Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Neighbourhood Management Survey 2010/11

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Neighbourhood Management Survey 2010/11"— Presentation transcript:

1 Neighbourhood Management Survey 2010/11
Glasgow Community Planning Partnership Neighbourhood Management Survey 2010/11 CPP summary: Pollokshields and Southside Central

2 Background local communities and service providers working together to improve and join up services responding to local need introduced in Glasgow in 2007 underpinned by robust evidence gathered from large residents survey outcomes: focussing additional investment in key priorities and re-alignment of some local services

3 Methodology face to face household survey
conducted by BMG Research, managed by GHA representative sample at a ward level by tenure, age, gender, ethnicity and economic status 6,934 interviews conducted Citywide between December 2010 and February 2011 confidence of +/-1.18% at the 95% level increases for CPP level results – 404 interviews in local CPP area. Confidence of +/- 4.9%

4 Key Findings (1) satisfaction with local neighbourhood as a place to live, but lower than in 2007 most feel they belong in the area most residents feel safe in their neighbourhood, higher than 2007 what would local residents change? more police on the streets cleaner streets more jobs

5 Key Findings (2) residents are most positive about a number of amenities/facilities of local CPP area: access to shops / banks attractive homes less positive about: youth provision/activities for young people children’s play areas most commonly reported problems: drunk or rowdy behaviour street drinking disruptive children/teenagers vandalism / graffiti

6 Key Findings (3) most rate a range of public services as good including rubbish collection, local health services, transport and policing which is rated good by almost two-thirds of residents but only 40% rate youth and leisure services as good environmental issues of concern: litter dog roaming/fouling untidy gardens and communal areas fly tipping

7 Summary Changes Key Indicators 2010/11 2007
Change since 2007 (p.p) % Satisfied with Neighbourhood 78% 88% -10 % Feeling safe in neighbourhood 72% 62% +10 Attractive environment - % rating as good 64% +8 Parks/open spaces - % rating as good 61% +17 Childrens play areas - % rating as good 58% 38% +20 Street drinking - % reporting as a problem 26% 14% +12 Vandalism/graffiti - % reporting as a problem 20% +6 Road safety - % reporting as a problem 7% 25% -18 Street litter - % reporting as a problem 53% 30% +23 Fly Tipping/Dumping - % reporting as a problem 37% Rubbish collection - % reporting as good 84% Policing - % reporting as good 44% +18 Youth/Leisure services - % reporting as good 40% 27% +13

8 Housing and neighbourhood

9 Satisfaction with neighbourhood as a place to live
Overall, how satisfied or dissatisfied are you with your neighbourhood as a place to live? % satisfied: Citywide = 87% 2007 local CPP = 88% * denotes less than 0.5%

10 Do you believe your neighbourhood has become a better place to live, a worse place to live or has it remained the same over the last year? % better: Citywide = 9% 2007 local CPP = 6%

11 Reasons why the neighbourhood is better or worse (top 10 reasons)

12 What one thing, if anything, would you change about your neighbourhood that would help improve your quality of life?

13 How would you rate the quality of your neighbourhood in
terms of each of the following...% rating as good?

14 How would you rate the quality of your neighbourhood in
terms of each of the following...% rating as good? CPP 2010 Citywide 2010 % difference CPP 2007 Attractive homes 81% 86% -5% - Attractive neighbourhood 77% 83% -6% Attractive environment 72% -9% 64% +8% Quiet and peaceful environment 74% 82% -8% 59% +15% Park/open spaces 78% +4% 61% +17% Children’s play areas 58% 49% +9% 38% +20% Access to shops 93% 88% +5% Access to banks 90% Access to Credit unions 51% 53% -2% Reputation 73% 79% Cleanliness / free of rubbish or litter -13% Youth provision / activities for young people 47% 48% -1%

15 Are each of the following a serious problem, a slight problem or
not a problem in the local area...? % a problem

16 Are each of the following a serious problem, a slight problem or
not a problem in the local area...? % a problem CPP 2010 Citywide 2010 % difference CPP 2007 Problems with neighbours including noise/loud parties 20% 14% +6%  - - Disruptive children/teenagers 26% 22% +4% Drunk or rowdy behaviour 28% Street Drinking 21% +5% +12% Drug use or drug dealing 16% 15% +1% Harassment/racial harassment 11% 7% Vandalism/graffiti 19% +7% Vehicle break in/theft 12% 10% +2% 8% House break ins/burglary +3% Personal safety/security 9% Road safety 13% -6% 25% -18% Safety of children -1% -7% Safety of other vulnerable groups 5% Other types of crime

17 Have you personally experienced any of the following problems specifically with a neighbour or any of your neighbours in the past year?

18 Reporting problems in the neighbourhood
66% reported the problem experienced the largest proportion reported to Strathclyde Police (60%) and Housing Associations (23%) 23% are satisfied with the way their problem was dealt with, with 77% dissatisfied (cf. Glasgow 43%, 40%) the most common reasons for not reporting the problem are: fear of reprisal (56%); and It wouldn’t make any difference (49%)

19 How safe would you feel walking alone in your area after dark?
% safe / unsafe: - Citywide = 74% / 11% local CPP = 62% / 21%

20 To what extent do you feel that you belong to this neighbourhood?
% strongly: - Citywide = 85%

21 Cleansing and environment

22 How would you rate the quality of the following services
in and around your local area?

23 How would you rate the quality of the following services
in and around your local area? - % reporting as good CPP 2010 Citywide 2010 % difference CPP 2007 Rubbish collection 84% 85% -1% 0% Youth and leisure services 40% 36% +4% 27% +13% Policing 62% 54% +8% 44% +18% Health centre/GP 93% 89% 87% +6% Public Transport 90% 82% 77%

24 Could you tell me whether the following are a serious problem, slight problem, or not a problem in your local area...?

25 - % reporting as a problem
Could you tell me whether the following are a serious problem, slight problem, or not a problem in your local area...? - % reporting as a problem CPP 2010 Citywide 2010 % difference CPP 2007 Abandoned/burnt out vehicles 7% 4% +3% 6% +1% Litter in the streets 53% 41% +12% 30% +23% Untidy gardens 37% 24% +13% 18% +19% Untidy communal areas 21% +16% Dirty stairs/closes 31% 14% +17% 16% +15% Graffiti 17% +7% 20% +4% Fly tipping and dumping Pets/animals roaming/dog fouling 42% 39% - General maintenance of open spaces 35% Car parking 23% +6%

26 Taking account of views / opportunities for involvement

27 How much account do you feel that GCC takes of residents’
views when making decisions?

28 What are your preferred methods about having your say about GCC services?

29 Thank you


Download ppt "Neighbourhood Management Survey 2010/11"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google