Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byShannon Giddings Modified over 10 years ago
1
An Accurate Assessment of the Situation Determining a Communitys Wastewater Needs Nick Haig- University of Minnesota Onsite Sewage Treatment Program haigx003@umn.eduhaigx003@umn.edu - 612-625-9797
2
What is a site assessment? Analyze records Determine lot size Locate well Probe existing system Conduct soil boring Match soils Determine seasonal water table depth Locate potential drainfield area Identify treatment options Check/pump septic tank
3
Inspection: Results 1.Certificate of compliance 2.Certificate of non-compliance 3.I mminent Threat to Public Health System (ITPHS) Local policies affect results and homeowner requirements! BUYER BEWARE!
4
What about a whole community?
5
MPCA Unsewered Area Alternative Analysis 1.Replace failed ISTS with new ISTS. 2.Decentralized cluster system. 3.Connect to existing facility. 4.Connect to a facility, which requires an expansion. 5.Construct a new wastewater and treatment facility. Note: Solution may be a combination of approaches
6
Determining Decentralized Feasibility Typical assessment: Complying & Non-complying More complete assessment: Complying & Could be Complying & Cant be Complying
7
ComplyDont Comply Minnesota Lake Typical Assessment
8
ComplyCant Comply Could Comply Minnesota Lake More Complete Assessment
9
Doing the more complete assessment Map of parcels Records: –Permits –Age of systems –Maintenance Identify: –Likely compliant –Spot check Properties to be checked: –No records –Possible un-permitted work –Older than XX years –Suspected problems Map of findings
10
Septic System Components Source TankDrainfield Treatment in Soil Groundwater Well 3 feet
11
Site Assessments: Soil Analysis
12
Inadequate Vertical Separation Source TankDrainfield Inadequate Treatment Groundwater Well 3 feet PathogensNutrients
13
Mound System Source Tank Treatment in Soil Groundwater Well 3 feet Pump Mound Treatment Area
14
What Kind of System is Bad (failing)? Leaky Tanks Surfacing to Ground Inadequate Vertical Separation to Water Table Direct Discharge
15
Drywells or Cesspools
16
Surfacing to the ground
18
Direct Discharge (to surface, tile line, or body of water)
20
Veseli Examined the records Conducted 62 Site Evaluations Determined the current status of systems Assessed potential solutions for each property Evaluated potential cluster sites Produced map of findings County cost for time, travel, reporting and some overhead - $76.90/site
21
Results
22
Possible Results In Compliance- Meets current Rice Co. Ordinance Not In Compliance- Does not meet current Rice County Ordinance, may need to be upgraded in the future Imminent Threat to Public Health System- ground surface or surface water discharge, sewage backup into dwelling, drywell or cesspool.
23
Results 60 Anticipated Site Evaluations 62 Final Site Evaluations About 60% of community needed to be inspected because of: No records Unpermitted work Suspected direct discharges Several homes have been upgraded since 1992 due to Rice County Septic Ordinance property transfer requirements
24
Actual Results
25
Public Health Threats- Stacked Up
26
Veseli- Overall Septic Situation 106 Buildings
27
Veseli- Overall Septic Compliance
28
Community Options (in no particular order) Regionalize to Lonsdale (2002 est. = $30,000) One decentralized collection/treatment system for entire community Several cluster collection/treatment systems for entire community Upgrade all non-compliant systems with ISTS and cluster those that cannot fit ISTS
29
Options (cont.) Upgrade systems that pose ITPH with ISTS and cluster where necessary Allow new developments but require them to provide wastewater treatment for existing lots currently not in compliance
30
Site Evaluation Conclusions
31
Site Evaluation Cost Estimates Rice County WW Initiative Total Field Work$1925$1160$3085 Reporting$240$312$552 Overhead$408$270$678 Mileage$198$180$378 Meals$0$75 Total$2771$1997 $4768* * $76.90/ Site Evaluation
32
Beaver Lake Individual standard system Individual other system or a holding tank Individual holding tank Cluster system
33
Costs- Beaver Lake $500 to local ISTS professional In Kind not counted $3000-$5000 estimated
34
Meriden
35
More complete assessment Offers a complete understanding of the current situation Basis to look at potential solutions Helps determine appropriate boundaries Fits with the funding hierarchy changes
Similar presentations
© 2024 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.