Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

AMS analysis of aerosol composition from FLAME experiments: Chemically speciated mass loadings J. H. Kroll, T. B. Onasch, A. Trimborn Aerodyne Research,

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "AMS analysis of aerosol composition from FLAME experiments: Chemically speciated mass loadings J. H. Kroll, T. B. Onasch, A. Trimborn Aerodyne Research,"— Presentation transcript:

1 AMS analysis of aerosol composition from FLAME experiments: Chemically speciated mass loadings J. H. Kroll, T. B. Onasch, A. Trimborn Aerodyne Research, Inc. J. A. Huffman, I. Ulbrich, J. L. Jimenez University of Colorado

2 About the data 1) The AMS quantitatively measures non-refractory aerosol components (compounds which evaporate rapidly at C); this includes all organics as well as most ammonium compounds. However, in many of the burns, significant concentrations of K+ and Cl- (and sometimes Na+) are detected in the “closed” mode. This indicates the presence of refractory inorganics (such as KCl and NaCl); thus the stated concentrations of inorganics should be considered as lower limits. [In many of the burns, negligible levels of inorganics were detected, in both “open” and “closed” modes, so the contributions of inorganic ions is negligible.] 2) The mass concentrations given are relative values; at present they are not collection efficiency-corrected. BC measurements, combined with our SPMS data, will allow for such a correction (and possibly for a correction for the refractory compounds, described above). 3) Aerosol components were quantified by analyzing the high-resolution data; thus “oxygenated” (CxHyOz) and “not oxygenated” (CxHy) organics can be distinguished, and are tabulated separately. 4) Background aerosol was generally negligible; in cases where it was >5% of average loading during the burn (Burns 4, 8, 9, 10, and 12) it was subtracted out (though changes are insubstantial).

3 Overview: all burns All values presented (here and in subsequent slides): - are in mg/m3 - are the average for the entire burn (2-3 hours); changes in relative mass loadings were relatively minor (though this will be quantified soon)

4 Burn A/1: Ponderosa Pine
Missing CxHy value

5 Burn B/2: SoCal chamise CxHy 4.6 CxHyOz 3.5 total organic 8.1 NO3 0.2
NO3 0.2 SO4 1.8 NH4 0.0 Cl 0.8 K total inorganic 3.6 TOTAL 11.8

6 Burn C/3: Ponderosa pine needles

7 Burn D/4: SoCal chamise (same as B)

8 Burn E/5: Rice straw

9 Burn F/6: Ponderosa pine duff

10 Burn G/7: Alaska tundra core duff

11 Burn H/8: SoCal manzanita

12 Burn I/9: Utah juniper foliage, sticks

13 Burn J/10: Utah sage, rabbitbrush

14 Burn K/11: Lignin

15 Burn L/12: lodgepole pine

16 Burn M/13: Puerto Rican Fern

17 Burn N: SoCal chamise No EI spectra

18 Burn O/15: Southern wax myrtle

19 Burn P/16: Southern pine needles

20 Burn Q/17: Puerto Rican Sticks

21 Burn R/18: Southeastern palmetto leaves

22 Burn S/19: Ceanothus


Download ppt "AMS analysis of aerosol composition from FLAME experiments: Chemically speciated mass loadings J. H. Kroll, T. B. Onasch, A. Trimborn Aerodyne Research,"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google