Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Water Quality Programs – OAWP’s Role

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Water Quality Programs – OAWP’s Role"— Presentation transcript:

1 Water Quality Programs – OAWP’s Role
Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services (FDACS) Office of Agricultural Water Policy

2 Office of Agricultural Water Policy
Develops/Implements Best Management Practices (BMPs) Economically and technically feasible Address both water quality and water conservation Research conducted to validate effectiveness Some BMPs eligible for cost share. Coordinates with WMDs on Water Supply Planning Provides data and modeling input for water demand projections Serves on regional water planning committees Coordinates with FDEP on BMAPs, TMDLs Reviews data on agricultural land use Reviews nutrient load allocations Works with FDEP to achieve BMAP goals Work cooperatively with: Agricultural producers and industry groups FDEP SUS Five WMDS Other stakeholders Established in 1995 Lead for water quantity and water quality issues involving agriculture 50 FTES

3 Water Quality Protection
(7) (c) 2. The Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services may develop and adopt by rule pursuant to ss (1) and suitable interim measures, best management practices, or other measures necessary to achieve the level of pollution reduction established by the department for agricultural pollutant sources in allocations developed pursuant to subsection (6) and this subsection or for programs implemented pursuant to paragraph (12)(b). These practices and measures may be implemented by those parties responsible for agricultural pollutant sources and the department, the water management districts, and the Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services shall assist with implementation. In the process of developing and adopting rules for interim measures, best management practices, or other measures, the Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services shall consult with the department, the Department of Health, the water management districts, representatives from affected farming groups, and environmental group representatives. Such rules must also incorporate provisions for a notice of intent to implement the practices and a system to assure the implementation of the practices, including site inspection and recordkeeping requirements. -Are there other objectives that should be considered during the development of the revised IA Program?

4 Agricultural BMP Overview
Practical measures that use water more efficiently and reduce potential effects of fertilizers, pesticides, and animal waste on water resources; must be economically and technically feasible for producers to implement BMPs developed in collaboration with agricultural industry, agencies, non-governmental organizations, and others; verified effective by DEP; adopted by rule; subject to periodic review and update Supported by cost-share programs from FDACS and others Implementation secures a presumption of compliance with state water quality standards

5 Statewide BMP Enrollment
9 BMP Manuals Over 10,00 ag enrollments covering over 50% of ag land 40,000+ Discrete Parcels

6 Best Management Practices Manuals
Adoption Rule Reference Next Review Cow/Calf UNDER REVIEW 2009 5M-11 2016 Sod UNDER REVIEW 2008 5M-9 Specialty Fruit & Nut 2011 5M-13 2017 Equine 2012 5M-14 Citrus 2013 5M-16 2018 Nursery 2014 5M-6 Vegetable & Agronomic Crops 2015 5M-8 2020 Dairies 5M-17 2021 Poultry 5M-19 Small Farms IN DEVELOPMENT

7 BMP Program Funding Levels
Cost-Share Research $ (millions) Contracts $(millions) FY $16.5 19 $1.4 17 FY $21.8 21 $1.9 FY  $28.0 23   $1.5 14 FY $14.0 23 $2.5 TBD

8 BMPs and BMAPs Basin Management Action Plan (BMAP)
Restoration plan to meet water-quality goal. 26 adopted statewide. DEP adopts by Secretarial Order Establishes requirement to implement BMPs or demonstrate compliance through monitoring

9 Agriculture’s Role in Water Quality Protection
Florida Legislature provided for agricultural operations to implement BMPs as preferred means to help meet TMDLs and protect water quality. Operations within adopted BMAP areas and/or Northern Everglades have two options: Enroll in and implement Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services (FDACS) best management practices (BMPs). Follow a Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP)- or water management district approved water quality monitoring plan at operator’s own expense.

10 Agriculture’s Role in Water Quality Protection
Agricultural producers are only obligated to implement existing BMPs adopted by FDACS in rule Achievement of further reductions must be either – Through projects/iniatitives identified in the BMAP These will have to be funded For ag producers are not mandatory Adoption of revised BMPs adopted by rule by FDACS

11 BMAP Goals Year-5 Goals 30% Reductions Year-10 Goals 80% Reductions
Year 20 —TMDL Achievement 100% BMP enrollment and implementation Projects to address anticipated gap to meet TMDL Projects to address remaining gap to meet TMDL

12 Reduction in N Input Soil Moisture Probes 694 $3,500 26 1,246,318
Potential Units Cost per Unit Potential N Reduction per Unit (lbs) Total Reduction in N (lbs) Total Cost Cost per Pound of N Reduction Reduction in N Input Soil Moisture Probes 694 $3,500 26 1,246,318 $2,427,250 $1.95 Description: number of probes $/probe system lbs/acre lbs Deployment, training, technical support, and use of soil moisture probes to manage irrigation sytems. Assumptions: 20% Reduction in N input Reduction in N inputs presumed from improvements in use efficency and management of inputs to row crops due to effective and efficient use of soil moisture probes. Cost includes probes, computer peripherals, and minimum three years of technical support. The number of probe installations is approximately 50% of the estimated number of irrigation systems in the Suwannee BMAP area, excluding most nurseries and ornamentals.

13 Reduction in N Load Precision Irrigation 88,940 $446 2 162,512
Potential Units Cost per Unit Potential N Reduction per Unit (lbs) Total Reduction in N (lbs) Total Cost Cost per Pound of N Reduction Reduction in N Load Precision Irrigation 88,940 $446 2 162,512 $39,667,270 $244.09 Description: acres $/acre lbs/acre lbs Deployment of equipment, procedures, and training to improve location, volume, and timing of irrigation to match crop needs more precisely. Assumptions: 10% Reduction in N load Cost is one-time capital expenditure. Reduction presumes that precision management of irrigation will reduce overwatering that can flush nutrients past the root zone. All irrigation systems considered in this calculation are existing lateral move and center pivot systems being retrofitted with a Variable Rate Irrigation (VRI) state of the art system, and traveling gun systems being replaced with lateral move or center pivot VRI systems; VRI system paid up front with no loans or cost share, and are the highest of the range of costs provided by vendors. Useful life of VRI system likely beyond 5 years, would continue to accrue benefits for 10 to 15 years.

14 Reduction in N Input Cover Crops 87,208 $45 45 3,924,374 $3,924,374.43
Potential Units Cost per Unit Potential N Reduction per Unit (lbs) Total Reduction in N (lbs) Total Cost Cost per Pound of N Reduction Reduction in N Input Cover Crops 87,208 $45 45 3,924,374 $3,924,374.43 $1.00 Description: acres $/acre lbs/acre lbs Planting of cover crops in between production cycles to increase soil organic content, improve nutrient retention, and reduce erosion. Assumptions: Used acreages for vegetable and agronomic crops for all cropping systems, regardless of irrigation type. Per USDA-ARS, range of cover crop seed prices are $30.00 to $77.40 per acre. Average price for rye, ryegrass and vetch was $45.00 per acre. Per Wagger and Mengel, 1988, these three cover crop treatments can assimilate between 10 to 90 lbs/acre, average 45 lbs/acre of residual N.

15 Irma Response Evaluating impacts on current cost share agreement (CSA) projects – repairs, modifications Determining which CSAs may be put on hold or discontinued Determining extent to which water control and conservation structures have been damaged Developing procedure for assisting with FSA Emergency Conservation Program – restoring conservation structures (e.g. risers,culverts).

16 Thank You!


Download ppt "Water Quality Programs – OAWP’s Role"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google