Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Application of Failure Mode and Effect Analysis to the Powder Coat Process Dr. Joan Burtner Chair, Department of Industrial Engineering and Industrial.

Published byNorman Mills Modified over 6 years ago

Similar presentations

Presentation on theme: "Application of Failure Mode and Effect Analysis to the Powder Coat Process Dr. Joan Burtner Chair, Department of Industrial Engineering and Industrial."— Presentation transcript:

1 Application of Failure Mode and Effect Analysis to the Powder Coat Process
Dr. Joan Burtner Chair, Department of Industrial Engineering and Industrial Management Mercer University School of Engineering, Macon, GA

2 Paint Cell Project Interdisciplinary team
Industrial management Industrial engineering Technical advisor - Joan Burtner External client Georgia manufacturer Practices Six Sigma philosophy ISE426ETM528 Spring2018 Presenter: Dr. Joan Burtner, Mercer University

3 Powder Coat Process Overview
Material - powdered paint Two basic application methods Part is lowered into a fluidized bed of the powder, which is electrostatically charged Powdered paint is electrostatically charged and sprayed onto the part Curing Part placed in an oven - powder particles melt and form a continuous film ISE426ETM528 Spring2018 Presenter: Dr. Joan Burtner, Mercer University

4 Powder Coat Equipment Spray Gun
Corona charging guns -electric power used to generate the electrostatic charge Tribot charging guns - electrostatic charge generated by friction between the powder and the gun barrel “Bell” charging guns -powder charged by being "flung" from the perimeter of the "bell ISE426ETM528 Spring2018 Presenter: Dr. Joan Burtner, Mercer University

5 Courtesy: www.thefabricator.com
Powder Coat Facility Typical Spray Booth Courtesy: Accessed March 12, 2004 ISE426ETM528 Spring2018 Presenter: Dr. Joan Burtner, Mercer University

6 Quality Issues Surface preparation Operators Coverage Color change
Training Skill Coverage Color change Cleanliness/ contamination ISE426ETM528 Spring2018 Presenter: Dr. Joan Burtner, Mercer University

7 Preliminary Process Map
Load Wash Dry Paint Cure Rework Accept Unload ISE426ETM528 Spring2018 Presenter: Dr. Joan Burtner, Mercer University

8 Key Customer Requirements
Minimal paint thickness Even coverage Scratch-free parts ISE426ETM528 Spring2018 Presenter: Dr. Joan Burtner, Mercer University

9 Cause and Effect Matrix
# Process Step Process Input Paint Thickness Even Coverage Damage Free Total Customer Imp 7 Customer Imp 9 Customer Imp 10 1 Load Hook 3* 3 78** 2 Conveyor 78 Spray Gun 9 154 4 Cure Temp 58 * Correlation values 0, 1, 3, **Sample calculation 7*3+9*3+10*3=78 ISE426ETM528 Spring2018 Presenter: Dr. Joan Burtner, Mercer University

10 Control Charting Deliverables
Target Factor - paint thickness Data collection plan Documentation of plan as standard operating procedure Control chart training materials Control charts of baseline data ISE426ETM528 Spring2018 Presenter: Dr. Joan Burtner, Mercer University

11 Control Charting Locations
Factor - paint thickness 5 locations Repeated measures 25 samples for baseline chart North West Middle East South ISE426ETM528 Spring2018 Presenter: Dr. Joan Burtner, Mercer University

12 Control Charting Sample Preliminary
Range not in control ISE426ETM528 Spring2018 Presenter: Dr. Joan Burtner, Mercer University

13 Control Charting Sample Results - Revised
Range in control Xbar not in control ISE426ETM528 Spring2018 Presenter: Dr. Joan Burtner, Mercer University

14 Designed Experiments Dependent variable - paint thickness
Factor 1 - location Factor 2 - shift Statistical software package - Minitab ISE426ETM528 Spring2018 Presenter: Dr. Joan Burtner, Mercer University

15 Failure Modes and Effects Analysis (FMEA) Techniques
48 process steps selected for investigation 4 experts polled Operators Management Ratings entered into basic FMEA worksheet RPNs calculated Process steps ranked by RPN (high to low) ISE426ETM528 Spring2018 Presenter: Dr. Joan Burtner, Mercer University

16 Failure Modes and Effects Analysis - Category Ratings 1
Severity of Effect (10-1) Hazardous without warning Hazardous with warning Loss of primary function Reduced primary function performance Loss of secondary function Reduced secondary function performance Minor defect noticed by most customers Minor defect noticed by some customers Minor defect noticed by discriminating customers No effect ISE426ETM528 Spring2018 Presenter: Dr. Joan Burtner, Mercer University

17 Failure Modes and Effects Analysis - Category Ratings 2
Likelihood of Occurrence 9 Very High: Almost inevitable 7 High: repeated failures 4 Moderate: Occasional failures 2 Low: Relatively few failures 1 Remote: Failure is unlikely ISE426ETM528 Spring2018 Presenter: Dr. Joan Burtner, Mercer University

18 Failure Modes and Effects Analysis - Category Ratings 3
Ability to Detect (10-1) Cannot detect 10 Very remote chance of detection Remote chance of detection Very low chance of detection Low chance of detection Moderately high chance of detection High chance of detection Very high chance of detection Almost certain detection 1 ISE426ETM528 Spring2018 Presenter: Dr. Joan Burtner, Mercer University

19 Risk Priority Number Example Calculations
Paint Material – accident or transport failure Potential Failure Effect Lack of paint consistency Severity of Effect rating 4 Potential Cause Dropped powder Likelihood of Occurrence rating 3 Current Control Lifting procedures Ability to Detect rating 3 Severity*Likelihood*Detection = 36 = RPN ISE426ETM528 Spring2018 Presenter: Dr. Joan Burtner, Mercer University

20 Failure Modes and Effects Analysis Results
Ratings ranged from 300s to 20s Uncontrolled process steps eliminated Critical controlled process steps Powder application - operator Cure process Powder application - spray gun Loading Unloading ISE426ETM528 Spring2018 Presenter: Dr. Joan Burtner, Mercer University

21 Control Plan Worksheet
Critical to Quality (CTQs) factors listed according to RPN ranking Process step as listed in process map Inputs/outputs Process specifications Measurement system Current control plan Control method Who Where When Reaction plan ISE426ETM528 Spring2018 Presenter: Dr. Joan Burtner, Mercer University

22 Control Plan Follow-up
Revision of current standard operating procedures (SOP) Establishment of standard operating procedures for CTQs that do not already have an SOP Periodic review ISE426ETM528 Spring2018 Presenter: Dr. Joan Burtner, Mercer University

Download ppt "Application of Failure Mode and Effect Analysis to the Powder Coat Process Dr. Joan Burtner Chair, Department of Industrial Engineering and Industrial."

Similar presentations

Is your FMEA performing for you? Measuring FMEA Effectiveness Kathleen Stillings – CPM, CQE, CQA, MBB Quality is not an act – it is a habit (Aristotle)

Is your FMEA performing for you? Measuring FMEA Effectiveness Kathleen Stillings – CPM, CQE, CQA, MBB Quality is not an act – it is a habit (Aristotle)
Where does Failure Mode and Effects Analysis (FMEA) come from?  Developed by the Aerospace industry in the1960s  Spread to the Automotive industry 

Where does Failure Mode and Effects Analysis (FMEA) come from?  Developed by the Aerospace industry in the1960s  Spread to the Automotive industry 
Failure Mode and Effect Analysis

Failure Mode and Effect Analysis
Application of Quality Improvement Techniques to the Powder Coat Process Joan Burtner, Chris Durre & Nikki Smith Department of Mechanical and Industrial.

Application of Quality Improvement Techniques to the Powder Coat Process Joan Burtner, Chris Durre & Nikki Smith Department of Mechanical and Industrial.
FMEA Applied to the Phenomenon of Retained Objects After Surgery Project Managers Dr. Joan Burtner and Dr. Laura Moody Mercer University School of Engineering.

FMEA Applied to the Phenomenon of Retained Objects After Surgery Project Managers Dr. Joan Burtner and Dr. Laura Moody Mercer University School of Engineering.
Failure Mode Effects Analysis Effects Analysis Risk Identification FMEA Risk Identification FMEA.

Failure Mode Effects Analysis Effects Analysis Risk Identification FMEA Risk Identification FMEA.
PURPOSE OF DFMEA (DESIGN FAILURE MODE EFFECTS ANALYSIS)

PURPOSE OF DFMEA (DESIGN FAILURE MODE EFFECTS ANALYSIS)
Validating and Improving Test-Case Effectiveness Author: Yuri Chernak Presenter: Lam, Man Tat.

Validating and Improving Test-Case Effectiveness Author: Yuri Chernak Presenter: Lam, Man Tat.
S ix S igma Client, Enterprise & Competitive Intelligence for Product, Process & Systems Innovation Dr. Rick L. Edgeman, University of Idaho IX C USTOMER.

S ix S igma Client, Enterprise & Competitive Intelligence for Product, Process & Systems Innovation Dr. Rick L. Edgeman, University of Idaho IX C USTOMER.
Six Sigma Quality Engineering

Six Sigma Quality Engineering
Risk Assessment in QbD David R. González Barreto 1 QbD Risk Assessment in QbD Introduction and Few Tools David R. González Barreto.

Risk Assessment in QbD David R. González Barreto 1 QbD Risk Assessment in QbD Introduction and Few Tools David R. González Barreto.
Failure Mode and Effect Analysis

Failure Mode and Effect Analysis
Failure Modes Effects Analysis (FMEA)

Failure Modes Effects Analysis (FMEA)
111. 222  Individually  Given your sample of M&Ms, build a Pareto diagram by color  Before you destroy the evidence, be sure you have an accurate count.

 Individually  Given your sample of M&Ms, build a Pareto diagram by color  Before you destroy the evidence, be sure you have an accurate count.
Failure Mode And Effects Analysis (FMEA). 2 FOR INTERNAL USE ONLY Module Objectives By the end of this module, the participant should be able to:  Construct.

Failure Mode And Effects Analysis (FMEA). 2 FOR INTERNAL USE ONLY Module Objectives By the end of this module, the participant should be able to:  Construct.
Failure Mode Effects Analysis (FMEA)

Failure Mode Effects Analysis (FMEA)
2013 PROCESS FAILURE MODES AND EFFECTS ANALYSIS.  Risk based thinking is not industry dependent!  Airline (1,895 air traffic control errors in 2012)

2013 PROCESS FAILURE MODES AND EFFECTS ANALYSIS.  Risk based thinking is not industry dependent!  Airline (1,895 air traffic control errors in 2012)
Failure Mode and Effect Analysis

Failure Mode and Effect Analysis
The Quality Improvement Model

The Quality Improvement Model
Section VI, Measure - Data & Process Analysis

Section VI, Measure - Data & Process Analysis

Similar presentations

Ads by Google