Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
1
ERASMUS+ Capacity-building in Higher Education
2017 Selection – main results and tendencies Erasmus+
2
Summary of Results Received applications: 833 (compared to 736 in 2017, +13% increase) Recommended for funding: 149 (17,6% from 833 submitted proposals) Joint Projects: 134 (84%) Structural Projects: 15 (16%) National: 73 (49%) Multi-country: 76 (51%) of which 58 regional cross-regional Projects with a Partner Country coordinator: 34 (23%) Countries represented in the selected projects: 103 (out of 147) Partner Countries and 32 (out of 33) Programme Countries Average consortium size: 12 partners (min. 6 , max. 32) Average budget: € Erasmus+
3
Coverage of submitted applications by regions 2017 vs 2016
Erasmus+
4
Selection progress 2017 vs 2016
5
Selection Results – Type of projects
6
Selection Results – Priority areas covered
7
Counsellors DEMO.IL
8
PACES
9
Innovation AHEAD Education Research
10
media and creative industries
SMART RESEARCHERS STUDENTS MOBILE APPLICATIONS ENERGY ENTREPRENEURS media and creative industries SMEs ICT GIS ENVIRONMENT
11
E+ Capacity Building in Higher Education Selection 2017
Stage 1 Western Balkans 2 Eastern Partn 3 South Med 4 Russian Federa-tion 6 Asia 7 Central Asia 8 Latin America 9 Iran, Iraq, Yemen 10 South Africa 11 ACP Total* Reception 135 243 196 108 120 121 98 12 50 833 Eligible >60 points 102 167 151 68 76 84 80 36 609 Sent to Consultation 58 74 34 37 30 5 23 295 Proposed for funding 16 18 11 47 14 15 4 7 149 (compared to 2016) (18) (24) (36) (16) (53) (19) (14) (4) (5) (9) (147) Success rate % 11,8 7,4 18,8 39 11,5 15,3 33 17,6 Grant Agreement Consultation Evaluation Committee Award Decision Notification & Publication of results 20/05 – 20/06 14/07 24/07-27/07 4/08 – 7/08 15/10 – 31/12 * Figures cannot be added as cross-regional applications are counted in one or two regions Erasmus+
12
Lessons learned Done well: Take off of "new regions" (LA, Asia, ACP)
National vs Regional vs Cross-Regional Increased quality of applications Could have done better: Larger coverage of priorities, thematic areas More awareness on cross-cutting priorities Integration in HE of migrants & refugees from affected countries Wider diversity of partner / applicant organisations Projects' innovation potential Better involvement of students More active and transparent role of Ministries of Education (strengthening impact at national level) Erasmus+
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.