Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
1
Laboratoire de L’Accélérateur Linéaire
Analytical Treatment of Some Nonlinear Beam Dynamics Problems in Storage Rings J. Gao Laboratoire de L’Accélérateur Linéaire CNRS-IN2P3, FRANCE 30th Advanced ICFA Beam Dynamics Workshop on High Luminosity e+e- Colliders Stanford, California, Oct , 2003.
2
Contents Dynamic Apertures of Multipoles in a Storage Ring
Dynamic Apertures limited by Wigglers Limitations on Luminosities in Lepton Circular Colliders from Beam-Beam Effects Nonlinear Space Charge Effect Nonlinear electron cloud effect
3
Dynamic Aperturs of Multipoles
Hamiltonian of a single multipole Where L is the circumference of the storage ring, and s* is the place where the multipole locates (m=3 corresponds to a sextupole, for example).
4
Important Steps to Treat the Perturbed Hamiltonian
Using action-angle variables Hamiltonian differential equations should be replaced by difference equations Since under some conditions the Hamiltonian don’t have even numerical solutions
5
Standard Mapping Near the nonlinear resonance, simplify the difference equations to the form of STANDARD MAPPING
6
Stochastic motions When stochastic motion starts. Statistical descriptions of the nonlinear chaotic motions of particles are subjects of research nowadays. As a preliminary method, one can resort to Fokker-Planck equation .
7
General Formulae for the Dynamic Apertures of Multipoles
8
Super-ACO Lattice Working point
9
Single octupole limited dynamic aperture simulated by using BETA
x-y plane x-xp phase plane
10
Comparisions between analytical and numerical results
Sextupole Octupole
11
2D dynamic apertures of a sextupole
Simulation result Analytical result
12
Wiggler Ideal wiggler magnetic fields
13
One cell wiggler One cell wiggler Hamiltonian
One cell wiggler limited dynamic aperture
14
Full wiggler and multi-wigglers
Dynamic aperture for a full wiggler or approximately where is the beta function in the middle of the wiggler
15
Full wiggler and multi-wigglers
Many wigglers (M) Dynamic aperture in horizontal plane
16
Numerical example: Super-ACO
Super-ACO lattice with wiggler switched off
17
Super-ACO (one wiggler)
18
Super-ACO (one wiggler)
19
Super-ACO (one wiggler)
20
Super-ACO (one wiggler)
21
Super-ACO (two wigglers)
22
Maximum Beam-Beam Tune Shift in Circular Colliders
Luminosity of a circular collider where
23
Beam-beam interactions
Kicks from beam-beam interaction at IP
24
Beam-beam effects on a beam
We study three cases (RB) (FB) (FB)
25
Round colliding beam Hamiltonian
26
Flat colliding beams Hamiltonians
27
Dynamic apertures limited by beam-beam interactions
Three cases Beam-beam effect limited lifetime (RB) (FB) (FB)
28
Recall of Beam-beam tune shift definitions
29
Beam-beam effects limited beam lifetimes
Round beam Flat beam H plane Flat beam V plane
30
Important finding Defining normalized beam-beam effect limited beam lifetime as An important fact has been discovered that the beam-beam effect limited normalized beam lifetime depends on only one parameter: linear beam-beam tune shift.
31
Theoretical predictions for beam-beam tune shifts
Relation between round and flat colliding beams For example
32
The roles for higher order poles
33
First limit of beam-beam tune shift (lepton machine)
or, for an isomagnetic machine where Ho=2845 *These expersions are derived from emittance blow up mechanism
34
Second limit of beam-beam tune shift (lepton machine)
Flat beam V plane where xy should be replaced by xy / xy,max,1
35
Some Examples DAFNE: E=0.51GeV,xymax,theory=0.043,xymax,exp=0.02
BEPC: E=1.89GeV,xymax,theory=0.04,xymax,exp=0.04 PEP-II Low energy ring: E=3.12GeV,xymax,theory=0.063,xymax,exp=0.06 KEK-B Low energy ring (with crossing angle!): E=3.5GeV,xymax,theory=0.0832,xymax,exp=0.069 CESR: E=5.3GeV,xymax,theory=0.048,xymax,exp=0.025 LEP-II: E=91.5GeV,xymax,theory=0.071,xymax,exp=0.07
36
Some Examples (continued)
PEP-II High energy ring: E=8.99GeV,xymax,theory=0.048,xymax,exp=0.048 KEK-B High energy ring: E=8GeV,xymax,theory=0.0533,xymax,exp=0.05
37
Beam-beam effects with crossing angle
Horizontal motion Hamiltonian Dynamic aperture limited by synchro-betatron coupling
38
Crossing angle effect Dynamic aperture limited by synchro-betatron coupling Total beam-beam limited dynamic aperture Where is Piwinski angle
39
KEK-B with crossing angle
KEK-B luminosity reduction vs Piwinski angle
40
The Limitation from Space Charge Forces to TESLA Dog-Borne Damping Ring
Total space charge tune shift Differential space charge tune shift Beam-beam tune shift
41
Space charge effect Relation between differential space charge and beam-beam forces
42
Space charge effect limited dynamic apertures
Dynamic aperture limited by differential space charge effect Dynamic aperture limited by the total space charge effect
43
Space charge limited lifetime
Space charge effect limited lifetime expressions Particle survival ratio
44
TESLA Dog-Borne damping ring as an example
Particle survival ratio vs linear space charge tune shift when the particles are ejected from the damping ring. TESLA parameters
45
Nonlinear electron cloud effect
Relation between differential electron cloud and beam-beam forces
46
Nonlinear electron cloud effect
Normalized dynamic aperture due to electron cloud
47
Combined nonlinear beam-beam and electron cloud effect
Normalized dynamic aperture due to combined beam-beam and electron cloud effects
48
Combined nonlinear beam-beam and electron cloud effect
Beam lifetime due to the combined effect where is the damping time of positron in the vertical plane
49
PEP-II positron ring as an example
Machine parameter
50
PEP-II positron ring as an example
Machine parameter
51
PEP-II positron ring as an example
If the beam-beam alone limited maximum beam-beam tune shift is with the maximum beam-beam tune shift will be reduced to
52
Conclusion Various nonlinear effects are the main limiting factors to the performance of storage rings. In addition to numerical simulations, analytical treatments are very helpful in understanding the physics behind the phenomena, are very economic.
Similar presentations
© 2024 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.