Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byMaría Luisa Parra Henríquez Modified over 6 years ago
1
Afterglow Plateau and Energy Injection from Magnetar:
A Clue to Cosmological Standard Candles M. Xu and Y. F. Huang Department of Astronomy, Nanjing University, China The Prompt Activity of Gamma-Ray Bursts: their Progenitors, Engines, and Radiation Mechanisms Raleigh, NC
2
Outline Afterglow Plateau Energy Injection (EI) from Magnetar
LT correlation LTE correlation Cosmological Standard Candles
3
Canonical X-ray afterglow light curve
Zhang et al. 2006; Nousek et al. 2006
4
Energy Injection from Magnetar
Fireball Energy Injection Kaspi et al. 2006
5
Afterglow and EI EI Xu et al. 2008, 2009
6
Phenomenological model
Willingale et al. 2007
7
LX*∝Ta*-1.06 LT correlation Ta*=Ta/(1+z) Dainotti et al. 2010
8
EI from Magnetar ∝ -1 LX*∝Ta*-1.06 Assumptions: ∝ ~ ~ constant
Same parameters for new born magnetars ---Cosmological standard candles ∝ -1
9
Energy Injection from Magnetar
e+e- Fireball EI Dai 2004
10
Relativistic wind bubble
Dai 2004
11
Einjection < EFireball
Yu & Dai, 2007
12
LX*-T*-Eγ,iso correlation
Dai 2004 EFireball ~ Einjection~ LW T LX* is related to fireball’s energy LX*-T*-Eγ,iso correlation
13
LTE correlation LX*∝Ta*-0.82Eγ,iso0.78 Xu & Huang 2011
14
LT vs LTE LTE correlation is much more tight than LT correlation.
LT: Log[L/1047erg/s]=0.77[±0.14] [±0.16] Log[T/103s] r=-0.73, P=5.6×10-8 σint=0.85±0.097 LTE correlation is much more tight than LT correlation. LTE: Log[L/1047erg/s]=0.73[±0.07] [±0.08] Log[T/103s] [±0.06] Log[Eiso/1053erg] r=0.92, P=1.84×10-20 σint=0.38±0.05
15
Intermediate class GRBs
LT correlation LTE correlation Long IC Dainotti et al. 2010 Xu & Huang 2011
16
Constrain the Cosmological parameters
Xu & Huang 2011
17
Summary Afterglow plateau might be resulted from EI from Magnetar LTE-correlation is much more tight than LT- correlation Candidates of Cosmological Standard Candles Thank you!
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.