Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Nina Carlson Julie Fitzgerald Kevin Murphy Bethany Shore

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Nina Carlson Julie Fitzgerald Kevin Murphy Bethany Shore"— Presentation transcript:

1 Milwaukee’s Community Development Block Grant: Connecting Youth Services and Economic Development
Nina Carlson Julie Fitzgerald Kevin Murphy Bethany Shore Prepared for the City of Milwaukee, Budget and Management Division, Department of Administration

2 Introduction Framing the issue: Problems facing Milwaukee youth
CDGA allocates almost $2 million each year in federal CDBG funding to Youth Services

3 Purpose Research Tasks: Methods
Determine the effectiveness of Youth Services grants Explore the possibility of better linking Youth Services programming to economic development Methods

4 Table 1: Carnegie Youth Characteristics and Corresponding CDGA Program Categories
Carnegie Council Youth Characteristics Corresponding Program Category Intellectually reflective Education Healthy/Caring and ethical individual Crime prevention/personal development Good citizen Civic Engagement En route to meaningful work Economic Development Healthy Recreation

5 CDGA-sponsored youth programming by category
Program Category # of Programs Crime Prevention/Personal Development 20 Civic Engagement 8 Recreation 7 Education 4 Economic Development

6

7 Research Question 1 Overview
Are CDGA Youth Services grants effective? Literature review on the general effectiveness of youth programming Analysis of CDGA performance files

8 Do Youth Programs Benefit Young People and Their Community?
According to academic research, they do. Examples: Education  Boost GPAs and school attendance Rec & Crime Prevention  Lower anti-social behaviors Civic Engagement  Improve concern for others’ welfare; improve work ethic The Benefits Last

9 CDGA’s Reporting & Monitoring System
The beginnings of a successful performance measurement system Outcome identification Outcome tracking

10 Best Practices in Performance Measurement: How do grantees perform?
Outcome measurement Struggle to distinguish between outputs and outcomes Data sources Some fail to use an adequate data source to measure outcomes Signs of success

11 Reporting and Monitoring Systems Recommendations
Mandatory Grantee Training Session Strengthen Grantee Reporting Requirements Implement a More Interactive Monitoring System

12 Research Question 2 Overview
How can Milwaukee link Youth Services programming to economic development? HUD definition of economic development Creating and maintaining jobs

13 Evaluation of Programming for Youth
Type of Programming Outcomes Early Intervention -Higher rates of return -Improves capacity for future learning School Age -Increases attendance and graduation rates -Lowers incidence of risky behavior Preparation for Post-Secondary Education -Develops personal qualities necessary for post-secondary success Economic and Workforce Development -Develops soft and job-specific skills -Positive short-term effects -Limited long-term employment and wage effects

14 Policy Options Focus on Job Training Focus on Post-Secondary Education
Status Quo

15 Research Question 2 Recommendations
Take a broader perspective on economic development Expanded definition of economic development Services that encourage post-secondary opportunities for youth, teach marketable job skills, provide workforce or higher education training for young adults, or encourage productive citizenship Maintain current mix of programming

16 Conclusion


Download ppt "Nina Carlson Julie Fitzgerald Kevin Murphy Bethany Shore"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google