Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
1
Integrated River Basin Management
MSc Programme Integrated River Basin Management Elective Course on Irrigation and Drainage Planning Block 1 - Irrigation & Drainage Development in IRBM perspective in the context of Ethiopia 1.4 Multiple Use System that respond to multiple demands (not only crops)
2
1.4 Multiple Use System that respond to multiple demands
Irrigation water produces more than just grain Providing access to “marginal” users, for livelihood security Opportunities, but also trade-offs in optimizing joint product of all uses & users In design all uses and users need to be identified
3
MUS activities in Ethiopia, Katar II scheme- Assela
Support for domestic activities Possibilities of SHPP Cattle support
4
Multiple Use System that respond to multiple demands
The idea initiated from people’s multiple water needs Traditional irrigation is only meant for single use system; only crop demand Irrigation water, when supplied to rural communities can meet demands of: Crop demand Homestead garden Water for cattle Aquaculture (habitats for fish) Rural enterprise water supplies Here the total demand is computed as: Net water demand = net irrigation crop water demand + side demands of other water uses
5
MUS supports important cultural values and functions that are essential for local well-being and livelihoods through providing: Other agricultural purposes, such as irrigating home gardens, watering livestock; Equipment, soaking fodder; Domestic purposes, such as laundry, bathing, washing household utensils, soaking grains, cooking, drinking, House cleaning, sanitation; Commercial purposes, usually small-scale activities or home industries, such as brick making, butcher’s or other Shops, washing vehicles, pottery, mat weaving; Other productive purposes, usually non-consumptive, such as fisheries and water mills; Recreation.
6
Merits of MUS Provide ecological benefits such as biodiversity conservation; MUS leads to higher water productivity (e.g. household income, nutrition, and health) “more use per drop”; MUS can provide the most vulnerable users with low cost services; Implicitly gender-friendly; Enhancing willingness and ability to pay.
7
Costs of MUS Multiple-use services cost marginally more than single-use services but generate greater income and poverty impacts. The costs are both in the hardware and software. Hardware: infrastructural, construction, operation, and maintenance, and the required engineering skills Software costs: transaction costs, especially for planning, institution building and backstopping, and costs for other skill development. If irrigation water directly used for domestic purpose it can pose a health risk, thus users need awareness.
8
MUS assignment Q-7 Explain MUS from the environmental, social and economic perspective? Identify the challenges of developing a platform that accommodate different user groups (MUS) for improving the overall productivity as well as equity of water use in a scheme?
9
Reading Material Compulsory Reading
Multiple-Use Water Services to Advance the Millennium Development Goals, IWMI research report 98, (Pages 5-20) Further Reading Multi uses of Irrigation water in the Hakra distributary command area,Pakistan. International irrigation management institute (IIMI), 1998
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.