Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Eugene S. Takle Iowa State University

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Eugene S. Takle Iowa State University"— Presentation transcript:

1 Eugene S. Takle Iowa State University gstakle@iastate.edu
Midwest Weather Working Group Indianapolis, IN 7 October 2009

2 Des Moines Airport Data
1983: 31 1988: 26 2009 so far: 1

3 Des Moines Airport Data
1983: 13 1988: 10 2009 so far: 0

4 Des Moines Airport Data
1983: 13 1988: 10 2009 so far: 0

5 6 days ≥ 100oF in the last 20 years
Des Moines Airport Data 1983: 13 1988: 10 6 days ≥ 100oF in the last 20 years 2009 so far: 0

6 Ames Data

7 Des Moines Airport Data

8 Des Moines Airport Data

9 State-Wide Average Data

10

11 State-Wide Average Data

12 Cedar Rapids Data

13 “One of the clearest trends in the United States observational record is an increasing frequency and intensity of heavy precipitation events… Over the last century there was a 50% increase in the frequency of days with precipitation over mm (four inches) in the upper midwestern U.S.; this trend is statistically significant “

14 Cedar Rapids Data

15 D. Herzmann, Iowa Environmental Mesonet

16 Source: IPCC 4th Assessment Report, 2007

17 December-January-February Temperature Change
4.0 3.5 A1B Emission Scenario minus Source: IPCC 4th Assessment Report, 2007

18 Source: IPCC 4th Assessment Report, 2007

19 June-July-August Temperature Change
2.5 A1B Emission Scenario minus 3.0 Source: IPCC 4th Assessment Report, 2007

20 Source: IPCC 4th Assessment Report, 2007

21 December-January-February Precipitation Change
0.1 0.0 A1B Emission Scenario minus Source: IPCC 4th Assessment Report, 2007

22 Source: IPCC 4th Assessment Report, 2007

23 June-July-August Precipitation Change
0.0 -0.1 A1B Emission Scenario minus Source: IPCC 4th Assessment Report, 2007

24 Change in Annual Cloud Cover
Source: IPCC 4th Assessment Report, 2007

25 Change in Annual Cloud Cover
-1.0 -1.5 A1B Emission Scenario minus Source: IPCC 4th Assessment Report, 2007

26 Change in Diurnal Temperature Range
Source: IPCC 4th Assessment Report, 2007

27 Change in Diurnal Temperature Range
-0.3 0.0 0.3 A1B Emission Scenario minus Source: IPCC 4th Assessment Report, 2007

28 Change in Evaporation Source: IPCC 4th Assessment Report, 2007

29 Change in Evaporation A1B Emission Scenario 2080-2099 minus 1980-1999
0.2 0.1 A1B Emission Scenario minus Source: IPCC 4th Assessment Report, 2007

30 Change in Soil Moisture
Source: IPCC 4th Assessment Report, 2007

31 Change in Soil Moisture
-5 A1B Emission Scenario minus Source: IPCC 4th Assessment Report, 2007

32 *Estimated from IPCC reports

33 *Estimated from IPCC reports

34 *Estimated from IPCC and CCSP reports

35

36 Waxman-Markey Bill Midwest activities relating to a “national climate service” Question for Midwest Weather Working Group

37 TITLE I—CLEAN ENERGY TITLE II—ENERGY EFFICIENCY TITLE III—REDUCING GLOBAL WARMING POLLUTION TITLE IV—TRANSITIONING TO A CLEAN ENERGY ECONOMY TITLE VII—GLOBAL WARMING POLLUTION REDUCTION PROGRAM TITLE VIII—ADDITIONAL GREENHOUSE GAS STANDARDS

38 TITLE IV—TRANSITIONING TO A CLEAN ENERGY ECONOMY
Subtitle E—Adapting to Climate Change PART 1—DOMESTIC ADAPTATION: Subpart A—National Climate Change Adaptation Program NATIONAL CLIMATE CHANGE VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENTS. CLIMATE CHANGE ADAPTATION SERVICES NATIONAL CLIMATE SERVICE

39 Corn and Climate Workshop (Ames, 2008)
Midwest regional office of the National Weather Service has been exploring climate needs assessment for the Midwest (Doug Kluck) Corn and Climate Workshop (Ames, 2008) Regional Climate Services Planning Meeting for Agriculture, September 9-10, 2009 – Champaign/Urbana, IL Pilot project (Steve Hilberg, Dev Niyogi, Gene Takle) on agriculture needs assessment Calendar for weather-driven agriculture decsions

40 Rather, “what do you do and when do you do it?”
Don’t ask “what climate information do you need and when do you need it?” Rather, “what do you do and when do you do it?” When (month) are decisions made? What is the lead time related to that decision? 2 hours (weather forecast) 2 days (weather forecast) 2 weeks (ensemble climate simulation) 2 months (ensemble climate simulation) 6 months (ensemble climate simulation) 2 years (ensemble climate simulation)

41 What decision tools that you currently use can be driven by hourly values of future meteorological or soil variables? When (month) are these decisions made? What lead time is needed for these weather conditions?


Download ppt "Eugene S. Takle Iowa State University"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google