Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

GridPP13 Collaboration Meeting

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "GridPP13 Collaboration Meeting"— Presentation transcript:

1 GridPP13 Collaboration Meeting
GridPP Overview Tony Doyle 4 July 2005 GridPP13 Collaboration Meeting

2 GridPP13 Collaboration Meeting
Contents Technical Design Reports Timescales Oversight Committee Summary Current concerns Actions (and how these were addressed) Feedback from the July 1 (OC7) meeting “Get Fit” Plan and Problem Solving Beyond GridPP2.. 4 July 2005 GridPP13 Collaboration Meeting

3 June Reports Computing Technical Design Reports: preprints/lhcc/public/ ALICE: lhcc pdf ATLAS: lhcc pdf CMS: lhcc pdf LHCb: lhcc pdf LCG: lhcc pdf LCG Baseline Services Group Report: Contains all you (probably) need to know about LHC computing 4 July 2005 GridPP13 Collaboration Meeting

4 GridPP13 Collaboration Meeting
Timescales Service Challenges – UK deployment plans 4 July 2005 GridPP13 Collaboration Meeting

5 Functionality Requirement OMII VDT/GT LCG/gLite Other Comment Storage Element Yes SRM via dCache, DPM or CASTOR LCG includes Storage Resource Management capability Basic File Transfer GridFTP LCG includes GridFTP Reliable File Transfer File Transfer Service FTS is built on top of GridFTP Catalogue Services RLS LCG File Catalogue, gLite FireMan Central catalogues adequate, high throughput needed Data Management tools OMII Data Service (upload / download ) LCG tools (replica management, etc.) gLite File Placement Service under development Compute Element OMII Job Service Gatekeeper LCG uses Globus with mods Workload Management Manual resource allocation & job submission Condor-G Resource Broker RB builds on Globus, Condor-G VO Agents Perform localised activities on behalf of VO VO Membership Services Tools for account management, no GridMapFile equivalent CAS VOMS CAS does not provide all the needed functionality DataBase Services MySQL, PostgreSQL, ORACLE Off–the-shelf offerings are adequate Posix-like I/O GFAL, gLite I/O Xrootd Application Software Installation Tools Tools already exist in LCG-2 e.g. PACMAN Job Monitoring Monalisa, Netlogger Logging & Bookkeeping service, R-GMA Reliable Messaging Tools such as Jabber are used by experiments (e.g. DIRAC for LHCb) Information System MDS (GLUE) BDII LCG based on BDII and GLUE schema Fits on a page. Concentrate on robustness and scale. Experiments have assigned priorities. 4 July 2005 GridPP13 Collaboration Meeting

6 July Documents Addressed various concerns of the OC
PPARC Oversight Committee Papers Seventh GridPP Oversight Committee (July 2005) Executive Summary Project Map Link to Project Map Database (Excel) Version (v2) Resource Report LCG Report EGEE Report Deployment Report Middleware/Security/Network Report Applications Report User Board Report Tier-1/A Report Tier-2 Report Dissemination Report UK Analysis Metrics and Deployment Middleware Planning Experiment engagement questionnaire See Addressed various concerns of the OC 4 July 2005 GridPP13 Collaboration Meeting

7 GridPP13 Collaboration Meeting
Exec2 Summary GridPP2 has already met 21% of its original targets with 86% of the metrics within specification “Get fit” plan described (requested by OC) gLite 1 was released in April as planned but components have not yet been deployed or their robustness tested by the experiments Service Challenge (SC) 2 addressing networking was a success at CERN and the Tier-1 SC3 addressing file transfers for the experiments is about to commence Long-term concern: hardware at the Tier-1 in Short-term concerns: under-utilisation of resources and the deployment of Tier-2 resources 4 July 2005 GridPP13 Collaboration Meeting

8 RAL joins labs worldwide in successful Service Challenge 2
The GridPP team at Rutherford Appleton Laboratory (RAL) in Oxfordshire recently joined computing centres around the world in a networking challenge that saw RAL transfer 60 terabytes of data over a ten-day period. A home user with a 512 kilobit per second broadband connection would be waiting 30 years to complete a download of the same size. 4 July 2005 GridPP13 Collaboration Meeting

9 GridPP13 Collaboration Meeting
gLite 1 4 July 2005 GridPP13 Collaboration Meeting

10 100 green sites sitting on a grid
Thu 16 Jun 2005 Last week the UK CIC-on-duty team celebrated the milestone of having 100 sites passing the Sites Functional Test. Thanks to all the sites who acted promptly to trouble tickets raised by the UK team during their shift. 4 July 2005 GridPP13 Collaboration Meeting

11 Current concern 1. under-utilisation
Under -utilisation of existing Tier-1/A resources improving overall and w.r.t. Grid fraction from 2004 to 2005 Non-Grid Grid 4 July 2005 GridPP13 Collaboration Meeting

12 Current concern 2. under-delivery
The current situation is somewhat better than these 2005 Q1 numbers indicate Some late procurements (OK given under-utilisation) Technical problems (being overcome) 4 July 2005 GridPP13 Collaboration Meeting

13 Longer-Term concern: allocations
2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 Alloc. Disk CPU Tape TB KSI2k kSI2k ALICE 5 14 4 1 10 24 13 26 48 46 84 80 147 ATLAS 27 400 68 257 529 150 508 801 377 887 1571 1033 1249 2593 2026 1892 3504 2790 CMS 40 86 50 200 206 74 205 128 283 483 227 449 670 343 661 1148 503 916 1663 LHCb 15 90 25 30 108 222 104 191 384 207 644 346 450 868 714 545 1290 1178 TOTAL 191 796 239 298 1282 331 604 1604 891 1100 2167 1280 1945 3891 2316 2633 5516 4130 3641 7358 5944 LHC TOTAL 87 590 69 174 651 250 450 980 664 841 1492 1080 1484 2712 2074 2087 4206 3934 3020 5857 5710 LHC Fraction 46% 74% 29% 58% 51% 76% 61% 69% 84% 70% 90% 79% 95% 83% 80% 96% Starting point: fair shares input to BaBar and LHC MoUs 4 July 2005 GridPP13 Collaboration Meeting

14 Metrics and Deployment
GridPP is a significant contributor to EGEE (20%) CPU utilisation is low Disk utilisation is climbing (but very low) 4 July 2005 GridPP13 Collaboration Meeting

15 Metrics and Deployment
Sites upgrade improvements – quarterly upgrades within 3 weeks gradual improvement in site configuration and stability Reflects systematic approach and measurable improvements in deployment 4 July 2005 GridPP13 Collaboration Meeting

16 GridPP Deployment Status 2/7/05 (9/1/05)
Measurable Improvements totalCPU freeCPU runJob waitJob seAvail TB seUsed TB maxCPU avgCPU Total 2966 (2029) 1666 (1402) 843 (95) 31 (480) 74.28 (8.69) 16.54 (4.55) 3145 (2549) 2802 (1994) 4 July 2005 GridPP13 Collaboration Meeting

17 GridPP13 Collaboration Meeting
Actions GridPP to submit the proposal for LCG phase 2 funding to the Committee prior to its submission to Science Committee (minute 4.9). Done. 27 page report inc. input from OC at unfunded GridPP to clarify the situation with regard to ATLAS production run tests for the next physics workshop (minute 5.3). See News Item (and slide) GridPP to provide an update on progress resolving problems caused by mismatches between local batch systems and the capabilities of the grid Resource broker (minute 6.3). (See slide) GridPP to more fully document its alignment with each of the individual experiments (minute 15.2). An experiment engagement questionnaire has been used (initial input in February and further [updated] input in June). See 4 July 2005 GridPP13 Collaboration Meeting

18 ATLAS steps up Grid production
4 July 2005 GridPP13 Collaboration Meeting

19 GridPP13 Collaboration Meeting
RB Action GridPP to provide an update on progress resolving problems caused by mismatches between local batch systems and the capabilities of the grid Resource broker (minute 6.3). The problem of connecting the local CE to a batch queue is largely overcome – many (all shared) sites now do this. There were problems subsequently deploying the accounting system (APEL) to point to the local batch system. Overcome (13 ex 18 sites), but not as straightforward as it could be. The JDL from the job is not passed to the local system. Hence there is no way for the local scheduler to use info from the Grid scheduler. This is a limitation from a (shared) site viewpoint (attempting to balance Grid and local jobs). The short term solution is to set up separate batch queues. It is not a limitation for the experiments (affects efficiency). It is noted as a requirement and it is intended that this will be delivered in Year 2 of JRA1 for the WMS. 4 July 2005 GridPP13 Collaboration Meeting

20 GridPP13 Collaboration Meeting
Actions GridPP to define its usage policy with respect to Tier-1 allocations (minute 15.4). See and documents within (“fair shares” using PPARC Form X information) GridPP to produce an updated risk register (minute 15.5). Incorporated in the new Project Map at (with 7 “high” risks) GridPP to produce a “get-fit” plan for production metrics (minute 15.6). See Metrics and Deployment document and its incorporation into the Project Map GridPP to define its metrics for job success (minute 15.7). Adopted EGEE-wide definition at (See slides) GridPP to produce a statement of intent regarding its adoption of gLite (minute 15.8). See Middleware Selection document 4 July 2005 GridPP13 Collaboration Meeting

21 GridPP13 Collaboration Meeting
Metrics Action GridPP to define its metrics for job success (minute 15.7). GridPP adopts the EGEE-wide definition at The (web-based) QA system accounts for Workload Management System registered job successes (that can then be categorised by Virtual Organisation or Resource Broker) Before introducing the figures it should be understood that there are caveats: It only measures what the WMS “sees” doesn't catch failure of WMS to register job in the first place (but this is a rare occurrence) if a job half way through the script fails (for example tries but fails to copy a file) but the script completes successfully then WMS sees everything as OK. If a VO (e.g. LHCb) deploys an agent then the WMS only registers the success of the initial (python) script: strategy enables higher overall LHCb performance (combined push-PULL model). (This currently leads to other problems in overall accounting should contention become an issue). Overall: an end user may see either: 1. a worse efficiency failed job for other hidden e.g. data management problems 2. a better efficiency by choosing selected sites according to the Site Functional Test performance index; deploying an agent to initiate real jobs at sites where the agent succeeded. Physicists are “smart” and now “see” > 90% efficiency but the definition here is one defined within a given VO adopting their own methods (and from informed input from people currently submitting jobs to the system). 4 July 2005 GridPP13 Collaboration Meeting

22 GridPP13 Collaboration Meeting
Overview Integrated over all VOs and RBs for first half of 2005 Successes/Day Success % % Key point: Improving from 42% to 78% during 2005 [For the UK RB (lcgrb01.gridpp.rl.ac.uk) Successes/Day Success % % ] 4 July 2005 GridPP13 Collaboration Meeting

23 GridPP13 Collaboration Meeting
LHC VOs ALICE ATLAS CMS LHCb Successes/Day N/A Success % 42% % % % 4 July 2005 GridPP13 Collaboration Meeting

24 GridPP13 Collaboration Meeting
Other VOs BaBar CDF D0 BioMed Successes/Day Success % 76% % % 76% PMB request: please enable the BioMed VO at your site 4 July 2005 GridPP13 Collaboration Meeting

25 GridPP13 Collaboration Meeting
Interlude.. Angels & Demons introduces the character of Robert Langdon, professor of religious iconology and art history at Harvard University. As the novel begins, he's awakened in the middle of the night by a phone call from Maximilian Kohler, the director of CERN, the world's largest scientific research facility in Geneva, Switzerland. One of their top physicists, Lenoardo Vetra, had been murdered, with his chest branded with the word "Illuminati.” Lenoardo Vetra created antimatter in canisters to simulate the Big Bang. Vetra's murder, though, allows one of the canisters to be stolen. Langdon and Vittoria Petra are quickly sent off to Rome and Vatican City, to help find the canister and return it to CERN before it explodes at midnight... 4 July 2005 GridPP13 Collaboration Meeting

26 GridPP13 Collaboration Meeting
Agents and Daemons 4 July 2005 GridPP13 Collaboration Meeting

27 The future for the experiments?
4 July 2005 GridPP13 Collaboration Meeting

28 OC Preliminary Feedback
ALL earlier actions were considered as “done” from OC perspective GridPP to investigate alternative procurement strategies in order to improve Tier-1/A utilisation Actions: Tier-1/A Board I evaluate alternative approaches User Board – THIS MEETING improve experiment estimates GridPP to associate more resources for technical documentation (for end users and system administrators) Internal advertising: is anyone within GridPP willing/able to take up the role of “Documentation Officer”? (There will be an incentive for this) If this fails, to advertise the post using role description (being drafted) Deployment Board – THIS MEETING 4 July 2005 GridPP13 Collaboration Meeting

29 OC Preliminary Feedback
GridPP to develop a deployment model that works for smaller T2 centres in association with CERN GridPP to provide a gap analysis for LCG (using the baseline services and the [classified] experiment components as described in the TDRs) GridPP to address UB questionnaire outcomes (perceptions as well as actual shortcomings) GridPP to document the high-level "value" GridPP is adding/delivering (using Project Map) OC8 in February 2006 “important” (not “G8 on Wednesday”) 4 July 2005 GridPP13 Collaboration Meeting

30 GridPP13 Collaboration Meeting
The “Get Fit” Plan Set SMART (Specific Measurable Achievable Realistic Time-phased) Goals 4 July 2005 GridPP13 Collaboration Meeting

31 GridPP13 Collaboration Meeting
“I take it plea bargaining is out of the question?” See Dave’s talk 4 July 2005 GridPP13 Collaboration Meeting

32 GridPP13 Collaboration Meeting
Our 14 problems… 0.104: Number of LCG/EGEE job slots published by the UK. The current total is 2477 and the target was 3000. 0.105: Number of LCG/EGEE jobs slots used. The current fraction is 19% compared to a target of 70%. This demonstrates that above is clearly not an issue but that usage is presently low. 0.106: GridPP KSI2K available: By the end of March 2005 the combined Tier-1 and Tier-2 CPU power was expected to be 5184 KSI2K compared to 2277 KSI2K achieved. This number is dominated by the 4397 KSI2K expected from the Tier-2s which has been slowly becoming available. 0.108: GridPP disk storage available: Similar to above. Only 280TB available compared to 968TB anticipated but the situation is improving. 0.111: GridPP tape storage made available to LCG/EGEE. At present the tape storage is being used but not really via the Grid route. 0.112: Fraction of available KSI2K used in quarter: at present a rough estimate shows about 42% of the available CPU was used compared to a target value of 70%. 0.113: Fraction of available disk used in quarter: This is estimated at 64% compared to the target of 70%. 0.114: Fraction of available Tape used in quarter: This is estimated at 61% compared to the target of 70%. 0.131: Tier-1 service disaster recovery plans up to date: This has not been updated within the last 6 months. 0.143: Accumulated scheduled downtime in the last quarter: The current value of 418 days is almost identical to the current) target of 411 days. The metric expects the 25% figure to reduce to 5% by the third year. 3.6.3: LCG Deployment evaluation reports: first report due in March 05 was delayed to the second quarter. Tier-2 Hardware realisation: This flags the same issue as and above. Tier-2 hardware has been delayed but the situation is improving. 5.2.7 Quarterly reports received within 1 month of the end of the quarter: The 05Q1 reports were received late. Some of the delay was due to the unfortunate timing of EGEE meetings. 6.2.11: Non-HEP applications tested on the GridPP Grid (submitted via the NGS submission mechanism). The NGS submission mechanism is not yet adequate. 4 July 2005 GridPP13 Collaboration Meeting

33 GridPP13 Collaboration Meeting
The “Get Fit” Plan … not (yet) “The Final Solution” We hope this drives the right behaviour Plea bargaining is (probably) OK.. 4 July 2005 GridPP13 Collaboration Meeting

34 Some Problem Solving Strategies
4 July 2005 GridPP13 Collaboration Meeting

35 LHC EXPLOITATION PLANNING REVIEW
Beyond GridPP2.. LHC EXPLOITATION PLANNING REVIEW Input is requested from the UK project spokespersons, for ATLAS and CMS for each of the financial years 2008/9 to 2011/12, and for LHCb, ALICE and GridPP for 2007/8 to 2011/12. Physics programme Please give a brief outline of the planned physics programme. Please also indicate how this planned programme could be enhanced with additional resources. In total this should be no more than 3 sides of A4. The aim is to understand the incremental physics return from increasing resources. Input will be based upon PPAP roadmap input E-Science and LCG-2 (26 Oct 2004) and feedback from CB (12 Jan & 7 July 2005) 4 July 2005 GridPP13 Collaboration Meeting

36 Problem Solving and Improved Communication
“Communication, in essence, is the shift of a particle from one part of space to another part of space. A particle is the thing being communicated. It can be an object, a written message, a spoken word or an idea. In its crudest definition, this is communication. This simple view of communication leads to the full definition: Communication is the consideration and action of impelling an impulse or particle from source-point across a distance to receipt-point, with the intention of bringing into being at the receipt-point a duplication and understanding of that which emanated from the source-point..” from The Scientology Handbook This may be a clue to how we will overcome our problems But we can always improve this.. 4 July 2005 GridPP13 Collaboration Meeting

37 GridPP13 Collaboration Meeting
Summary LHC Technical Design Reports define an endpoint Responsive-mode deployment/development Timescales for LHC are soon – first cosmics data taken Oversight Committee – improve “efficiency” Some particular issues: Tier-1/A utilisation Documentation Officer “Get Fit” plan endorsed by OC requires support from everyone to improve metrics There are 14 deployment problems (some interdependency) that need to be solved Many areas are now quantifiable (significant progress here) Service Challenges will help focus attention Improved communication and documentation (become a scientologist?!) Aim: measured end-to-end performance improvements during 2005 Beyond GridPP2: input required over the summer to PPARC LHC exploitation planning review 4 July 2005 GridPP13 Collaboration Meeting


Download ppt "GridPP13 Collaboration Meeting"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google