Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

DOE: Transition from MIE to Early Operations Kevin Reil LSST Camera Commissioning Lead LSST Commissioning Plan Review January 24-26, 2017.

Published byLanny Hartono Modified over 6 years ago

Similar presentations

Presentation on theme: "DOE: Transition from MIE to Early Operations Kevin Reil LSST Camera Commissioning Lead LSST Commissioning Plan Review January 24-26, 2017."— Presentation transcript:

1 DOE: Transition from MIE to Early Operations Kevin Reil LSST Camera Commissioning Lead LSST Commissioning Plan Review January 24-26, 2017

2 DOE: Transition from MIE to Early Operations
Introduction LSSTCam: LSST Camera Integration and Test (MIE project) Camera Summit Maintenance Facility ComCam: Commissioning Camera (DOE/NSF joint effort) LSST Camera Shipping Plan and Summit Reverification Camera Integration – Final AI&T Science!

3 Introduction

4 DOE: Transition from MIE to Early Operations
The LSST Camera is a DOE Major Item of Equipment (MIE) Project The DOE delivers the LSST Camera to commissioning LSST Camera is the DOE construction role LSST Science is the DOE construction purpose 3.2 Gpix Camera

5 Effort funded by DOE Early Ops & NSF MREFC
Funding Full Prepare ComCam LSSTCam Science! System AI&T / Commissioning WBS

6 Camera Personnel management through SLAC as a pool of camera resources (matrixed system)
Chief Rsch. Officer Sci. and Tech. Advisor Chief Tech. Officer Project Management Assurance Group SLAC Laboratory Director SLAC Deputy Director LSST Director LSST System Engineering and Commissioning SE manager System Scientist LSSTCam System Engineering Group LSSTCam Project Scientist LSSTCam Project Manager LSSTCam Deputy Project Manager LSSTCam Administration Group Commissioning Technical Coordination team DM AIV Lead Camera AIV Lead T&S AIV Lead Others … LSSTCam ES&H and QA Optics Sub-system Sensor Sub-system Cryostat Sub-system Science Raft Sub-system Auxiliary Electronics sub-system Data Acquisition Sub-system Corner Raft Sub-system Integration and test Camera Body&Shutter Sub-system Camera Control Sub-system 6

7 DOEs Role in Commissioning
There is only one LSST to commission A single plan and schedule has been developed together Activities in the commissioning schedule are staffed by personnel from both agencies +

8 DOE FTE vs FY Quarter Scientists Included
Utilizes resources made available during MIE ramp down Reference Vincent Riot Breakout presentation

9 DOE Costs vs FY Quarter Scientists Funded Separately
DOE Com Total Costs = $15.3M DOE Com Contingency = $3.8M DOE Com Total Costs w/o Contingency = $11.5M

10 DOE Technically Heavy Commissioning Periods
06C Planning, Preparation, Tooling, & Simulations .01 ComCam Development & Oversight .02 Camera Summit Servicing Area Prep 06C Early System AI&T .01 ComCam Shipping, Receiving & Reverification .03 Camera Refrigeration Pathfinder AI&T .04 ComCam - Telescope AI&T 06C Full System AI&T .01 Camera Shipping, Receiving & Reverification .02 Camera-Telescope AI&T FY17-19 FY19-20 FY20-21

11 DOE Scientifically Heavy Commissioning Periods
06C Early System AI&T .04 ComCam - Telescope AI&T .05 DMS + TCS/OCS + ComCam AI&T .06 Performance Optimization & Characterization 06C Full System AI&T .01 Camera Shipping, Receiving & Reverification .02 Camera-Telescope AI&T .03 DMS+ TCS/OCS + Cam. Integration .04 Performance Optimization & Characterization 06C Science Verification .01 Scheduler Driven mini-Surveys 1 .02 Scheduler Driven mini-Surveys 2 FY19-20 FY20-21 FY21

12 DOE MIE The LSST Camera

13 LSSTCam Integration and Test (MIE I&T)
LSST Camera I&T Manager  Also planning commissioning – Test Systems Equipment needed to test that requirements are met – Cryostat Integration Loading of RAFTs (sensors) into the cryostat with testing Ends with fully populated cryostat with utilities (UT) – Camera Body Integration Physical integration of the camera Ends with loaded cryostat and optics integration and final verification testing – Camera Shipping Container – DOE ComCam deliverables FY14-18 FY18-19 FY18-20

14 MIE 3.08.02 Camera I&T: Test Fixtures
All of the I&T fixtures are also delivered to LSST Final I&T test uses Camera Calibration Optical Bench (CCOB) CCOB is primary reverification tool during commissioning

15 MIE 3.08.03 Camera I&T: Cryostat Integration
Loading of RAFTs (sensors) into Cryostat Electro/optical testing (requirements verification) RAFT Integration Bench for Optical Test (BOT)

16 MIE 3.06.04 Camera I&T: Camera Integration
Integration of Camera Body and Mechanisms Ends with loaded cryostat being integrated and final optics integration and alignment Fully verified “Camera Ready to Ship” defines the end of I&T MIE continues to CD-4 This I&T activity also part of Summit Reverification This I&T activity also part of Summit Reverification

17 MIE 3. 08. 05 Camera Shipping Container MIE 3. 08
MIE Camera Shipping Container MIE DOE contributions to ComCam Camera Shipping Container I&T shipping container immediately preceeds commissioning WBS 04 Reference Travis Lange presentation ComCam plenary I&T delivery of MIE ComCam hardware immediately preceeds commissioning WBS 03 (almost immediately) Reference Jacques Sebag presentation

18 Phase 0 Camera Summit Maintenance Facility Preparation

19 Camera Summit Preparation Commissioning Planning, Preparation… Phase 0
The most DOE-centric activity is WBS 06C DOE outfits these rooms with tools, fixtures, etc Reference Travis Lange presentation(s) for how these areas are used in commissioning (and operations)

20 Camera Summit Preparation Commissioning Planning, Preparation… Phase 0
The summit facility has a camera maintenance facility. The DOE populates this area with fixtures from Camera I&T. Three areas of this facility are Class 10,000 clean room Cryostat servicing area (+ComCam) Class 100,000 white room Camera servicing area (+ComCam) Camera Staging and Test area Near the mirror recoating facility Full camera testing and servicing Tools, clean room consumables, M&S need to be procured, clean room operations implemented and preparations for camera I&T fixtures

21 3rd Floor Camera Maintenance Facility
White Room Camera Staging and Test Area Clean Room Utility Area Walkway Mirror Coating Facility

22 Phase 1 ComCam

23 ComCam Early System AI&T Phase 1
Jacques Sebag will cover ComCam in detail ComCam is a joint DOE/NSF camera that allows an early start for commissioning of: Telescope and Site, Camera Data Management ComCam is a large portion of the DOE effort in WBS ..03

24 Camera Refrigeration Pathfinder Early System AI&T Phase 1
ComCam also has a camera refrigeration pathfinder WBS 06C Refrigeration ground support equipment (compressors etc) need to be installed for ComCam (Note: ComCam is not cooled using camera refrigeration) Refrigeration Lines

25 ComCam Early System AI&T Phase 1
06C – ComCam goes onto the telescope 06C – DMS + TCS/OCS + ComCam AI&T The Commissioning Camera (ComCam) is designed to commission all camera functionality In this phase LSST is commissioning CCS  OCS DAQ  DM Telemetry Subsystem Interfaces Performance Optimization & Characterization

26 Phase 2 LSST Camera

27 Camera Shipping, Receiving & Reverification Full System AI&T Phase 2
This is the most DOE/Camera centric WBS element 06C Reference Travis Lange presentation Ship Camera from SLAC to Summit (LCA-nnnnn) Camera Unpack Reinstall L1/L2 – realign Functionality verified Camera Reverification (LCA-nnnnn)

28 Camera Shipping, Receiving & Reverification Full System AI&T Phase 2
Repeat of final phases of camera I&T on summit Fully verified camera ready to go onto the telescope This I&T activity also part of Summit Reverification This I&T activity also part of Summit Reverification

29 Fully verified camera ready to go onto the telescope

30 LSST Camera Full System AI&T Phase 2
06C – LSSTCam goes onto the telescope 06C – DMS+ TCS/OCS + Cam. Integration In this phase LSST is commissioning CCS  OCS DAQ  DM Telemetry Subsystem Interfaces Performance Optimization & Characterization Just as we did with ComCam!

31 DOE Phase Transition As the LSST Camera is operating well on the telescope the technical commissioning efforts are winding down Technical expertise needed for operations must be maintained Technical expertise needed to maintain the camera will need to be retained at the labs Transition to operations ongoing

32 Phase 3 Science Verification

33 Science! Science Verification Phase 3
Reference Keith Bechtol presentation on SV

34 Commissioning Phase 1, 2 and 3
After technical commissioning succeeds with ComCam, a period of intense sky observation follows. DOE scientific staff are heavily involved in this phase. After technical commissioning succeeds with LSSTCam, a period of intense sky observation follows. DOE scientific staff are heavily involved in this phase. Science Verification consists of two periods of intense sky observation follow. DOE scientific staff are heavily involved in this phase. Operations! Reference Beth Willman presentation

35 Summary We have developed a single integrated LSST commissioning plan and schedule The DOE and NSF are partners in this endeavor DOE activities and responsibilities are captured at the activity level

Download ppt "DOE: Transition from MIE to Early Operations Kevin Reil LSST Camera Commissioning Lead LSST Commissioning Plan Review January 24-26, 2017."

Similar presentations

Plans for LSE-130 through CD-2 Gregory Dubois-Felsmann SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory.

Plans for LSE-130 through CD-2 Gregory Dubois-Felsmann SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory.
WIYN Planning Meeting, February 28, 2013 Wisconsin, Indiana Yale, NOAO 0.9m Half Degree Imager – First Light.

WIYN Planning Meeting, February 28, 2013 Wisconsin, Indiana Yale, NOAO 0.9m Half Degree Imager – First Light.
Cost, Schedule & Funding Closeout Jan. 29-31 Joint DOE/NSF CD2/3a Review 1 DOE/NSF Review of the Dark Energy Survey (DES) Project SC 6/7 Cost, Schedule.

Cost, Schedule & Funding Closeout Jan Joint DOE/NSF CD2/3a Review 1 DOE/NSF Review of the Dark Energy Survey (DES) Project SC 6/7 Cost, Schedule.
NGAO Team Meeting Management Peter Wizinowich May 26, 2009.

NGAO Team Meeting Management Peter Wizinowich May 26, 2009.
A U.S. Department of Energy Office of Science Laboratory Operated by The University of Chicago Argonne National Laboratory Office of Science U.S. Department.

A U.S. Department of Energy Office of Science Laboratory Operated by The University of Chicago Argonne National Laboratory Office of Science U.S. Department.
1 Aurélien Barrau LPSC-Grenoble (CNRS / UJF) A few words on the LPSC The LPSC in few words: The scientific environment : Grenoble 4 Universities.

1 Aurélien Barrau LPSC-Grenoble (CNRS / UJF) A few words on the LPSC The LPSC in few words: The scientific environment : Grenoble 4 Universities.
Integration and Test 14 October 2008 Martin Nordby.

Integration and Test 14 October 2008 Martin Nordby.
Safety Council Meeting Tucson Arizona 10 – 11 April 2014 1 Safety Council Meeting Tucson Arizona 10 – 11 April 2014 LSST Project Status Victor L. Krabbendam.

Safety Council Meeting Tucson Arizona 10 – 11 April Safety Council Meeting Tucson Arizona 10 – 11 April 2014 LSST Project Status Victor L. Krabbendam.
1 Engineering the James Webb Space Telescope Paul Geithner JWST Deputy Project Manager - Technical March 26, 2011.

1 Engineering the James Webb Space Telescope Paul Geithner JWST Deputy Project Manager - Technical March 26, 2011.
October 24, 2000Milestones, Funding of USCMS S&C Matthias Kasemann1 US CMS Software and Computing Milestones and Funding Profiles Matthias Kasemann Fermilab.

October 24, 2000Milestones, Funding of USCMS S&C Matthias Kasemann1 US CMS Software and Computing Milestones and Funding Profiles Matthias Kasemann Fermilab.
LSST Camera Performance and Safety Assurance Plan and Safety Overview Joe Kenny Camera Safety Manager LSST Safety Council Review 18 August 2015.

LSST Camera Performance and Safety Assurance Plan and Safety Overview Joe Kenny Camera Safety Manager LSST Safety Council Review 18 August 2015.
Framework for Compliance, Verification, and Non-Conformance George Angeli LSST All-Hands Meeting Bremerton August 17, 2015.

Framework for Compliance, Verification, and Non-Conformance George Angeli LSST All-Hands Meeting Bremerton August 17, 2015.
I&T and Operating and Support Hazards Martin Nordby Chief Mechanical Engineer LSST Camera Safety Review August 18, 2015 R1.

I&T and Operating and Support Hazards Martin Nordby Chief Mechanical Engineer LSST Camera Safety Review August 18, 2015 R1.
1 BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES CF Role in NSLS-II Operations Marty Fallier Conventional Facilities Advisory Committee Review October 5-6, 2009.

1 BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES CF Role in NSLS-II Operations Marty Fallier Conventional Facilities Advisory Committee Review October 5-6, 2009.
August 2 and 3, 2010 Project Cost, Schedule, Risk and Contingency Jay Elias.

August 2 and 3, 2010 Project Cost, Schedule, Risk and Contingency Jay Elias.
LIGO-G010262-00-M Management of the LIGO Project Gary Sanders California Institute of Technology Presented to the Committee on Programs and Plans of the.

LIGO-G M Management of the LIGO Project Gary Sanders California Institute of Technology Presented to the Committee on Programs and Plans of the.
OFFICE OF SCIENCE 1 3. Cost Estimate Gines, Fisher 2.Are the estimated cost and proposed schedule ranges realistic, consistent with the technical and budgetary.

OFFICE OF SCIENCE 1 3. Cost Estimate Gines, Fisher 2.Are the estimated cost and proposed schedule ranges realistic, consistent with the technical and budgetary.
Telescope Integration and Tests Tuesday Afternoon.

Telescope Integration and Tests Tuesday Afternoon.
LSST Camera CD-3 Review Brookhaven National Laboratory, Brookhaven, NY 20151 LSST Safety Council Camera Review Bremerton, WA 2015 LSST Camera Environment,

LSST Camera CD-3 Review Brookhaven National Laboratory, Brookhaven, NY LSST Safety Council Camera Review Bremerton, WA 2015 LSST Camera Environment,
OFFICE OF SCIENCE 2.3 Infrastructure and Installation Sims, Edwards 1.Does the conceptual design and planned implementation satisfy the performance specifications.

OFFICE OF SCIENCE 2.3 Infrastructure and Installation Sims, Edwards 1.Does the conceptual design and planned implementation satisfy the performance specifications.

Similar presentations

Ads by Google