Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byCurtis Dorsey Modified over 6 years ago
1
Acute HIV Infection and PrEP: Opportunities and challenges
Meg Doherty MD MPH PhD WHO HQ Acute HIV Infection Symposium, IAS 2018 Conference, Amsterdam, Netherlands 23 July June 2018
2
Testing for acute HIV infection while taking PrEP
3
Testing in the context of PrEP
People who start PrEP need to have received a negative HIV test result, and then offered testing every 3 months while they continue on PrEP to make sure that they have not acquired HIV. WHO advises testing using the most sensitive tests (as per national testing strategy) for the A1 test – usually a 3rd generation test. Reports of delays in antibody response in people who have seroconverted while on PrEP (due to poor adherence to the prescribed regime) when 2nd generation oral fluid tests have been used for follow up monitoring. Oral fluid tests are not advised for PrEP monitoring.
4
Possible Ways to Screen for Acute Infection in PrEP Programs
When Starting or Restarting PrEP Symptoms of acute viral syndrome HIV Ag assays HIV nucleic acid testing During Follow-up Verify effective use If non-adherent, test as if restarting PrEP
5
Clinical Screening for Acute Viral Syndromes and Acute HIV infection in iPrEx OLE
No HIV Acute HIV No Sx 1573 Sx 28 2 30 1601 1603 Eligible for PrEP N=1603 Deferred PrEP due to Acute Viral Syndrome N=30 (1.9%) Sensitivity = 100% Specificity = 98% PPV = 6.7% NPV = 100% Acute HIV infections N=2 (6.7%) HIV RNA negative N=28 (93.3%) Delayed Start on PrEP N=25 (83.3%) Never started PrEP N=3 (6.7%) Grant et al, Lancet ID, 2014.
6
4th generation assays and NAT technologies?
The risk of acute infection in people who seek PrEP services is expected to range between 1:50 and 1:300 at baseline depending on the underlying HIV incidence in the population. Early detection of HIV, NAT can help identify acute infection, allows earlier diagnosis and linkage to ART, ↓risk of developing HIVDR from starting PrEP while acutely infected. Because of this risk and where feasible, there may be benefits to using assays that have the ability to detect HIV earlier, such as 4th generation serology assays that detect HIV-1/2 antibodies and HIV p24 antigen, and NAT technologies, for HIV testing prior to starting or restarting PrEP.
Similar presentations
© 2024 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.