi-level students in Reading or Math to compute an effect size.
75
Student-Level Results
Average Academic Growth for Charter School students relative to performance of Virtual Twins in Traditional Public Schools in St. Petersburg– ALL STUDENTS by Years of Charter School Enrollment Average TPS Growth This analysis includes only students who entered a charter school after
76
Student-Level Results
Average Academic Growth for Charter School students relative to performance of Virtual Twins in Traditional Public Schools in St. Petersburg– ALL WHITE STUDENTS Average White TPS Growth Average White TPS Growth
77
Student-Level Results
Average Academic Growth for Charter School students relative to performance of Virtual Twins in Traditional Public Schools in St. Petersburg– ALL ASIAN STUDENTS Average White TPS Growth Average Asian TPS Growth
78
Student-Level Results
Average Academic Growth for Charter School students relative to performance of Virtual Twins in Traditional Public Schools in St. Petersburg– ALL NATIVE AMERICAN STUDENTS Average White TPS Growth Average Native American TPS Growth ‡ There were not enough St. Petersburg Native American students in Reading or Math to compute an effect size.
79
Student-Level Results
Average Academic Growth for Charter School students relative to performance of Virtual Twins in Traditional Public Schools in St. Petersburg– ALL BLACK STUDENTS Average White TPS Growth Average Black TPS Growth
80
Student-Level Results
Average Academic Growth for Charter School students relative to performance of Virtual Twins in Traditional Public Schools in St. Petersburg– ALL HISPANIC STUDENTS Average White TPS Growth Average Hispanic TPS Growth
81
Student-Level Results
Average Academic Growth for Charter School students relative to performance of Virtual Twins in Traditional Public Schools in St. Petersburg– ALL STUDENTS ELIGIBLE FOR FREE / REDUCED PRICE LUNCH Average Non-Poverty TPS Growth Average TPS in Poverty Growth
82
Student-Level Results
Average Academic Growth for Charter School students relative to performance of Virtual Twins in Traditional Public Schools in St. Petersburg– ALL BLACK STUDENTS in POVERTY Average White, Non-Poverty TPS Growth
83
Student-Level Results
Average Academic Growth for Charter School students relative to performance of Virtual Twins in Traditional Public Schools in St. Petersburg– ALL HISPANIC STUDENTS in POVERTY Average White Non-Poverty TPS Growth
84
Student-Level Results
Average Academic Growth for Charter School students relative to performance of Virtual Twins in Traditional Public Schools in St. Petersburg– ALL ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS Average Non-ELL TPS Growth Average ELL TPS Growth ‡ There were not enough St. Petersburg English Language Learners in Reading or Math to compute an effect size.
85
Student-Level Results
Average Academic Growth for Charter School students relative to performance of Virtual Twins in Traditional Public Schools in St. Petersburg– ALL STUDENTS with SPECIAL EDUCATION NEEDS Average Non-SPED TPS Growth Average SPED TPS Growth
86
Student-Level Results
Average Academic Growth for Charter School students relative to performance of Virtual Twins in Traditional Public Schools in St. Petersburg– ALL STUDENTS WHO WERE RETAINED IN PRIOR YEAR Average Non-Retained TPS Growth Average Retained TPS Growth
87
TAMPA Results
88
Student-Level Results
Average Academic Growth for Charter School students relative to performance of Virtual Twins in Traditional Public Schools in Tampa – ALL STUDENTS Average TPS Growth Average TPS Growth
89
Student-Level Results
Average Academic Growth for Charter School students relative to performance of Virtual Twins in Traditional Public Schools in Tampa – ALL STUDENTS by Growth Period Average TPS Growth
90
Student-Level Results
Average Academic Growth for Charter School students relative to performance of Virtual Twins in Traditional Public Schools in Tampa – ALL STUDENTS by Gradespan Average Elementary TPS Growth
91
Student-Level Results
Average Academic Growth for Charter School students relative to performance of Virtual Twins in Traditional Public Schools in Tampa – ALL STUDENTS by Years of Charter School Enrollment Average TPS Growth This analysis includes only students who entered a charter school after ‡ There were not enough Tampa students enrolled in charters for 4 years in Reading or Math to compute an effect size.
92
Student-Level Results
Average Academic Growth for Charter School students relative to performance of Virtual Twins in Traditional Public Schools in Tampa – ALL WHITE STUDENTS Average White TPS Growth Average White TPS Growth
93
Student-Level Results
Average Academic Growth for Charter School students relative to performance of Virtual Twins in Traditional Public Schools in Tampa – ALL ASIAN STUDENTS Average White TPS Growth Average Asian TPS Growth ‡ There were not enough Tampa Asian students in Reading to compute an effect size.
94
Student-Level Results
Average Academic Growth for Charter School students relative to performance of Virtual Twins in Traditional Public Schools in Tampa – ALL NATIVE AMERICAN STUDENTS Average White TPS Growth Average Native American TPS Growth ‡ There were not enough Tampa Native American students in Reading or Math to compute an effect size.
95
Student-Level Results
Average Academic Growth for Charter School students relative to performance of Virtual Twins in Traditional Public Schools in Tampa – ALL BLACK STUDENTS Average White TPS Growth Average Black TPS Growth
96
Student-Level Results
Average Academic Growth for Charter School students relative to performance of Virtual Twins in Traditional Public Schools in Tampa – ALL HISPANIC STUDENTS Average White TPS Growth Average Hispanic TPS Growth
97
Student-Level Results
Average Academic Growth for Charter School students relative to performance of Virtual Twins in Traditional Public Schools in Tampa – ALL STUDENTS ELIGIBLE FOR FREE / REDUCED PRICE LUNCH Average Non-Poverty TPS Growth Average TPS in Poverty Growth
98
Student-Level Results
Average Academic Growth for Charter School students relative to performance of Virtual Twins in Traditional Public Schools in Tampa – ALL BLACK STUDENTS in POVERTY Average White, Non-Poverty TPS Growth
99
Student-Level Results
Average Academic Growth for Charter School students relative to performance of Virtual Twins in Traditional Public Schools in Tampa – ALL HISPANIC STUDENTS in POVERTY Average White Non-Poverty TPS Growth
100
Student-Level Results
Average Academic Growth for Charter School students relative to performance of Virtual Twins in Traditional Public Schools in Tampa – ALL ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS Average Non-ELL TPS Growth Average ELL TPS Growth
101
Student-Level Results
Average Academic Growth for Charter School students relative to performance of Virtual Twins in Traditional Public Schools in Tampa – ALL STUDENTS with SPECIAL EDUCATION NEEDS Average Non-SPED TPS Growth Average SPED TPS Growth
102
Student-Level Results
Average Academic Growth for Charter School students relative to performance of Virtual Twins in Traditional Public Schools in Tampa – ALL STUDENTS WHO WERE RETAINED IN PRIOR YEAR Average Non-Retained TPS Growth Average Retained TPS Growth
103
WEST PALM BEACH Results
104
Student-Level Results
Average Academic Growth for Charter School students relative to performance of Virtual Twins in Traditional Public Schools in West Palm Beach – ALL STUDENTS Average TPS Growth Average TPS Growth
105
Student-Level Results
Average Academic Growth for Charter School students relative to performance of Virtual Twins in Traditional Public Schools in West Palm Beach – ALL STUDENTS by Growth Period Average TPS Growth
106
Student-Level Results
Average Academic Growth for Charter School students relative to performance of Virtual Twins in Traditional Public Schools in West Palm Beach – ALL STUDENTS by Gradespan Average Elementary TPS Growth ‡ There were not enough West Palm Beach Middle School students in Reading or Math to compute an effect size.
107
Student-Level Results
Average Academic Growth for Charter School students relative to performance of Virtual Twins in Traditional Public Schools in West Palm Beach – ALL STUDENTS by Years of Charter School Enrollment Average TPS Growth This analysis includes only students who entered a charter school after
108
Student-Level Results
Average Academic Growth for Charter School students relative to performance of Virtual Twins in Traditional Public Schools in West Palm Beach – ALL WHITE STUDENTS Average White TPS Growth Average White TPS Growth
109
Student-Level Results
Average Academic Growth for Charter School students relative to performance of Virtual Twins in Traditional Public Schools in West Palm Beach – ALL ASIAN STUDENTS Average White TPS Growth Average Asian TPS Growth
110
Student-Level Results
Average Academic Growth for Charter School students relative to performance of Virtual Twins in Traditional Public Schools in West Palm Beach – ALL NATIVE AMERICAN STUDENTS Average White TPS Growth Average Native American TPS Growth ‡ There were not enough West Palm Beach Native American students in Reading or Math to compute an effect size.
111
Student-Level Results
Average Academic Growth for Charter School students relative to performance of Virtual Twins in Traditional Public Schools in West Palm Beach – ALL BLACK STUDENTS Average White TPS Growth Average Black TPS Growth
112
Student-Level Results
Average Academic Growth for Charter School students relative to performance of Virtual Twins in Traditional Public Schools in West Palm Beach – ALL HISPANIC STUDENTS Average White TPS Growth Average Hispanic TPS Growth
113
Student-Level Results
Average Academic Growth for Charter School students relative to performance of Virtual Twins in Traditional Public Schools in West Palm Beach – ALL STUDENTS ELIGIBLE FOR FREE / REDUCED PRICE LUNCH Average Non-Poverty TPS Growth Average TPS in Poverty Growth
114
Student-Level Results
Average Academic Growth for Charter School students relative to performance of Virtual Twins in Traditional Public Schools in West Palm Beach – ALL BLACK STUDENTS in POVERTY Average White, Non-Poverty TPS Growth
115
Student-Level Results
Average Academic Growth for Charter School students relative to performance of Virtual Twins in Traditional Public Schools in West Palm Beach – ALL HISPANIC STUDENTS in POVERTY Average White Non-Poverty TPS Growth
116
Student-Level Results
Average Academic Growth for Charter School students relative to performance of Virtual Twins in Traditional Public Schools in West Palm Beach – ALL ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS Average Non-ELL TPS Growth Average ELL TPS Growth
117
Student-Level Results
Average Academic Growth for Charter School students relative to performance of Virtual Twins in Traditional Public Schools in West Palm Beach – ALL STUDENTS with SPECIAL EDUCATION NEEDS Average Non-SPED TPS Growth Average SPED TPS Growth
118
Student-Level Results
Average Academic Growth for Charter School students relative to performance of Virtual Twins in Traditional Public Schools in West Palm Beach – ALL STUDENTS WHO WERE RETAINED IN PRIOR YEAR Average Non-Retained TPS Growth Average Retained TPS Growth
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.