Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
1
802.24 Vertical Applications TAG
Sept 2018 Meeting Waikoloa, Hawaii, USA Tim Godfrey, EPRI
2
doc.: IEEE 802.15-<doc#>
<month year> doc.: IEEE <doc#> Overview Officers TAG Chair: Tim Godfrey Secretary & TAG Vice Chair: Ben Rolfe Task Groups Smart Grid TG Tim Godfrey IoT TG Chris DiMinico 28 Voting Members Agenda: Meetings for the Week Tuesday PM Kona 3 Wednesday PM Kona 3 Manual attendance tracking for & members <author>, <company>
3
Agenda – 802.24-18-0019r1 802.24 Agenda - September 2018, Waikoloa, HI
1 Tuesday PM2 session KONA 3 1.1 Call session to order, present “Guidelines for IEEE SA meetings”, Quorum Godfrey 5 4:00 PM 1.2 Review of Agenda / Approval of Agenda 4:05 PM 1.3 Approve minutes from prior TAG meeting 4:10 PM 1.4 Introduction/meeting objectives / Review action items from previous meeting 4:15 PM 1.5 Liaison Updates 10 4:20 PM 1.6 Smart Grid Task Group 4:30 PM 1.7 ITU and regulatory items Godfrey/Holcomb 15 1.8 1.9 Discuss incoming comments from IEEE PES PSCC S6 Task Force regarding contribution to "Standards for integrating Home Automation IoT to Power Utilities Communication System" 30 4:45 PM 1.10 802.11ah and g (Sub 1-GHz coexistence (follow up from SG) Godfrey/Rolfe 5:15 PM 1.11 Recess 5:45 PM 2 Wednesday PM2 session KONA 3 2.1 Call to Order Task Group 2.2 contributions to Nendica Godfrey/Marks 20 2.3 Review editor comments and finalize Sub 1-GHz white paper for publication 2.4 Development and Editing of TSN White Paper 4:40 PM 2.5 2019 Planning 5:00 PM 2.6 Closing / Action Items / Adjourn 5:20 PM Tim Godfrey, EPRI
4
Guidelines for IEEE-SA Meetings
All IEEE-SA standards meetings shall be conducted in compliance with all applicable laws, including antitrust and competition laws. Don’t discuss the interpretation, validity, or essentiality of patents/patent claims. Don’t discuss specific license rates, terms, or conditions. Relative costs, including licensing costs of essential patent claims, of different technical approaches may be discussed in standards development meetings. Technical considerations remain primary focus Don’t discuss or engage in the fixing of product prices, allocation of customers, or division of sales markets. Don’t discuss the status or substance of ongoing or threatened litigation. Don’t be silent if inappropriate topics are discussed… do formally object. If you have questions, contact the IEEE-SA Standards Board Patent Committee Administrator at or visit See IEEE-SA Standards Board Operations Manual, clause and “Promoting Competition and Innovation: What You Need to Know about the IEEE Standards Association's Antitrust and Competition Policy” for more details. This slide set is available at IEEE 802 Executive Committee
5
Participation in IEEE 802 Meetings
November 2016 doc.: ec EC Participation in IEEE 802 Meetings Participation in any IEEE 802 meeting (Sponsor, Sponsor subgroup, Working Group, Working Group subgroup, etc.) is on an individual basis • Participants in the IEEE standards development individual process shall act based on their qualifications and experience. ( section 5.2.1) • IEEE 802 Working Group membership is by individual; “Working Group members shall participate in the consensus process in a manner consistent with their professional expert opinion as individuals, and not as organizational representatives”. (subclause “Establishment”, of the IEEE 802 LMSC Working Group Policies and Procedures) • Participants have an obligation to act and vote as an individual and not under the direction of any other individual or group. A Participant’s obligation to act and vote as an individual applies in all cases, regardless of any external commitments, agreements, contracts, or orders. • Participants shall not direct the actions or votes of any other member of an IEEE 802 Working Group or retaliate against any other member for their actions or votes within IEEE 802 Working Group meetings, see section and the IEEE 802 LMSC Working Group Policies and Procedures, subclause “Chair”, list item x. By participating in IEEE 802 meetings, you accept these requirements. If you do not agree to these policies then you shall not participate. (Latest revision of IEEE 802 LMSC Working Group Policies and Procedures: ) Slide 5 IEEE 802 Executive Committee Page 5 Dorothy Stanley, HP Enterprise
6
Administration Attendance take on IMAT Web page Mailing list
Reciprocal rights for most WGs Web page Mailing list (voters list) Document archive IEEE 802 announcement reflector, Send to with no subject and with the following 2 lines appearing first in the body of the message Subscribe stds-802-all end Tim Godfrey, EPRI
7
802.24 TAG Approve July minutes TAG Action Items from July: Discussion
Farrokh Khatibi will provide introduction to ATIS group for liaison on classifying IoT services, and their characteristics, and communication link requirements: Response: “The completion of the first phase of the ATIS project is delayed to the end of the month, at which point it will be liaised to external organizations including ” Establish Liaison with IEC SC25 for single pair ethernet. Chris will base on IEC SEG 8 request Call for Comments on TSN and SPE white papers Request Ludwig Winkel to provide P2413 Update in September (not attending) Starting Sponsor Ballot. (request SB draft to be put in private area for comments) Request IoT Use Cases from Wi-Fi Alliance IoT MSTG Can we access the document in private area. (get permission from somebody at WFA) Discussion RTA TIG is pursuing low latency – possible alignment across various application categories. Invite more vertical application participants to attend in November. Tim Godfrey, EPRI
8
Liaison with IEC SEG8 Scope of SEG8: Liaison Request sent to SEG8
Assess, provide an overview and prioritization of the evolution of technical development and standardization in the field of communication technologies and architectures Liaison Request sent to SEG8 Next SEG 8 meeting Sept 25-26 Get permission to share draft in private area Provide notice on reflector of availability of draft for review before November meeting. In November, will review and propose additional text and sections to address identified gaps. Tim Godfrey, EPRI
9
Informal Liaison with Wi-Fi Alliance
Process is to request use cases for topics of interest. Ian Sherlock will send an example request. Tim Godfrey, EPRI
10
Tuesday Smart Grid TG Tim Godfrey, EPRI
11
ITU and Radio Regulatory Items
Update from Database proposal in response to 6 GHz NPRM Intended to address objections of incumbent users of band (including utilities) Does database access reduce resilience of the network? If the backbone is down, how do devices get access? 15.4m provides a mechanism for initial transmission connection to query. Is there a need for a white paper on the implications of database access for critical applications? Both the incumbent users need confidence of protection, but the database users also need confidence of availability of access. Coordinate with Rich Kennedy’s work Tim Godfrey, EPRI
12
CEN-CENELEC-ETSI Smart Grid Coordination Group
Possible new activity in this group No – nothing new happening Tim Godfrey, EPRI
13
IEEE PSCC TF S6 January 2018 Study Report – "Standards for integrating Home Automation IoT to Power Utilities Communication Systems“ TF S6 provided a new draft for review (in private area) Comments / discussion 5.7 performance requirements – what are other requirements that should be included? Is it performance of the network, the application, both/neither? Reliability, Availability, Cost (OpEx, CapEx), Energy Consumption? Lifecycle? Size? Environmental? Figure 8 g SUN PHY is missing. NB-IOT is missing from 2G/3G/LTE column. Security is not shown at all? Z-wave is not a standard except for PHY? In the class of PLC, there are G3, PRIME, IEEE (Netricity) Figure 9 Why is HEMS not connected to anything? Our comments incorporated into draft and uploaded to private area. Continue discussion in November. Tim Godfrey, EPRI
14
g and ah Coexistence will develop a whitepaper/document for application-specific use cases. Identifying where each standard is most suitable, and how to make best use of other changes. Identify use cases where g is not sufficient and both are needed Could be choices of applications, channel guidelines, duty cycle, Avoid perception that 802 standards are unable to coexist Evaluate and describe potential application-level implications of delay/latency increases due to mutual interference As the work towards a recommended practice begins, a white paper can be used to explain the mutual benefits. A revision to first Sub 1-GHz white paper or a new one? If NS-3 simulation models can be shared, others in IEEE 802 could progress that work. MERL will share simulation models on Github. New modules for 11ah 15.4g Tim Godfrey, EPRI
15
Wednesday 802.24.1 Smart Grid TG
Tim Godfrey, EPRI
16
Nendica IEEE 802 network enhancements for the next decade Industry Connections Activity Initiation Document (ICAID) NENDICA develops reports on specific topics. Completed data centers. Next Topics Distributed Radio Access Networks Second work item: Flexible Factory IoT – apply TSN activities: can provide review and feedback on Flexible Factory IoT and Distributed Radio Access Networks Identify vertical applications that could be enabled by TSN features Identify vertical application that could be enabled if TSN features were present in wireless standards Can interfaces between wired and wireless map application-specific streams? Provide vertical application requirements (needs, underlying problems) to Nendica. Describing what is needed to define a common framework for TSN across wired and wireless standards. How do they fit together. An initial exploration of the concept of TSN applied to wireless (specifically ) and how it could relate to mechanisms. While has a big set of standards, there is one for – 802.3br. Perhaps a similar structure for an amendment. If RTA becomes an amendment what would it apply to? (Dave C’s presentation looked into this question) There is a broad set of vertical applications that could benefit from an extension of TSN into Actions for for November – check with Roger to see if further comments are desired on FFIoT – if so announce on reflector. Tim Godfrey, EPRI
17
Sub 1 GHz White Paper Review “802.24 TAG white paper_clean_TS.docx”
Comments/Questions from IEEE editor received following July Meeting Final review then publish Comments were discussed and resolved by the group. Edits to be returned to IEEE Editors. Tim Godfrey, EPRI
18
TSN White Paper Updated document r15 uploaded to Mentor following July meeting. TAG completed review Accept revisions, clean up comments, and post with new doc number sgtg. Start Comment Collection on reflector for November. Call For Comments on Reflector Plan to finish in November Tim Godfrey, EPRI
19
2019 Planning A whitepaper/document for application-specific use cases of Sub 1GHz standards g and ah. Identifying where each standard is most suitable, and how to make best use of mechanisms proposed in TG. Can this also include applying s in sub-1GHz spectrum? white paper on IoT and P2413 P2413 entering Sponsor Ballot Update of first Smart Grid white paper to address latest amendments of w, x, y Nendica – TBD provide contributions to Nendica reports or separate white paper? Tim Godfrey, EPRI
20
802.24 TAG closing Action Items from this meeting Any New Business?
Get SEPA wireless matrix latest version, plan to address comments from David Cypher in November Return PSCC TF S6 with our comments Start comment collection on TSN white paper Any New Business? Tim Godfrey, EPRI
Similar presentations
© 2024 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.