1. Joint Proposal Opening Report
January 2006
doc.: IEEE /0045r0
January 2006
Joint Proposal Opening Report
Date:
Authors:
Notice: This document has been prepared to assist IEEE It is offered as a basis for discussion and is not binding on the contributing individual(s) or organization(s). The material in this document is subject to change in form and content after further study. The contributor(s) reserve(s) the right to add, amend or withdraw material contained herein.
Release: The contributor grants a free, irrevocable license to the IEEE to incorporate material contained in this contribution, and any modifications thereof, in the creation of an IEEE Standards publication; to copyright in the IEEE’s name any IEEE Standards publication even though it may include portions of this contribution; and at the IEEE’s sole discretion to permit others to reproduce in whole or in part the resulting IEEE Standards publication. The contributor also acknowledges and accepts that this contribution may be made public by IEEE
Patent Policy and Procedures: The contributor is familiar with the IEEE 802 Patent Policy and Procedures < ieee802.org/guides/bylaws/sb-bylaws.pdf>, including the statement "IEEE standards may include the known use of patent(s), including patent applications, provided the IEEE receives assurance from the patent holder or applicant with respect to patents essential for compliance with both mandatory and optional portions of the standard." Early disclosure to the Working Group of patent information that might be relevant to the standard is essential to reduce the possibility for delays in the development process and increase the likelihood that the draft publication will be approved for publication. Please notify the Chair as early as possible, in written or electronic form, if patented technology (or technology under patent application) might be incorporated into a draft standard being developed within the IEEE Working Group. If you have questions, contact the IEEE Patent Committee Administrator at
Mujtaba (Agere), Petranovich (Conexant), Fischer (Broadcom), Stephens (Intel) et. al.
Mujtaba (Agere), Petranovich (Conexant), Fischer (Broadcom), Stephens (Intel), Rosdahl (Samsung) et. al.

2. January 2006
Mujtaba (Agere), Petranovich (Conexant), Fischer (Broadcom), Stephens (Intel) et. al.

3. January 2006
Mujtaba (Agere), Petranovich (Conexant), Fischer (Broadcom), Stephens (Intel) et. al.

4. January 2006
Mujtaba (Agere), Petranovich (Conexant), Fischer (Broadcom), Stephens (Intel) et. al.

5. January 2006
Mujtaba (Agere), Petranovich (Conexant), Fischer (Broadcom), Stephens (Intel) et. al.

6. January 2006
Mujtaba (Agere), Petranovich (Conexant), Fischer (Broadcom), Stephens (Intel) et. al.

7. January 2006
Mujtaba (Agere), Petranovich (Conexant), Fischer (Broadcom), Stephens (Intel) et. al.

8. January 2006
Mujtaba (Agere), Petranovich (Conexant), Fischer (Broadcom), Stephens (Intel) et. al.

9. January 2006
Abstract
This document provides an update on the joint proposal effort among TGn Sync, WWiSE, and MitMot at Waikoloa, Hawaii (Jan. 2006) meetings.
Mujtaba (Agere), Petranovich (Conexant), Fischer (Broadcom), Stephens (Intel) et. al.

10. Proposal Status January 2006
Mujtaba (Agere), Petranovich (Conexant), Fischer (Broadcom), Stephens (Intel) et. al.

11. January 2006
IT’S READY!!!!!!
Mujtaba (Agere), Petranovich (Conexant), Fischer (Broadcom), Stephens (Intel) et. al.

12. The Joint Proposal has been Submitted
January 2006
The Joint Proposal has been Submitted
The Joint Proposal team has completed its work and has generated a complete proposal which meets all TGn requirements
The proposal has been posted
/1102r4 JP PHY Technical Spec.
/1095r4 JP MAC Technical Spec.
The supporting documents:
/0046r0 JP FRCC Compliance
/0067r0 TGn JP PHY Results
/1266r1 TGn JP MAC Results
/1267r1 TGn JP MAC Simulation Methodology
/ TGn JP MAC results (detailed)
Mujtaba (Agere), Petranovich (Conexant), Fischer (Broadcom), Stephens (Intel) et. al.

13. JP Proposal Broad industry effort:
January 2006
JP Proposal
Broad industry effort:
JP = TGn Sync + WWiSE (MitMot)
42 companies (>300 engineers)
Regular weekly meeting since formation (June ’05)
Consensus was reached though an IEEE like contribution based process
Confirming this proposal is the best way forward toward completing the work of TGn
Mature proposal
FRCC Compliant
Performance Simulations from multiple companies
Mujtaba (Agere), Petranovich (Conexant), Fischer (Broadcom), Stephens (Intel) et. al.

14. January 2006
Reaching JP Consensus
Numerous contributions and rigorous review have created a complete JP proposal
JP Team has approved the Joint Proposal by overwhelming consensus, (No Objections)
The individual consortia also overwhelmingly support the Joint Proposal
TGnSync – No Objections
WWiSE (MitMot) – No Objections
Mujtaba (Agere), Petranovich (Conexant), Fischer (Broadcom), Stephens (Intel) et. al.

15. January 2006
PHY Architecture
items in red are changes to architecture since Nov 2005 submission
Mujtaba (Agere), Petranovich (Conexant), Fischer (Broadcom), Stephens (Intel) et. al.

16. Recap of Architecture Encoder Puncturer Parser Interleaver QAM Mapper
January 2006
Recap of Architecture
Encoder
Puncturer
Parser
Interleaver
QAM
Mapper
Antenna
Mapper
iFFT
Window
& GI RF
Pilot
Preamble
Agreed upon
Under discussion
Mujtaba (Agere), Petranovich (Conexant), Fischer (Broadcom), Stephens (Intel) et. al.

17. Scalable PHY Architecture
January 2006
Scalable PHY Architecture
Mandatory
Optional
Robustness Enhancement
Open Loop SDM
Closed Loop Tx BF
STBC
Robustness Enhancement
Conv. Coding
LDPC
Throughput
Enhancement
1or 2 Spatial Streams
4 Spatial Streams
Throughput
Enhancement
20 MHz
40 MHz
150 Mbps
 600 Mbps
Mujtaba (Agere), Petranovich (Conexant), Fischer (Broadcom), Stephens (Intel) et. al.

18. JP PHY Key Parameters January 2006 Parameter JP PHY Spatial Streams
1 to 4
FEC (BCC)
R=1/2, K=7
Generator polynomial (1338, 1718)
Puncturer: 2/3, 3/4, and 5/6
Number of Encoders: 1 below 300Mbps, 2 above
Parser
Group wise
Interleaver
Block based
One for each spatial stream
Spatial streams separated by frequency rotation
QAM Modes
BPSK, QPSK, 16-QAM, 64-QAM
Antenna mapper
STBC and TxBF
iFFT
20 MHz: 56 tones (52 data tones + 4 pilots)
40 MHz: 114 tones (108 data tones + 6 pilots)
Mujtaba (Agere), Petranovich (Conexant), Fischer (Broadcom), Stephens (Intel) et. al.

19. JP PHY Key Parameters January 2006 Parameter JP PHY GI 800ns
400ns optional
Signal Bandwidth
20MHz, 40 MHz
Long MIMO Preamble
Long mixed mode preamble
Legacy compatibility: 100% interoperable
Supports per tone channel estimation
Supports frequency smoothing & interpolation
Compatible with beam forming
Short MIMO Preamble
GreenField optional
HT-SIG modulation
2 symbol 90 degree rotated Q-BPSK
Scrambler Init
SERVICE field in the MAC HDR
Mujtaba (Agere), Petranovich (Conexant), Fischer (Broadcom), Stephens (Intel) et. al.

20. JP PHY Key Parameters January 2006 Parameter JP PHY MCS Set
Symmetric MCS sets:
defined from BPSK to 64-QAM
Asymmetric MCS sets (for STBC & TxBF)
Pilot Tones
20 MHz
4 pilot tones
40 MHz
6 pilot tones
Advanced Codec
Low Density Parity Check Code
Sounding Packet Format
Staggered preamble & Zero-Length Frame (both optional)
Space-Time Block Codes
Codes defined:
2 x 1, 3 x 2, 4 x 2, 4 x 3, 3 x 1, 4 x 1
Optional
Mujtaba (Agere), Petranovich (Conexant), Fischer (Broadcom), Stephens (Intel) et. al.

21. MAC Architecture January 2006
Mujtaba (Agere), Petranovich (Conexant), Fischer (Broadcom), Stephens (Intel) et. al.

22. MAC Features – November 2005
January 2006
doc.: IEEE /0045r0
January 2006
MAC Features – November 2005
Mujtaba (Agere), Petranovich (Conexant), Fischer (Broadcom), Stephens (Intel) et. al.
Mujtaba (Agere), Petranovich (Conexant), Fischer (Broadcom), Stephens (Intel), Rosdahl (Samsung) et. al.

23. Proposed MAC Features January 2006 doc.: IEEE 802.11-06/0045r0
Mujtaba (Agere), Petranovich (Conexant), Fischer (Broadcom), Stephens (Intel) et. al.
Mujtaba (Agere), Petranovich (Conexant), Fischer (Broadcom), Stephens (Intel), Rosdahl (Samsung) et. al.

24. Summary Value of selected features
January 2006
Summary Value of selected features
Feature
Value
A-MPDU
About 2.5 × Data/Ack
A-MSDU
About 20% on top of A-MPDU
Reverse Direction
Roughly 25%
Enhanced BA
Roughly 5-10%
PSMP / MTBA
VoIP call density increase of up to 2 × non-PSMP
Mujtaba (Agere), Petranovich (Conexant), Fischer (Broadcom), Stephens (Intel) et. al.

25. January 2006
Next Steps
Mujtaba (Agere), Petranovich (Conexant), Fischer (Broadcom), Stephens (Intel) et. al.

26. Joint Proposal Timeline
January 2006
Joint Proposal Timeline
Hawaii
Final Joint Prop
Confirmation Vote
Draft Owned by TGn
F2F
San Fran
F2F
Anaheim
F2F
Vancouver
F2F
JAP
F2F
EUR
F2F
Weekly Conference Calls between F2F Meetings
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
DEC
JAN
2005
2006
Mujtaba (Agere), Petranovich (Conexant), Fischer (Broadcom), Stephens (Intel) et. al.

27. Please confirm the Joint Proposal
January 2006
Moving Forward
The Joint Proposal is now complete
All major open specification issues have been resolved
This mature proposal has been built by a broad industry wide consensus process
We believe that this is the best and most complete Proposal possible
Please confirm the Joint Proposal
Mujtaba (Agere), Petranovich (Conexant), Fischer (Broadcom), Stephens (Intel) et. al.

28. January 2006
Motion
Move to conduct a confirmation vote on the existing proposal of record, the Joint Proposal, in /1095r4 and /1102r4 pursuant to the selection process step 17 ( /0665r9).
Mujtaba (Agere), Petranovich (Conexant), Fischer (Broadcom), Stephens (Intel) et. al.