Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Research and Evaluation in Telehealth

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Research and Evaluation in Telehealth"— Presentation transcript:

1 Research and Evaluation in Telehealth
Suparna Qanungo, PhD Assistant Professor, College of Nursing Director, Telehealth Research Program Jillian Harvey, PhD Assistant Professor, Healthcare Leadership & Management Director, Division of Doctor of Health Administration

2 Key Steps to Develop a Telehealth Research Study
Idea generation Partnership/collaboration Research Methods and Design Data Collection Data Analysis Evaluation of Outcomes Dissemination

3 Idea Generation It all starts with a research or program-related question/idea
Is the telehealth research question/idea something I/others care about? Will the telehealth research idea address a problem? Will the telehealth research idea reach the intended population/community? Is the telehealth research idea feasible within the given time frame and location? Does the telehealth research question/idea lead into a testable hypothesis? Can the telehealth research question/idea produce data/ results of the tested hypothesis that can be replicated? Does the telehealth research idea have a clear purpose

4 Telehealth Idea is Here: What Do you Do Next?
Literature Search What is out there? How have others done similar work? Where is the gap? How can you bridge the gap Partnership/Collaboration Courtesy 123 RF.com Sustainable Funding

5 Telehealth Idea is Here: What Do you Do Next?
Partnership/Collaboration Strong organizational/community partners Telehealth needs and interest match Strong leadership and dedicated commitment Key stakeholders and consumers engaged Open to change in culture Trusted team spirit Evaluation of outcomes

6 Research Methods Develop appropriate telehealth research protocol Study Design (Qualitative, Quantitative, Mixed Method) Participant Recruitment and Informed Consent Data Collection and Analysis Evaluation of Outcomes

7 Qualitative vs. Quantitative Study Design
ASPECT QUALITATIVE QUANTITATIVE Focus of research Quality (nature, essence) Quantity (how much, how many) Philosophical Roots Phenomenology, symbolic interaction Positivism, logical empiricism Common Purpose Understanding, interpretation, discover ideas, hypothesis generating Prediction, control, confirmation, causal explanation, hypothesis testing Approach Observe and interpret Measure and test Design Characteristics Flexible, free form, evolving, emergent Predetermined, structured Setting Natural, familiar Artificial, unfamiliar Sample Small, non-random, theoretical Large, random, representative, generalizability Researcher independence Researcher is intimately involved, “Emic” (insider perspective) Researcher uninvolved observer, “Etic” (outsider perspective) View of reality Subjective Objective Data collection Researcher as primary instrument, interviews, observation Inanimate instruments (scales, tests, surveys, questionnaires) Mode of analysis Inductive (by researchers) Deductive (by statistical methods) Findings Comprehensive, holistic Precise, narrow, reductionist

8 Recruitment and Informed Consent
Traditional Paper Consent Teleconsent E-Consent All Need IRB Approval…… Attend Telehealth Seminar Series April 18, 2018 at MUSC Center for Telehealth…. Considerations for IRB Approval

9 Teleconsent (Remote Recruitment)

10 Telehealth Use in Research

11 Examples of Telehealth Research at MUSC
Mealtime Interventions for Caregivers/Dementia Patients at Respite Care Centers HIV and substance use prevention program in Latina adolescents Telehealth research for prenatal care Trauma-focused Cognitive Behavioral Therapy Peer Navigator interventions for individuals with spinal cord injury Changes in smoking behavior with e-Cigs Tele-mental Health in PTSD Tele-stroke School-based Telehealth

12 Data Collection Techniques/Sources (Qualitative)
Observations (e.g. photovoice) Documents Artifacts Interviews Focus groups

13 Data Collection Techniques/Sources (Quantitative)
Primary and Secondary Data Sources Closed/structured Questionnaires Surveys Instruments/Scales/Logs Experiments Comparative Methods

14 Telehealth Data Evaluation and Outcomes

15 Rigorous evaluations of telemedicine outcomes and cost are needed
“Telehealth research in real-world settings requires alternative research designs, new research methods, and innovative analytic techniques that supplement traditional randomized, controlled trials and should be supported with enhanced funding and an expanded workforce” Source: Tuckson, R.V., Edmunds, M., & Hodgkins, M.L. (2017). Telehealth. The New England Journal of Medicine. 377:16,

16 Telehealth Research Literature indicates several telehealth programs have a sufficient evidence base1-4 Effectiveness for remote monitoring, communication, counseling for chronic conditions and psychotherapy support of behavioral interventions Evidence that telehealth can improve access to care Patient satisfaction and Provider technical satisfaction Some evidence on improved efficiencies (reducing wait times, travel costs, transports) Mixed results related to utilization/cost More research is needed1-4 Implementation Delivery and payment models Specific interventions lack empirical evidence (Intensive Care, Maternal & Child Health, Triage for urgent care, primary care) Financial and cost effectiveness

17 Telehealth Methodological Challenges
Small n across specific telehealth programs (and counties) Matching issues Apples to Apples Comparisons Vast differences in care protocols & equipment across organizations Differences in state level Medicaid and Parity coverage and reimbursement New terminology: What defines a telehealth consult? Traditional control variables may not fit Two Institutions (e.g. jail & hospital) Selection Bias Time

18 Telehealth Data Challenges
Telehealth presents unique data challenges Claims data (identifying claims and rurality restrictions) Patient registries (missing data and sharing information across organizations) Electronic Medical Records (pulling information, accuracy)

19 Research? Program Evaluation? Quality Improvement?5
Can be indistinguishable Examine relationship between variables Qualitative, Quantitative, and mixed-methods Systematic Research: Seeks conclusions and/or building the scientific knowledge base (independent from routine care) Rigid protocol Generalizable IRB: Often randomized or testing new intervention. Possible risk in participating Evaluation: Explores program, intervention, treatment, or policy Facilitates decisions Can be formative or summative Participants may be selected by the program leadership Seeks understanding of program objectives/outcomes, program characteristics, program cost/value, quality, fidelity, etc. What?, So what?, Now what? (Patton, 2008) May be context specific QI: Data guided activities to bring about change or improvements Used for ongoing management of care and processes Adaptive, iterative

20 Evaluation of Outcomes
Requires careful planning and complete data collection Five key steps of outcomes research6 Researchable Question Conceptual Model Literature Review Operationalize the Variables Research Plan

21 National Quality Forum6: Domains & Subdomains of Telehealth Measurement
Examples Access to Care -Access for patient, family, and/or caregiver -Access for care team -Access to information Financial Impact/Cost -Financial impact to patient, family, and/or caregiver -Financial impact to care team -Financial impact to healthcare system or payer -Financial impact to society Experience -Patient, family, and/or caregiver experience -Care team member experience -Community experience Effectiveness -System effectiveness -Clinical effectiveness -Operational effectiveness -Technical effectiveness

22 Data Collection Plan Hypothesis/ Question
Metric Operational Definition Collection Process Data Source Timing Collected by: Analysis & Notes 1. Readmissions will decline in telehealth communities, and this decline will be greater in telehealth communities than nationally. 30 day readm. Rate- all cause Secondary Dartmouth Annual, Oct, Jim Difference-in-difference modeling to estimate changes in intervention communities versus nationally 2. How does the implementation of telehealth interventions impact Door to needle time? Mean door-to-needle time in minutes from patient registration to receipt of tPA REACH REACH export Monthly Pat Exclude: those who had a thrombectomy. QA check on any DTN over 270 minutes

23 Dissemination Dissemination: Purposeful distribution of information and intervention materials to a specific audience US healthcare system has done a poor job of putting research findings into practice7 Innovations of unknown/poor evidence base are frequently spread8 Dissemination Plan: Develop at start of project Who is the audience? Study participants, funders, communities, policy makers, How to reach the audience? Different wording, formats & methods Present! Publish! Outside of tele journals

24 Conclusion Rigorous evaluations of telemedicine outcomes and cost are needed There are many research methods that can be applied (selection needs to be driven by the research question) The telehealth infrastructure in South Carolina provides a fantastic opportunity to explore telehealth models Collaboration & planning are essential for telehealth research (e.g. clinicians, administrators, staff, researchers) Statewide resources are available: Pilot grants, CTSA, especially for cross organization/discipline partnerships

25 References 1. Tuckson, R.V., Edmunds, M., & Hodgkins, M.L. (2017). Telehealth. The New England Journal of Medicine. 377:16, Ashwood, J.S., Mehrotra, A., Cowling, D., & Uscher-Pines. (2017). Direct-to-Consumer telehealth may increase access to care but does not decrease spending. Health Affairs. 36(3). 3.Edmunds, Margo; Tuckson, Reed; Lewis, Joy; Atchinson, Brian; Rheuban, Karen; Fanberg, Hank; Olinger, Lois; Rosati, Robert; Austein-Casnoff, Cheryl; Capistrant, Gary; and Thomas, Latoya (2017) "An Emergent Research and Policy Framework for Telehealth," eGEMs (Generating Evidence & Methods to improve patient outcomes): Vol. 5: Iss. 2, Article 1. DOI: Available at: 4. Kane, R.L. & Radosevich, D.V. (2011). Conducting health outcomes in research. Jones & Bartlett Learning: Sudbury, MA. 5. CHOP (2018). Quality Improvement vs. Research. Available at: 6.National Quality Forum. (2017). Creating a Framework to Support Measure Development for Telehealth. Available at: 7. NIH. (2018). National Information Center on Health Services Research and Health Care Technology Dearing, J.W., (2009). Applying diffusion of innovation theory to intervention development. Research on Social Work Practice, 19(5):


Download ppt "Research and Evaluation in Telehealth"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google