Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
1
Antimicrobial Stewardship: Why Should I Care?
Edina Avdic, Pharm.D., MBA, BCPS, AQ-ID Associate Director, Antimicrobial Stewardship Program Program Director, Infectious Diseases Pharmacy Residency The Johns Hopkins Hospital
2
Objectives Discuss the rationale for implementation of antimicrobial stewardship program List benefits of antimicrobial stewardship program to patients and health care facilities
3
Why Should You Care about Antimicrobial Stewardship?
Joint Commission requires it! 50% of hospitalized patients in the U.S. receive at least 1 antimicrobial 20-50% of prescribed antibiotics in U.S are unnecessary or inappropriate Up to 28% of hospitalized patients experience antimicrobial-associated adverse events, including C. difficile infections Antibiotic misuse contributes to antibiotic resistance Development of new antibiotics is slow and expensive According to 2011 CDC point prevalence survey: 33% receive at least one antimicrobial, 12% at least two, 5% at least 3. Nursing homes 11% of patient are prescribed antibiotics Patients who are unnecessarily exposed to antibiotics are placed at risk for serious adverse events with no clinical benefit. Magill SS, et al. JAMA 2014;312(14): ; ; accessed 3/4/18
4
Joint Commission Requirement
8 elements of performance 1 removed: education of patients and their families about antibiotics and resistance accessed 3/3/18
5
Antibiotic Stewardship
CDC Core Elements for Antibiotic Stewardship CDC had developed a Core Elements of Antibiotic Stewardship for hospitals in 2014, nursing homes in 2015, and more recently outpatients in The core elements provides a framework for antibiotic stewardship for clinicians and facilities that routinely provide antibiotic treatment.
6
Prevalence of Antimicrobial Use in Acute Care Hospitals in U.S
One-day prevalence surveys were conducted in acute care hospitals in 10 states, 183 hospitals between May and September Patients were randomly selected from each hospital’s morning census on the survey date. 51% of hospital were small. 11, 282 patients were reviewed and 5,860 met criteria for évaluation. Magill SS, et al. JAMA 2014;312(14): ;
7
Extent of Inappropriate or Unnecessary Antibiotic Use
5 center prospective study of post-prescription review Cosgrove SE, et al. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2012;33:374-80
8
Reasons for Inappropriate or Unnecessary Antibiotic Use
Reasons for recommending modified regimens (59%) Organism not susceptible 9% More appropriate agent 31% Patient can take oral therapy 5% Overlapping agents 15% Reasons for recommending stopping antibiotics (41%) Antibiotics not needed 28% Inappropriate prophylaxis 13% Cosgrove SE, et al. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2012;33:374-80
9
Prescriber’s Perceptions and Knowledge
Single center survey of faculty and medical residents 94% agreed that antibiotics are overused nationally and 74% locally 62% agreed that doctors overprescribe antibiotics 13% agreed that they themselves overprescribe Most would like more education about antibiotics and feedback about their antibiotic selection Majority did not think antimicrobial stewardship programs are an obstacle to good patient care Abbo L, et al. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2011;32(7):
10
Causes Adverse Drug Events (ADE) in Hospitalized Patients
Data from 32 states Antibiotics and anti-infectives were most common cause of ADE 23% present on admission 28% originated during hospital stay C. difficile was the most common antibiotic-associated ADE This is data from 2011, reported from 32 states participating in the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP). All numbers noted in the text and included in the tables are actual values, not estimates, because the data include a census of discharges rather than a sample of discharges. Weiss AJ, et al. Statistical Brief #158, Jul 2013:
11
Antibiotic-Associated Adverse Events (ADE)
Retrospective chart review, single center (n=1488) 20% of patients experienced at least 1 ADE 97% considered clinically significant 27% resulting in prolonged hospitalization or ED/clinic visits Gastrointestinal (42%), renal (24%), hematologic (15%) 20% of ADEs were attributable to antibiotics that were not indicated 73% occurred during hospitalization 4% developed CDI within 90-days of antibiotic initiation 6% developed an infection with a new MDRO within 90-days of antibiotic initiation 3% -prolonged hospitalization; 24%, additional clinic or emergency department visit; 9%, and additional laboratory tests, electrocardiograms, or imaging 61% Tamma PD, et al. JAMA Intern Med 2017;177(9):
12
Antibiotics Cause Prolonged Alterations to Gut Flora
2 years! Green: susceptible bugs Purple: resistant bugs Jernberg C, et al. Microbiology. 2010;156:
13
Antibiotic Consumption and Resistance
Urinary Tract Bacteria Costelloe C, et al. BMJ. 2010;340
14
Antimicrobial Stewardship Challenges with New Antibiotics
Agent Year FDA Indication Desired Indication Cost/day AWP Fidaxomicin 2011 CDAD $441 Ceftaroline ABSSSI, CABP MRSA bacteremia, endocarditis, osteomyelitis $ Tedizolid 2014 ABSSSI, VRE bacteremia, MRSA PNA $ Ceftolozane/ tazobactam cIAI, cUTIs, Pylo MDR pseudomonas PNA, bacteremia $ Dalbavancin ABSSSI MRSA bacteremia/ osteomyelitis, endocarditis $5,523-course Oritavancin $3,480-course Ceftazidime/ avibactam 2015 CRE bacteremia, PNA $1,179 Meropenem/ vaborbactam 2017 cUTIs, Pylo $1,188 complicated urinary tract infections (cUTI) including pyelonephritis caused by designated susceptible bacteria SIVEXTRO is an oxazolidinone-class antibacterial drug indicated in adults for the treatment of acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections (ABSSSI) caused by designated susceptible bacteria. ( Complicated Intra-abdominal Infections (cIAI), Complicated Urinary Tract Infections (cUTI), acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections (ABSSSI), .C. difficile-associated diarrhea (CDAD)
15
Benefits of Antimicrobial Stewardship Programs
16
Stewardship Influences Antibiotic Prescribing Practices
Cochrane systematic review of 29 RCTs found: Evidence that interventions lead to more patients receiving appropriate treatment Increase in compliance with guidelines/policies by 15% Interventions reduced duration of antibiotics by 2 days Moderate-certainty evidence that interventions reduce length of stay without increasing risk of death LOS decreased by 1.12 days The risk of death was 11% in both the intervention and control Very low-certainty evidence about the effect of the interventions on reducing C. difficile infections, resistant Gram-negative and Gram-positive organisms Majority of studies were from north America and Europe. Interventions: ”restrictive” and “enablement” techniques. This represents an increase from 43% to 58% which is pretty low. Davey P, et al. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2017;2:CD003543
17
Stewardship Improves Patient Outcomes
Meta-analysis of 142 studies assessed the effect of AS objectives on patient outcomes (clinical outcomes, adverse effects, costs, bacterial resistance rates) AS objectives Impact on patient outcomes Guidelines adherence RRR for mortality was 35% (p<0.0001) Decrease in LOS, decreased costs Therapy de-escalation RRR for mortality was 56% (p<0.0001) Therapeutic drug monitoring RRR for the rate of nephrotoxicity was 50% (p=0.02) Bedside consultation RRR for mortality for S. aureus bacteremia was 66% (p=0.008) Quality of evidence is generally low and heterogeneity between studies is low to moderate. Mortality had moderate heterogenicity RRR- relative risk reduction RRR- relative risk reduction, LOS-length of hospital stay Schuts EC, et al. Lancet Infect Dis 2016;16:847-56
18
Stewardship Reduces Resistance
Meta-analysis of 32 studies from 20 countries showed that stewardship interventions were associated with: 51% reduction of MDR GNR infection/colonization 48% reduction of ESBL-producing organisms 37% reduction of MRSA infection/colonization 32% reduction of C. difficile infections No reductions of VRE No reductions in aminoglycosides or fluoroquinolone-resistant GNR Baur D, et al. Lancet Infect Dis. 2017;17(9):
19
Subgroup Analyses Baur D, et al. Lancet Infect Dis. 2017;17(9):
20
Stewardship Reduces C. difficile Infections
National AS intervention was implemented in Scotland Focused on reduction in use of 4C antibiotics: Fluoroquinolones 3rd generation cephalosporins Clindamycin Amoxicillin/clavulanate Other infection control and prevention strategies were also implemented (e.g. hand hygiene) Use of 4C was reduced by 59% in hospitals and community during the stewardship interventions Promotion of empiric guidelines recommending against the use of 4C antibiotics: FQ, clinda, cephalosporins, and amox-clav Required approval to use 4C agents from a microbiologist or ID physician if not used for approved indications Susceptibilities not provided in micro reports Root cause analysis for all episodes of CDI Proton pump inhibitor use guidelines 2010- Substitute antibiotics: amoxicillin, piperacillin/tazobactam, aminoglycosides, trimethoprim/sulfmethoxazole Lawes T, et al. Lancet Infect Dis. 2017;17:
21
Stewardship Reduces C. difficile Infections
CDI prevalence density decreased by 68% in hospitals and 45% in community Graphs represent c. diff prevalence density Dotted line indicates the start of the AS intervention Lawes T, et al. Lancet Infect Dis. 2017;17:
22
Stewardship Decreases Costs
Standiford HC, et al. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2012; 33:338.
23
Audience Question #1 Which of following are true about rationale for antimicrobial stewardship program implementation? A. Joint Commission Standard requires it 20-50% of antibiotic prescriptions in acute care hospitals are unnecessary or inappropriate An increase in antibiotic consumption is associated with an increase in antibiotic resistance All of the above
24
Audience Question #2 Antimicrobial Stewardship Programs can (select all correct answers): A. Limit or decrease antibiotic resistance B. Decrease hospital mortality C. Optimize antimicrobial therapy and safety D. Reduce or control the costs
25
Summary Multidisciplinary stewardship programs should be implemented across all healthcare settings There is an association between antibiotic consumption and resistance development Antimicrobial stewardship interventions can improve antibiotic use, decrease duration of therapy and decrease costs Antimicrobial stewardship is an effective approach for controlling antibiotic resistance and CDI New antibiotics will need to be matched with effective antimicrobial stewardship to extend their lives
Similar presentations
© 2024 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.