1. 2017 REMEDI Pump Survey
Rich Zink

2. Value (n = 24, pool = 173, 14% Response)
1 = To a very great extent
2 = To a great extent
3 = To some extent
4 = To a little extent
5 = Not at all
6 = I am unaware of this

3. Quotes
REMEDI has greatly helped us identify areas for performance improvement with our Plum360 infusion pump drug library alerts.
Benchmarking against other like hospitals to determine whether we accomplished the current standard of care and it's not just a number. Relative value.
REMEDI has simplified the reporting and investigative process for our site. It takes away many of the challenges one is faced with in an attempt to interpret data from the vendor's standard reporting system.
Remedi is my first stop when entering a new drug into Alaris.
can we have a Suite of reports prepared by Remedi and presented to the end user
"""REMEDI is an invaluable network that challenges the status quo around smart pump technology and reporting capabilities."" "“The knowledge and resources provided through REMEDI provides health systems complimentary tools to optimize the use and programming of smart pump technology."" "
REMEDI has been awesome to make our program safer as well as give us a benchmark for our program. I would love to attend a conference, but unfortunately travel and time is not in the budget.

4. Use 1 = More often than weekly 2 = Weekly 3 = Monthly 4 = Quarterly
5 = Less often than Quarterly
6 = I am unaware of this

5. Satisfaction
1 = Excellent
2 = Good
3 = Average
4 = Poor
5 = Terrible

6. Feedback on tools & services
I would like to be able to pull more data when basic infusion mode is used - what care profile, time of day, possibly what meds were programmed before and after, etc. This would help me better understand why basic infusion is being used so I can target my compliance education where it is needed.
Website not as intuitive as it could be (but in know this is a work in progress). Once I know how to use it better, I will use it more.
I would love for the system to be able to generate and out monthly reports to users like the vendor programs.
Some of the documents for uploading Alaris datasets do not reflect the new interoperability software and do not contain the same excel fields to load into CatalyzeCare that results in an "error" each time an attempt to upload the library is made.

7. Desired Frequency 1 = Monthly 2 = Quarterly 3 = Semi-Annually

8. Best Day for Virtual Conferences

9. Length of Virtual Conferences

10. Feedback on Improving Virtuals
Keeping topics scoped and the number presented to a minimum. Consider having presenters engage REMEDI users prior to the conference by having a poll.

11. Length of In-Person Conference

12. Ranking Start day for In-Person
Wednesday [2.7]
Monday [2.8]
Tuesday [3.0]
Thursday [3.8]
Friday [4.9]
Sunday [5.1]
Saturday [5.7]

13. Feedback on Improving In-Person
This year's conference in Rosemont was excellent. I'm hopeful that my company will allow me to attend in the coming years.
Having an onsite website tutorial refresher and demo for people to attend
2 full days
forced networking or speed networking
Not a suggestion, but I found the scheduled vendor time helpful.
Suggest having vendor session on first day with follow up on the third day. This would facilitate the vendor having time to develop the appropriate answer and feedback to the group.

14. Suggested Conference Topics
Strategies other organization use to improve drug library compliance (i.e. - clinicians using the drug library instead of "basic infusion").
real life examples of how the data was mined from the site to affect change in an organization. Essentially mapping out processes that others have found helpful in their hospital using the site
"(1) Comparing and contrasting various data analytics reporting tools (eg, REMEDI, eHR reports, pump-specific software) (2) Quantifying interoperability implementation and averted errors pre- and post-implementation"

15. New Application Ranking

16. Suggested Applications
something to help with clamped tubing (dose omissions)
Associating infusion pump data with the EHR data. For example, if a heparin drip was mistakenly programmed to run over 1 hour and the alert was bypassed was it documented as administered? Looking to identify the patient harm that occurred, not the harm that may potentially have occurred. Suggest focusing on a few high-alert drugs as a pilot (e.g. - insulin, heparin, potassium chloride, and morphine).

17. Why Didn’t You attend? [N = 16]
Other = Time & Budget

18. Value of Presentations (n = 8)
1 = To a very great extent
2 = To a great extent
3 = To some extent
4 = To a little extent
5 = Not at all
6 = I didn’t attend

19. Value of Conference Components
1 = Excellent
2 = Good
3 = Average
4 = Poor
5 = Terrible

20. Want Presentations On-line at Conference?

21. Feedback to improve Conference
The April conference was SUPER....excellent and pertinent presentations
This was my first attendance. Was a great experience and very informative.
Great group, setting and presentations. Some of the research focused presentations were a little out of scope for clinicians. One of the best conferences I have attended though!
I really appreciate the multidisciplinary inclusion of conference speakers and representing multiple vendors.
First time attended and was great

22. Final Thoughts
Keep up the great work. Excellent collaborative to be involved with.
Thanks for hosting a great conference!