Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
1
Federal funding now and in the future: How child psychiatry can succeed
Christopher Sarampote, PhD Director, Office of Training and Career Development Division of Developmental Translational Research, NIMH
2
Disclosures Dr. Sarampote is a full-time employee of the National Institutes of Mental Health, with no conflicts of interest to disclose
3
Agenda Overview of NIMH structure and priorities
The Role of the Research Domain Criteria Project (RDoC) in NIMH research funding NIMH’s updated priorities and strategies for clinical trials research Final thoughts
4
NIMH Divisions Mission: To transform the understanding and treatment of mental illnesses through basic and clinical research, paving the way for prevention, recovery, and cure Adult Translational (DATR) Developmental (DDTR) AIDS/HIV (DAR) Neuroscience & Basic Behavioral (DNBBS) Services & Interventions (DSIR) Intramural Research (DIRP) Pre-Clinical/Basic Research Psychopathology & Tx Development (1st in Human studies) Effectiveness, Services, Implementation/Dissemination Extramural Activities (DEA)
5
Training at NIMH Training awards by career stage: F, K
T32 institutional awards MD/PhD PhD Award Types Career Stage Graduate/ Medical Student Independent Investigator F32 K02 Postdoc Phase F30 F31 R36 High School/ Undergraduate Diversity and Reentry Research Supplements K24 K99 / R00 Faculty Position K01, K08 K23
6
NIMH Strategic Plan (2008) Strategic Objective 1: Promote discovery in the brain and behavioral sciences to fuel research on the causes of mental disorders Strategic Objective 2: Chart mental illness trajectories to determine when, where, and how to intervene Strategic Objective 3: Develop new and better interventions for mental disorders that incorporate the diverse needs and circumstances of people with mental illness Strategic Objective 4: Strengthen the public health impact of NIMH-supported research
7
GenesNeural CircuitsBehaviorDisease Phenotype
Strategic Objective #1: Promote Discovery in the Brain and Behavioral Sciences to Fuel Research on the Causes of Mental Disorders GenesNeural CircuitsBehaviorDisease Phenotype Strategic Objective #1 Examples include: Integrative approaches to understand neuro-functioning Identify genetic and epigenetic components of pathophysiology Identify biomarkers Reconstruct mental disorders Meyer-Lindenberg & Weinberger, Nature Rev Neurosci, 2006
8
Strategic Objective #2: Chart Mental Illness Trajectories to Determine When, Where and How to Intervene Healthy Gray Matter Maturation Age 4 Age 10 Slide showing that gray matter brain loss in Childhood Onset Schizophrenia appears to be an exaggeration of the normal maturation process. Pink indicates greater brain matter loss. Thompson et al, 2001, Proc Natl Acad Sci, 98, Gogtay et al, 2004, Arch Gen Psych, 61, Childhood Onset Schizophrenia Gray Matter Loss Adult P-value Adapted from: Thompson et al, Proc Natl Acad Sci, 2001 & Gogtay et al, Arch Gen Psychiatry, 2004
9
Strategic Objective #3: Develop New and Better Interventions for Mental Disorders that Incorporate the Diverse Needs and Circumstances of People with Mental Illness Strategy 3.1: Further develop innovative interventions and designs for intervention studies Strategy 3.2: Expand and deepen the focus to personalize intervention research Strategy 3.3: Strengthen the application of mental health interventions in diverse care settings by examining community and intervention delivery approaches and how they may affect intervention outcomes Strategy 3.4: Identify and systematically study elements of personalized mental health care Strategy 3.1: Further develop innovative interventions and designs for intervention studies: Including translating basic science into novel interventions and novel targets and strategies Strategy 3.2: Expand and deepen the focus to personalize intervention research TO most efficiently deploy existing interventions and match individuals with current interventions that they are most likely to benefit from. Strategy 3.3: Strengthen the application of mental health interventions By developing and testing more practice ready interventions that are scalable and disseminable and more likely to have an impact on practice and policy.
10
Strategic Objective #4: Strengthen the Public Health Impact of NIMH-Supported Research
26.2% Impact Gap % U.S. Adults 10.8% 12-month diagnosable disorders in the NCS-R Goal of SO4 is to make more of an impact on public health, and make sure that everyone that is diagnosed with a disorder receives adequate treatment. 3.5% Adapted from: Kessler et al, Arch Gen Psychiatry, 2005 & Wang et al, Arch Gen Psychiatry, 2006
11
Strategic Objective #4 Research Priorities
Effectiveness of mental health preventative, treatment and rehabilitative interventions, alone or in combination, for children and adolescents Services organization, delivery and related health economics Clinical epidemiology of mental disorders across all clinical and service settings Dissemination and Implentation Development of innovative ways of disseminating information to stakeholders (e.g., new technologies, multimedia approaches) Novel methods of Development to address the multidimensional components of dissemination and implementation (consumer, practitioner, clinic, state) Implementation studies of addressing organizational outcomes around sustainability
12
Mental Disorders: A Neurodevelopmental Perspective
JAMA May 7, 2014 Vol 311(17) MH Advisory Council workgroup report on neurodevelopmental research in 2008 recommended: Research on how healthy trajectories become altered Research on Characterization of sensitive periods of neurodevelopment that are open at specific times in development, which might be amenable or susceptible to the environment Research on intervention research that would aim to bend trajectories of neurodevelopment early on, before the illness is apparent. There are examples of these workgroup reports on the website, and we often use these to stimulate research in the area, so it is a good thing to keep your eyes on.
13
Early Prediction & Preemption
Challenge: Identify and delineate disease processes early in neurodevelopment, before the onset of symptoms.
14
Division of Developmental Translational Research
TARGETED INTERVENTIONS Targeted treatments Preemptive strategies Mechanisms of action Neurobiological Mechanisms Neurobiological, genetic, experiential influences Biologically based markers Dimensional Phenotypic Measurement Sex Differences Developmental Trajectories Integrative longitudinal models of risk Sensitive periods in development Early identification and prediction
15
Guiding Framework Priorities Development: Maturation/Sensitive Periods
Disease Origins Pre-Symptomatic Early Symptoms to Prodrome Disease I. Delineate Risk – Enhance Prediction II. Identify biomarkers and mechanisms of risk/illness Priorities III. Chart trajectories of illness across development IV. Develop innovative, personalized interventions Development: Maturation/Sensitive Periods
16
Early Symptoms to Prodrome
State of the Science Disease Origins Pre-Symptomatic Early Symptoms to Prodrome Disease Prediction Mechanism Trajectories Intervention Underrepresented Developing Active
17
Research Domain Criteria (RDoC)
18
Research Domain Criteria (RDoC)
Current psychiatric diagnosis strengths: Clusters of signs & symptoms Utility at a time of limited knowledge in genetics, neuroscience, behavioral science Clinically useful: clinical phenotypes, course of disorders Increased reliability (since DSM-III) Dissemination throughout medical, legal, social services systems Suboptimal for research: Emphasis on reliability over validity Heterogeneity of disorders Extensive co-morbidity Antedates current knowledge of brain and behavior Difficult to relate diagnoses to genes, particular circuits, or basic behavioral mechanisms Transition: What do we make of the fact that supposedly different disorders occur together -- clearly, they are not all different, so how do we go about sorting out the differences?
19
RDoC (cont) Uncoupling of research questions from DSM categories might be required to develop an understanding of psychopathology founded in the integration of biology and psychology Translational approach to link mechanisms and symptoms Dimensional approach involving multiple levels of analysis Framework to study mechanisms that cut across traditional diagnostic categories Goals: Integration of biological and psychological constructs New treatment targets Creation of an “Information Commons” Increasing share of NIMH-funded research
20
RDoC (cont)
21
Updated NIMH Clinical Trials Priorities
22
Updated Clinical Trials Priorities & Strategies
Limited recent progress at identifying new drug/psychosocial targets and novel strategies. Efficacy findings from small trials often do not hold up. Standard intervention testing focused on symptom change outcomes yields limited information about disease/intervention mechanisms (e.g., in the event of a failed trial). Limited understanding about potential targets/mechanisms (for pharmacological, behavioral/psychotherapeutic, and other modalities) has impeded efforts to develop novel targets/strategies or optimize existing approaches (e.g., to enhance potency or efficiency). Over the past few years, the NIMH DIRECTOR’s BLOG has highlighted some CONCERNS about: --The TRADITIONAL APPROACH to intervention development and Testing --The limited Yield from these traditional research approaches. SPECIFICALLY….. 1—Limited progress at identifying new targets and novel strategies 2—Findings from EFFICACY trials are often INCONCLUSIVE or DO NOT HOLD UP 3—the MAIN focus on SYMPTOM CHANGE OUTCOMES yields little info about disease or intervention mechanisms. 4—Finally, across all intervention modalities (Pharm, Psyhosocial, other approaches), Limited understanding about mechanisms has been a RATE-LIMITING FACTOR in developing novel targets/strategies or optimizing existing approaches. NIMH Director’s Blog ( Februrary 27, 2014, “A New Approach to Clinical Trials”; June 12, 2012, “Experimental Medicine”; December 14, 2011, “Treatment Development: The Past 50 Years”
23
Rationale for Updated Priorities & Strategies
Experimental Therapeutics…. Future trials will follow an experimental medicine approach in which interventions serve not only as potential treatments, but as probes to generate information about the mechanisms underlying a disorder. Trial proposals will need to identify a target or mediator (and specify a corresponding plan to assess target engagement). For treatment development, the assessment of target engagement informs a “go/no-go” decision: only if the intervention adequately engages the target, further research then addresses whether intervention-related changes in the target affect clinical outcomes. Positive results require not only that an intervention ameliorated a symptom, but that it had a demonstrable effect on a target, such as a neural pathway implicated in the disorder or a key cognitive operation. CONSEQUENTLY, NIMH is adopting a more EXPLICIT EXPERIMENTAL THERAPEUTICS approach to intervention development and testing The approach places a more UP-FRONT and CENTRAL FOCUS on INTEROGATING INTERVENTION TARGETS and MECHANISMs throughout ALL STAGES of INTERVENTION TESTING + DEVELOPMENT UNDER THIS APPROACH 1—interventions serve not only as potential txs, but also as PROBES to generate information of relevant TARGETS and DISEASE mechanisms 2—ALL trials will be expected to identify targets and specify a plan to assess whether the intervention engages the target 3—for Tx development, the assessment of target engagement informs a GO/NO-GO decision: only if the tx engages the target, then further research would be conducted to see if tx-induced target changes are associated with clinical benefit 4—trials will need to be poised to demonstrate not only whether there was clinical benefit, but also whether the tx had a effect on a key target, such as a neural pathway or key cognitive operation implicated in the disorder. NIMH Director’s Blog ( Februrary 27, 2014, “A New Approach to Clinical Trials”; June 12, 2012, “Experimental Medicine”; December 14, 2011: “Treatment Development: The Past 50 Years”
24
Updated Priorities & Strategies –Overall Approach
NOT-MH NIMH Policy for Submission of Applications Containing Clinical Trials February 25, 2014 Beginning with applications submitted for the June 5, 2014 submission date and all subsequent applicable deadlines, NIMH will not accept R01, R21, or R03 applications that include clinical trials of potential therapies for mental disorders, under: NIH parent R01 FOA PA NIH parent R21 FOA PA NIH Parent R03 FOA PA , … and subsequent reissuances of these FOAs. As a first step to implementing these approaches, NIMH issued a notice that we will no longer accept TRIALS RESEARCH under the OMNIBUS, PARENT ANNOUCEMENTS for investigator-initiaied R01s, R21s, or R03s
25
Updated Priorities & Strategies –Overall Approach
Discontinuation of Former Clinical Trials FOAs: NOT-MH : NIMH Announces Discontinuation of PAR "Collaborative R34s for Pilot Studies of Innovative Treatments in Mental Disorders (Collaborative R34) " NOT-MH : Notice to Discontinue Participation of NIMH in PAR "Pilot Intervention and Services Grants (R34)" We also issued GUIDE NOTICES to discontinue formers ANNOUNCEMENTS that were used to solicit trials research, including the R34 mechanisms and Collaborative R01. NOT-MH : NIMH announces the expiration of PAR "Collaborative R01s for Clinical and Services Studies of Mental Disorders and AIDS (Collaborative R01)"
26
Clinical Trial Pipeline and New NIMH Funding Initiatives
First in Human (Drugs) Exploratory Experimental Therapeutics Target engagement Confirmatory Efficacy Effectiveness, Dissemination R21/R33 Exploratory Clinical Trials of Novel Interventions for Mental Disorders R34 Pilot Effectiveness Studies and Services Research Grants TBD Companion R33 Exploratory Clinical Trials of Novel Interventions for Mental Disorders R01 Clinical Trials to Test the Effectiveness of Treatment, Preventive, and Services Interventions The new set of FOAs include 6 announcements, including 3 FOAs to support novel treatment and 3 FOAS to support EFFECTIVENESS RESEARCH. U01 (New Chemical Entities) First in Human and Early Stage Clinical Trials of Novel Investigational Drugs or Devices for Psychiatric Disorders Collaborative R01 Clinical Trials to Test the Effectiveness of Treatment, Preventive, and Services Interventions
27
NIMH Fast-Fail Trials Aims: 1.) quickly identify compounds that merit more extensive testing; 2.) identify targets in the brain for the development of additional candidate compounds Conduct trials in small, human samples (10-30 subjects) to assess: Does the compound engage a target in the brain (e.g., a specific receptor in brain cells or alter signaling in the brain by a specific neurotransmitter?) Does it measurably alter a feature of the brain function (e.g., test of memory, cognition or attention?) Teams Andrew Krystal, MD: Duke University – Mood and Anxiety Spectrum Disorders Jeffrey Lieberman, MD: Research Foundation for Mental Hygiene – Psychotic Spectrum Disorders James McCracken, MD: UCLA – Autism Spectrum Disorders D
28
Final Thoughts Advances in basic neuroscience (neuroscience, genetics, basic behavioral) offer unprecedented opportunities to elucidate the pathophysiology of disorders A mechanistic approach to disorders and their underlying components is essential to both the understanding of mental illness and its treatment Early prediction and preventative intervention of mental illness before behavioral symptoms present is a high research priority New biomarkers of risk and targets for intervention are needed to develop new strategies for treatment and prevention Team science and collaboration that draws on basic and clinical disciplines is necessary to advance the field Reproducibility and transparency of findings are crucial to ensuring the impact of our research Awareness of NIMH research priorities is critical to successful grant funding
29
Sources of Information
Research Priorities Sources of Information Institute Priorities on Website: NIMH Strategic Plan Division Description & Priorities on Webpage Funding Opportunity Announcements (FOAs), also known as PA and RFA Scientific Meetings/Workshop Reports (webpage) and NAMHC Workgroup Reports (webpage) NAMHC Concept Clearances
30
Concept Clearances
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.