1. myProject Redesign Report
IEEE 802 ec EC
myProject Redesign Report
Roger Marks

2. myProject Redesign: Volunteer review session
Teleconference meeting held , 13:00-16:00 ET
Coordinated by diligent effort of David Law
Led by Greg Marchini of IEEE
~25 participants, including:
Paul Nikolich
Roger Marks
Jon Rosdahl
Geoff Thompson
Subir Das
Dorothy Stanley
David Law
Rick Alfvin
Bob Grow

3. Introduction Greg said this is the second such presentation
Will review the process flows
Will provide a demo
Without objection, meeting could be recorded for internal review
But recording feature was not operational

4. Status and review process
Links to the process documentation under review, and commenting process, have been provided, but no feedback has been provided yet
Reviewers should add comments by Wiki
Add comments below the relevant page
Submit as a guest (no login)
Add submitter’s name (or first name plus last initial) in the comment text, unless you prefer to remain anonymous

5. Main Process Blocks: Functional and Technical Requirements
1. PAR/NesCom
2. Invitation and Ballot
3. RevCom
4. Profile and Interests
5. Group Management
6. AudCom

6. Topics
Balloting was covered last time and won’t be repeated

7. PAR/NesCom Start: Submit PAR End: Active PAR
But then can be modified, extended, withdrawn
Also can be completed
Discussion about draft PAR editing and process control
Discussion about transition out of active PAR status by virtue of approval of standards, and linking PAR data to standard data
Discussion of NesCom process details

8. PAR submission module demo
Ran demo of PAR submission module
Shows action alerts and deadlines
Shows current PARs (draft, submitted, and active)
Discussion of how views are kept distinct based on role
e.g., one person in both WG Chair role and NesCom Member role
Discussion of details of draft PAR creation and submittal
Suggestion that export of draft PAR could include the field instructions
Reviewed process for sharing of draft PAR
Reviewed PAR processing pipeline, including NesCom process

9. Demo of RevCom submittal and review module
Many process details were discussed

10. Next steps Comments will be discussed by development team
Review will be solicited by a few other key volunteers
Staff is not ready to discuss next steps in detail
The testing and rollout approaches are not decided
Please comment (see slide 4)
Adjourned 15:33 ET