Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byFanny Dharmawijaya Modified over 6 years ago
1
Bill Dorotinsky, PREM public sector governance group
Public Expenditure and Financial Management Overview of Issues and Approaches Bill Dorotinsky, PREM public sector governance group PEAM Course May 2, 2006
2
Outline Framework for Review Approaches to PEM review Common Problems
Budget Cycle Formulation Execution PFM System PFM Functions Outcomes/Impact Common Problems Common Solutions Measuring PFM Systems
3
Three Objectives of Public Expenditure Management Systems
Framework Three Objectives of Public Expenditure Management Systems Macrofiscal discipline and stability Support economic growth and stability (and reduce poverty) Avoid public finance crises Strategic allocation of resources Match government policy with programs, objectives And assure social safety nets, and promote growth Technical efficiency Getting the most from each zloty spent And just delivering core services
4
Basic principles of PEM
Framework Basic principles of PEM Comprehensiveness include all revenue and expenditure, all agencies Accuracy record actual transactions and flows Annuality cover a defined period of time (e.g. one year budget, multi-year forecasts) Authoritativeness only spend as authorized by law Transparency information on spending is public, timely, understandable
5
What institutions to review?
Formal and Informal Rules Laws and regulations Constitutions , fiscal, budget, procurement, civil service, special funds, sector laws, public enterprises, mandatory spending Process Policy Planning Financial/resource management Organizations and their roles Information
6
Approaches to PEM Review
Cycle, Process System broad scope organizations Functions/tasks Outcomes/Impact
7
Expenditure Management Cycle
Planning system Medium term plans, e.g. three year rolling plans Annual budgets Development, recurrent and revenue Fund release procedure, e.g... warranting Accounting for revenue and expenditure Public expenditure review Institutions Reports and financial statements Audit system Project monitoring Project appraisal Resource allocation Liquidity management Expenditure control Monitoring & controlling Post event Accountability Financial management system boundaries Formulation covers ‘expenditure review’ insofar as this is a step in preparation of future plans, and goes through to “annual budgets..” -- need for good budget -- Brazil roads, congress, MoF -- linking budget to cash management -- dc grants management Execution covers from ‘liquidity management’ through to PER’s, insofar as PER’s are part of the ex poste accountability system. Half of cycle (2) Hardware and software do not solve problems in human systems. Must know source of problem, and seriously assess whether computerization will solve the core problem. (DC Example) Underlying all of this is good recording of transactions and reporting! Source: Adapted from Integrated Financial Management. Michael Parry, International Management Consultants Limited. Training Workshop on Government Budgeting in Developing Countries. THE UNITED NATIONS. December 1997.
8
Budget Formulation Issues are typically about Process
Quality of Engagement
9
Process Issues “Due process” Coherence Civil society participation
Fair hearing for proposals, requests within government Coherence Budget process is planning process Planning within resource constraints Indicative ceilings for budget offered early in the process ‘hard budget constraint’ Changing incentives Comprehensiveness Capital, all revenues and expenses Civil society participation ‘decentralized’ impact analysis Legislative stage In executive via white papers
10
Process (continued) Proper decision sequence for coherent process
Macrofiscal, revenues, expenditures Sectoral Administrative/program/project Accountability: Link resources with management responsibility Schedule Budget calendar issued Sufficient time for sound proposals Ministries Budget office analysis Legislative review Two stage process
11
Quality Issues (improving process outcome)
Multi-year perspective Setting multi-year policy objectives Conservative economic, revenue forecast Likely versus ‘hoped for’ Benchmarked against non-governmental forecasts Realistic expenditure forecast Provision for recurring ‘unanticipated’ events Contingency reserves – with clear rules for use Indicative ceilings linked to second-year of prior budget forecast (policy) Requests reconciled to prior year actuals, current year estimates Two aggregate forecasts (advanced) Proposed policy Current services/policy Capital and recurrent
12
Quality (continued) Budget ownership
Early, frequent engagement of policy officials on structured decisions Fiscal policy paper to kick-off process Distinguish policy from recurrent revenue Proposed revenue sources versus historical trends No spending allowed against proposed unless they materialize (grants, tax revenue) Communication Clear signals of direction, markets and agencies Prepare public for change – sustainable adjustment
13
Quality (continued) Budget Information Decision papers
Prior year actual, current year estimate, budget year +2, Staffing, Outputs Classification: economic, administrative, functional, program Requests distinguish between on-going, new spending; mandatory, discretionary Decision papers Basis for Minister of Finance, Gov’t decision Pulls together academic, audit, performance, evaluation of prior years financial performance, other information
14
Why is budget execution important?
Credibility of the Honduran Budget – In-year Deviations by Agency (percent of the executed over the approved budget) Matching Plan to Implementation Good Macrofiscal But, look at sectoral allocations. Who gets harmed? 3-level framework Cash, accrual, commitment
15
What is budget execution?
Processes and institutions to implement the budget Incentives – principle-agent problem Reflects that budget is NOT only an accounting document also a political document Planning/steering device
16
Objectives of budget execution
Manage Spending and Revenues to budget support choices of elected officials allow budget to be planning and steering tool promote macrofiscal discipline Reduce opportunities for corruption Enable program implementation Assure resources flow to programs allow budget to be aid to operational efficiency through spending unit advance planning, efficient administration enable program managers to achieve objective governance
17
General Phases of Execution
Phase 1: Allocation Phase 2: Ministry Spending Plans link actions with finances; cash flow needs Phase 3: Commitments Phase 4: Verification Phase 5: Liquidation of Financial Obligation
18
Phases of Execution Source: Integrated Financial Management. Michael Parry, International Management Consultants Limited. Training Workshop on Government Budgeting in Developing Countries. THE UNITED NATIONS. December 1997.
19
Budget and Policy Execution System in Hungary (1999)
20
Public Finance Functions
Core Functions Budget Execution Macroeconomic Forecasting Budget Formulation Fiscal Policy Revenue Administration Debt Management Treasury Procurement Policy Internal Audit Non-core Functions Lottery & Gambling Financial Asset Management Financial Market Regulation Financial Investigations Procurement Administration
21
Core Tasks and Organizations
- Macroforecasting Fiscal Policy Revenue administration Debt Management - internal control - program management - spending (commitments) - recording & reporting - payment orders - verification of receipt of goods/services - program/cash plans Financial Management is Everyone’s Responsibility
22
Common PEM problems Weak links between planning, policy, resource limits, and budgets failure to achieve strategic objectives abstract planning, unrelated to ways and means Annual focus leads to suboptimal choices Digging a hole; inability to climb out Complacency today, unaware of crisis tomorrow Separation between capital and recurrent budgets Lower than expected returns to capital Non-comprehensive budget Using other means to support favored programs Revenues not captured in budget Taking piecemeal decisions without reference to over-all effect Funds don’t reach intended beneficiaries Budget executed differently than approved Goods and services not delivered as planned Trying to solve conflict of goals, objectives through direct control rather than dialogue, consensus --- exacerbates the principle agent problem, rather than addressing it head-on and resolving. Labor productivity: span of control;
23
Common Reforms MTEF Treasury Performance Budgeting ‘Fragmentation’
IFMIS Performance Budgeting ‘Fragmentation’ Procurement, Debt New Public Management Deconcentration, decentralization Administrative & Civil Service
24
Measuring PFM Systems Field of PFM has evolved recently, moving towards more assessment standardization New set of PFM indicators to monitor quality of PFM system at high-level See Recommended with approach to working with countries Country-led reform agenda Donor coordination around agenda Shared information pool – common PEFA framework
25
PFM PEFA Indicators Cross-cutting Indicators
Transparency of taxpayer obligations and liabilities Effectiveness of taxpayer registration and assessment Effectiveness of tax collection Predictability of funds for commitment Recording/management of cash, debt and guarantees Effectiveness of payroll controls Competition, value for money and controls in procurement Effectiveness of internal controls Effectiveness of internal audit Orderliness in annual budget process Multi-year perspective Accounts reconciliation Resources received by service delivery units Quality and timeliness of in-year budget reports Quality and timeliness of annual financial statements External audit Legislative scrutiny of budget Legislative scrutiny of external audit reports Cross-cutting Indicators Aggregate expenditure out-turn Composition of expenditure out-turn Aggregate revenue out-turn payment arrears Classification of the budget Comprehensiveness of information unreported government operations Transparency of inter-governmental fiscal relations Oversight of aggregate fiscal risk Public access to key fiscal information
26
General References SIGMA Policy Brief No. 1: Anatomy of the Expenditure Budget (1997) OECD Managing Government Expenditure. Schiavo-Compo and Tommasi. Asian Development Bank. 1999 Government Budgeting and Expenditure Controls, Theory and Practice. Premchand. IMF. 1993 Public Expenditure Management. IMF Treasury Reference Model (Bank PE website) A Contemporary Approach to Public Expenditure Management. Schick, Allen. World Bank Institute Public Expenditure Handbook. World Bank, 1998. Managing Public Expenditure: A Reference Book for Transition Countries. Richard Allen and Daniel Tommasi, Eds. OECD. Paris, 2001. Public Financial Management Performance Measurement Framework. PEFA. Washington, D.C. June 2005. See for PEFA Performance Measurement Framework
27
Application: Rules and Incentives
Budget Impasse Executive-legislative relations What rules might govern a budget impasse? How might they effect incentives between the legislature and executive? What might be important considerations for designing a rule?
28
Rules and Outcomes Application
Source: World Bank – OECD budget procedures database at
29
Dominican Republic Budget Deviation, 1996-2000
Application Informal Rules Dominican Republic Budget Deviation, Identifying sources of weakness for further investigation Identifying incentives at work Source: Dominican Republic PER 2003, background data
30
Budget Deviation (ratio of executed to approved budget)
Application Dominican Republic Budget Deviation (ratio of executed to approved budget) Identifying trends for transparency Source: Dominican Republic PER 2003, background data
31
Exploring problems Above-the-waterline observation WHY? WHY? WHY?
100 clinics, but only 70 operating WHY? Budget not comprehensive Budget fragmented Cash triage 10 built with donor funds, donor funds off-budget 10 built with domestic funds, capital budget separate 10 funded in budget, but no cash allocated to operate WHY? Weak budget law Too rigid budget execution Low public pay WHY? Donor ring-fencing for “accountability” Line ministry gets flexible resource pool Local staff seek higher PIU pay And what can be done about it?
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.