Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byGilbert Henderson Modified over 6 years ago
1
Dennis Thompson Theories of Legislative Ethics
Minimalist Functionalist Rationalist
2
Minimalist Theories “Ask the minimum” of legislators, tell them
what behavior to avoid, not what behavior to aspire to Focus on avoiding financial conflicts of interest
3
Functionalist Theories
Focus on the function or role of the legislator, how the legislator should act in relation to his or her constituents Delegate Trustee
4
Rationalist/Maximalist Theories of Ethics
Urge legislators to follow broad principles JOHN RAWLS Veil of ignorance UTILITARIANISM (John S. Mill) LIBERTARIANISM (R. Nozick, M. Friedman) COMMUNITARIANISM
5
Criticisms of These Theories
Thompson criticizes all 3 types of theories of legislative ethics (minimalist, functionalist and rationalist)
6
Thompson’s alternative (he says better) view of legislative ethics
Autonomy Fairness Generality Publicity
7
Individual v. Political Ethics
Thompson: Different in origin, function and content Though similarities…. HOW ARE LEGISLATORS DIFFERENT FROM ORDINARY CITIZENS?
8
Corruption – some definitions
Personal gain Perquisites of office Individual corruption (involves personal, usually financial gain – classic example is bribery) Institutional corruption (involves political gain, or abuse of political process)
9
Individual v. Institutional Corruption
Sen. Dave Durenberger (individual corruption) Keating 5 (institutional corruption) Speaker of the House James Wright (individual and institutional corruption)
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.