Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Event management tool survey results

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Event management tool survey results"— Presentation transcript:

1 Event management tool survey results
May 2018

2 Research PURPOSE Event management tool landscape at UBC
Satisfaction levels Features required in a future tool

3 Survey Questions Current event tool used Satisfaction with current tool Feature requirements for a new tool Support needs Current expense on event tools

4 Major findings Current event management tool used Issues with current tool Benefits of current tool Current spend Required features for a new tool

5 Current Event tool

6 Satisfaction

7 Issues with current tool

8 Current spend

9 Top Required features

10 ALL Required features

11 Feature Requirement Details
Payment flexibility Foreign currencies, add a donation, generate invoice/receipts, ability to refund, PayPal, WeChat, Alipay Integration With Facebook, other social media, CRM, events calendar, website, finance, outlook calendar appointment Registration / ticketing flexibility Cap waitlists, tag/categorize registrations, set open and close times, verify identity as student/faculty/staff, pre-filled out fields for recurring registrants, ticket confirmations, discount codes Reporting Easy export of data Easy to use – event manager Reliable, not buggy, dashboard with # of guests, WYSIWYG editor

12 Feature Requirement Details (Cont’d)
Customize s for RSVP / follow up / invitations Include collateral for distribution, media, maps/directions Easy to use – for guests Simple, nice looking interface Customize event details Add custom fields, constituent ID, allow multi-day events Import / Export Import and export data to PDF, word, excel, etc. (for guest lists) Customize Branding Customize links/intuitive URL’s Register without account/password

13 Outlier Feature Requirements
Restriction to register based on user roles Ex. Ability to restrict registration of an event to post-doc’s only. Ex. Ability to restrict registration to undergraduate students in years 1-3.

14 Summary Users are not happy Tools are not FIPPA / PCI compliant
Most users do not have an expectation to pay for the tool There are simple needs and complex needs Most users want a high-level of support

15 Summary (Cont’d) Users want a tool that: Can be integrated
Has robust reporting Is user friendly Has the ability to send s Is flexible – payments, registration and ticketing Is customizable – fields for event details, branding templates Has export / import capabilities for attendee lists


Download ppt "Event management tool survey results"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google