Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byἸοῦστος Καψής Modified over 6 years ago
1
A prospective validation of the HEART score for chest pain patients at the emergency department
B.E. Backus, A.J. Six, J.C. Kelder, M.A.R. Bosschaert, E.G. Mast, A. Mosterd, R.F. Veldkamp, A.J. Wardeh, R. Tio, R. Braam, S.H.J. Monnink, R. van Tooren, T.P. Mast, F. van den Akker, M.J.M. Cramer, J.M. Poldervaart, A.W. Hoes, P.A. Doevendans International Journal of Cardiology Volume 168, Issue 3, Pages (October 2013) DOI: /j.ijcard Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ireland Ltd Terms and Conditions
2
Fig. 1 Patient flow in the HEART score validation study.
AMI=acute myocardial infarction. CABG=coronary artery bypass graft. PCI=percutaneous coronary intervention. MACE=major adverse coronary events. International Journal of Cardiology , DOI: ( /j.ijcard ) Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ireland Ltd Terms and Conditions
3
Fig. 2 Kaplan–Meier curves for the occurrence of major adverse cardiac events. International Journal of Cardiology , DOI: ( /j.ijcard ) Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ireland Ltd Terms and Conditions
4
Fig. 3 Probability of reaching a MACE related to the three risk scores. Only for the purpose of comparing graphs we divided the TIMI and GRACE scores in deciles in order to achieve the same distribution as the HEART score on the x-axis. All other computations were made with the original values. International Journal of Cardiology , DOI: ( /j.ijcard ) Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ireland Ltd Terms and Conditions
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.