1. 2) Current trend slide (IEA or similar)
1) Slide visualizing the different commitments (SDG, COP, FFD, Brasilia) related to mobility
2) Current trend slide (IEA or similar)
3) Negative trends (Road Safety-associated with climate change)
3) Positive trend slide
4) Good practices
5) Solution slide (like a puzzle with pictures) separated to A-S-I
6) Vertical integration slide – how to align global/national/local
7) BRT number as an example on scale (Dario – visualizing what we shared during COE meeting
8) 3*3 examples for integrated action on global, national, local level
9) Conclusion
Holger dalkmann with support from Alyssa Fischer, dario hidalgo, and juan miguel velasquez, wri ross center for sustainable cities

2. Multiple global commitments
PARIS AGREEMENT
88% of INDCs identifying specific transport modes
Lima to Paris Action Agenda LPAA: 10 initiatives in transport
Paris Process on Mobility and Climate PPMC: 15 initiatives
TARGET SDG 9.1
Develop quality, reliable, sustainable and resilient infrastructure, including regional and transborder infrastructure, to support economic development and human well-being, with a focus on affordable and equitable access for all
TARGET SDG 11.2
Provide access to safe, affordable, accessible and sustainable transport systems for all, improving road safety, notably by expanding public transport, with special attention to the needs of those in vulnerable situations, women, children, persons with disabilities and older persons
BRASILIA DECLARATION ON ROAD SAFETY
Halve road traffic deaths by 2020 –SDG Target 3.6
FFD
Special challenges and needs of landlocked developing countries, harnessing benefits from international trade, and developing efficient transport and transit systems
HABITAT III
New Urban Agenda

3. mobility options on the rise, but transport still on an unsustainable path
200+ cities have enacted Low Emission Zones since 2003, becoming part of the mainstream in Europe
188 cities with metro systems since the first in 1863 in London, Great Britain
1000+ cities with carsharing programs since the first in Lucerne & Zurich, Switzerland in 1987, have become mainstream in the EU and North America
Nearly 500 cities with bikesharing programs since the first in Rennes, France in 1998; beginning to mainstream in Europe
213 carfree zones in Europe since the first in Rotterdam, Netherlands in 1953
250+ cities with integrated fare systems since the first in Zurich, Switzerland in 1989
Source: EMBARQ;

4. Solutions known, but integration, implementation and finance are limited

5. Insufficient recognition of needs and enabling environment, including finance

6. Need to integrate the processes into a single visión
From needs to enabling environment

7. For example: using the coallition of Mobilise your City (promoted by CODATU) to inform the Habitat III declaration, which in turn influences national policies to support sustainable mobility and compact urban development with finance and capacity builiding, and then local implementation by cities. There is support from Development Instittuions and NGOs in capacity building and finance, in each of the stages.

8. The Way forward

9. 1) Slide visualizing the different commitments (SDG, COP, FFD, Brasilia) related to mobility
2) Current trend slide (IEA or similar)
3) Negative trends (Road Safety-associated with climate change)
3) Positive trend slide
4) Good practices
5) Solution slide (like a puzzle with pictures) separated to A-S-I
6) Vertical integration slide – how to align global/national/local
7) BRT number as an example on scale (Dario – visualizing what we shared during COE meeting
8) 3*3 examples for integrated action on global, national, local level
9) Conclusion