Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byHenry Nichols Modified over 6 years ago
1
Anti–Programmed Cell Death (PD)-1 Immunotherapy for Malignant Tumor: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Ran Chen, Pei-Chun Peng, Bin Wen, Fu-Ying Li, Sheng Xie, Guozhong Chen, Jiefu Lu, Zhuoyu Peng, Shao-Bo Tang, Yu-Mei Liang, Xin Deng Translational Oncology Volume 9, Issue 1, Pages (February 2016) DOI: /j.tranon Copyright © 2016 The Authors Terms and Conditions
2
Figure 1 Flowchart representing the systematic identification of studies. Translational Oncology 2016 9, 32-40DOI: ( /j.tranon ) Copyright © 2016 The Authors Terms and Conditions
3
Figure 2 Assessment of risk bias.
Translational Oncology 2016 9, 32-40DOI: ( /j.tranon ) Copyright © 2016 The Authors Terms and Conditions
4
Figure 3 Forest plot depicting the overall response rate of nivolumab compared with chemotherapy. Translational Oncology 2016 9, 32-40DOI: ( /j.tranon ) Copyright © 2016 The Authors Terms and Conditions
5
Figure 4 Forest plot depicting the comparison of adverse events associated with nivolumab and chemotherapy. Translational Oncology 2016 9, 32-40DOI: ( /j.tranon ) Copyright © 2016 The Authors Terms and Conditions
6
Figure 5 Forest plot depicting the 1-year OS rates of nivolumab and dacarbazine. Translational Oncology 2016 9, 32-40DOI: ( /j.tranon ) Copyright © 2016 The Authors Terms and Conditions
7
Figure 6 Forest plot depicting the PFS rates associated with nivolumab and dacarbazine. Translational Oncology 2016 9, 32-40DOI: ( /j.tranon ) Copyright © 2016 The Authors Terms and Conditions
8
Figure 7 Forest plot depicting the objective response rates associated with nivolumab and dacarbazine. Translational Oncology 2016 9, 32-40DOI: ( /j.tranon ) Copyright © 2016 The Authors Terms and Conditions
9
Figure 8 Forest plot depicting the comparison of adverse events associated with nivolumab and dacarbazine. Translational Oncology 2016 9, 32-40DOI: ( /j.tranon ) Copyright © 2016 The Authors Terms and Conditions
10
Figure 9 Forest plot depicting the overall response rate with different doses (2 and 10 mg/kg) of pembrolizumab. Translational Oncology 2016 9, 32-40DOI: ( /j.tranon ) Copyright © 2016 The Authors Terms and Conditions
11
Figure 10 Forest plot depicting the PFS rates associated with different doses (2 and 10 mg/kg) of pembrolizumab. Translational Oncology 2016 9, 32-40DOI: ( /j.tranon ) Copyright © 2016 The Authors Terms and Conditions
12
Figure 11 Forest plot depicting 1-year survival rates associated with different doses (2 and 10 mg/kg) of pembrolizumab. Translational Oncology 2016 9, 32-40DOI: ( /j.tranon ) Copyright © 2016 The Authors Terms and Conditions
13
Figure 12 Forest plot depicting overall response rates of different doses (0.3 and 2 mg/kg) of nivolumab. Translational Oncology 2016 9, 32-40DOI: ( /j.tranon ) Copyright © 2016 The Authors Terms and Conditions
14
Figure 13 Forest plot depicting the PFS rates associated with different doses (0.3 and 2 mg/kg) of nivolumab. Translational Oncology 2016 9, 32-40DOI: ( /j.tranon ) Copyright © 2016 The Authors Terms and Conditions
15
Figure 14 Forest plot depicting the OS rates associated with different doses (0.3 and 2 mg/kg) of nivolumab. Translational Oncology 2016 9, 32-40DOI: ( /j.tranon ) Copyright © 2016 The Authors Terms and Conditions
16
Figure 15 Forest plot depicting the overall response rates associated with different doses (0.3 and 10 mg/kg) of nivolumab. Translational Oncology 2016 9, 32-40DOI: ( /j.tranon ) Copyright © 2016 The Authors Terms and Conditions
17
Figure 16 Forest plot depicting PFS rates associated with different doses (0.3 and 10 mg/kg) of nivolumab. Translational Oncology 2016 9, 32-40DOI: ( /j.tranon ) Copyright © 2016 The Authors Terms and Conditions
18
Figure 17 Forest plot depicting the OS rates associated with different doses (0.3 and 10 mg/kg) of nivolumab. Translational Oncology 2016 9, 32-40DOI: ( /j.tranon ) Copyright © 2016 The Authors Terms and Conditions
19
Figure 18 Forest plot depicting the overall response rates associated with different doses (2 and 10 mg/kg) of nivolumab. Translational Oncology 2016 9, 32-40DOI: ( /j.tranon ) Copyright © 2016 The Authors Terms and Conditions
20
Figure 19 Forest plot depicting the OS rates associated with different doses (2 and 10 mg/kg) of nivolumab. Translational Oncology 2016 9, 32-40DOI: ( /j.tranon ) Copyright © 2016 The Authors Terms and Conditions
21
Figure 20 Forest plot depicting the PFS rates associated with different doses (2 and 10 mg/kg) of nivolumab. Translational Oncology 2016 9, 32-40DOI: ( /j.tranon ) Copyright © 2016 The Authors Terms and Conditions
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.