Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byBrett Reed Modified over 6 years ago
1
CRITERION B: RESTRICTED GEOGRAPHIC DISTRIBUTION THEORY AND EXAMPLES
IUCN Red List of Ecosystems Training @redlisteco IUCN Red List of Ecosystems
2
Model of Ecosystem Risk Assessment
Spatial Symptoms Threatening processes Risk of loss of characteristic native biota Ecosystem distribution Ecosystem function D Altered biotic B Small distribution A Declining C Degradation of abiotic environment E Quantitative risk analysis
3
Criterion B: Restricted distribution
Identifies ecosystems whose distribution is so restricted that they are at risk of collapse from the chance occurrence of a single or few interacting threatening events
4
Criterion B: Restricted distribution
Estimating spatial extent Risk spreading against spatially explicit threats In widely distributed ecosystems, risk from spatially explicit threats is spread across multiple independent patches NOT true if distribution is restricted
5
Risk spreading Magnitude of ‘insurance effect’ depends on the extent and configuration of ecosystem relative to the spatial extent of threatening processes
6
Criterion B: Restricted distribution
Assumptions Spatial extent is informative about future risks Ecosystems with restricted distributions have: Less capacity to spread risks posed by spatially explicit threats (insurance effects, contagion-percolation theory) Less capacity for rescue processes, e.g. dispersal & recolonization (metapopulation theory) Distribution size is context-dependent on spatial features of threats
7
Criterion B: Restricted distribution
Two standard spatial risk-spreading metrics: Polygons (EOO) Grids (AOO) Measures the spatial spread of risk, NOT an estimate of mapped area Use of non-standard measures invalidates comparison against criteria thresholds
8
Criterion B: Metrics Extent of occurrence (EOO)
Minimum convex polygon enclosing all extant occurrences
9
Criterion B: Metrics Extent of occurrence (EOO)
Minimum convex polygon enclosing all extant occurrences Area of occupancy (AOO) Number of occupied 10 x 10 km grid cells Can exclude small fragments (1% occupancy rule) Scale-sensitive Standardised method of (spatial) estimation Broad/fine ecosystem units
10
Coarser scale ~ larger area estimate
Criterion B: Metrics Area estimates depend on map scale (cf. grid cell size) Standard methods of area measurement needed to ensure consistency: 10 x 10 grid cells Coarse scale 544 km2 Fine scale 348 km2 Medium scale 416 km2 Coarser scale ~ larger area estimate
11
Criterion B: Metrics Extent of occurrence (EOO) Minimum
convex polygon c.5,000 km2 10km cells occupied (46) occupied >1% (12) Endangered: B1 & B2 Extent of occurrence (EOO) Minimum convex polygon enclosing all extant occurrences Area of occupancy (AOO) Number of occupied 10 x 10 km grid cells Can exclude small fragments (1% occupancy rule) Scale-sensitive Standardised method of (spatial) estimation Broad/fine ecosystem units
12
Criterion B: Metrics Threat-defined location
Extent of occurrence (EOO) Minimum convex polygon enclosing all extant occurrences Area of occupancy (AOO) Number of occupied 10 x 10 km grid cells Can exclude small fragments (1% occupancy rule) Scale-sensitive Standardised method of (spatial) estimation Broad/fine ecosystem units Threat-defined location Geographically or ecologically distinct area in which a single threatening process can rapidly affect occurrences of an ecosystem
13
Criterion B: Metrics Threat-defined location
Geographically or ecologically distinct area in which a single threatening process can rapidly affect occurrences of an ecosystem Portion of the distribution simultaneously affected by one threatening process. Relative to the spatial extent of the most serious plausible threat. Size depends on area covered by the threatening process NOT # of sites. IS # of spatially independent events that could threaten the ecosystem type 26 patches 4 locations 26 fragments 4 locations
14
Criterion B: Restricted distribution
B. Restricted geographic distribution indicated by ANY OF B1, B2 or B3: Subcriterion Measure of geographic distribution CR EN VU B1 Extent of a minimum convex polygon (km2) enclosing all occurrences (extent of occurrence, EOO) is: ≤ 2,000 ≤ 20,000 ≤ 50,000 AND at least one of the following (a-c): (a) An observed or inferred continuing decline in ANY OF: i. a measure of spatial extent appropriate to the ecosystem; OR ii. a measure of environmental quality appropriate to the characteristic biota of the ecosystem; OR iii. a measure of disruption to biotic interactions appropriate to the characteristic biota of the ecosystem. (b) Observed or inferred threatening processes that are likely to cause continuing declines in geographic distribution, environmental quality or biotic interactions within the next 20 years. (c) Ecosystem exists at: 1 threat-defined location ≤ 5 threat-defined locations ≤ 10 threat-defined locations B2 The number of 10×10 km grid cells occupied (area of occupancy, AOO) are: ≤ 2 ≤ 20 ≤ 50 AND at least one of a-c above (same as for B1). B3 A very small number of threat-defined locations (generally fewer than 5) AND prone to the effects of human activities or stochastic events within a very short time period in an uncertain future, and thus capable of Collapse or becoming Critically Endangered (CR) within a very short time period (B3 can only lead to a listing as Vulnerable, VU).
15
Threatening process causing continuing decline w/in next 20 years
Criterion B: Restricted distribution B1 and/or B2 Continuing decline Threatening process causing continuing decline w/in next 20 years Number of locations B3 # locations AND capable of becoming CR or CO very quickly If there are no plausible threats, do not consider locations at all
16
Criterion B: Restricted distribution
Criterion B can only be met if EOO/AOO thresholds are met AND subcritera are met. Subcriteria distinguish ecosystems that are restricted & stable from those that are restricted & declining. Subcriteria only require qualitative evidence (no thresholds, except for # of locations) Includes fragmentation, landscape condition models, and other summary variables
17
Criterion B: Examples Type of Mesophytic deciduous broad-leaved and mixed coniferous-broad-leaved forests
18
Criterion B: Examples Area = 260 km²
19
Criterion B: Examples EOO = 589 km² Area = 260 km²
Extent of Occurrence (EOO): ability to spread risk over contiguous areas EOO = 589 km² Area = 260 km²
20
Criterion B: Examples EOO = 589 km² = CR B1?
Must first check to see if at least one of the subcriteria are met – must meet both EOO AND subcriteria EOO = 589 km² = CR B1?
21
AOO = 9 Criterion B: Examples 9 of 11 grid cells ≥1 km² occupied
Area of Occupancy (AOO): Ability to spread risks among occupied patches 9 of 11 grid cells ≥1 km² occupied AOO = 9 <1 km² <1 km²
22
Criterion B: Examples AOO = 9 = EN B2?
Must meet both AOO AND subcriteria AOO = 9 = EN B2?
23
Criterion B: Examples Type of Mesophytic deciduous broad-leaved and mixed coniferous-broad-leaved forests
24
Criterion B: Examples
25
Criterion B: Examples Extent of Occurrence: ability to spread risks over contiguous areas EOO = 53,310 km²
26
Criterion B: Examples Extent of Occurrence: ability to spread risks over contiguous areas EOO = 53,310 km² = B1 (subcriteria)
27
Criterion B: Examples Area of Occupancy: 84 of 91 grid cells >1% occupied AOO = 84 grid cells = B2
28
Criterion B: Examples EOO = 53,310 km² = B1 AOO = 84 grid cells = B2
29
Contact If you want to contact us, write us to:
Join our forum of evaluators in: Follow us on: IUCN Red List of Ecosystems @redlisteco @redlist_of_ecosystems
30
Thank you to our donors, supporters & partners
Similar presentations
© 2024 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.