Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byGladys Hancock Modified over 6 years ago
1
Posterior surgery for Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy Mehmet Zileli, M
Posterior surgery for Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy Mehmet Zileli, M.D. Izmir - Turkey
2
CSM Posterior Decompression
Indications Posterior compression >2 level anterior compression Hyperlordosis Contraindications Kyphosis 1-2 level anterior compression
3
Anterior vs Posterior Surgery? Decision Making
1-Site of compression 2-Cervical curve 3-Number of compressions 4-Patient’s general condition, bone quality
4
Anterior vs Posterior Surgery? Importance of Site of Compression
Anterior compression Anterior surgery Posterior compression Posterior surgery Anterior & posterior compression ??? The number of levels ? Instability ?
5
Anterior vs Posterior Surgery? Importance of
Curve Kyphotic curve Anterior surgery Multiple levels ?? Hyperlordotic curve Posterior surgery Lordosis preserved - lost ???
6
Age is not a factor alone Graft problems if osteoporotic
Anterior vs Posterior Surgery? Patient’s age, general condition, bone quality Age is not a factor alone Graft problems if osteoporotic Poor general condition Posterior surgery > Anterior surgery
7
Complications of Anterior Surgery appr. 20-25%
1-Neurological complications 2-Cervical site compl. Airway problems Hematom Esophageal injury Vascular Hoarseness Dysphagia Chylothorax 3-Graft related compl. Graft dislocation Pseudarthrosis Adjacent level degeneration Plate & screw problems 4-Graft site compl.
8
CSM: Posterior Surgery
Advantages 1-Very good technique for decompression of structures from posterior such as ligamentum flavum hypertrophy. Disadvantages 1-Increasing instability resulting in osteophyte formation 2-Hard discs and anterior osteophytes are not possible to remove, if attempted, it would cause root injury 3-Neurological complications are more in comparison to anterior surgery
9
Posterior Surgery Absolute Indications
44 y.o. male, quadriparesis for 5-6 yrs, gait disturbance for 1 yr, sphincter disturbance Posterior compression only > posterior surgery
10
Posterior Surgery Absolute Indications
79 y.o. Female, walking disturbance for years. Inability to walk for 1 month, wheel-chair dependent. MRI: severe anterior and posterior compression at C3-4. Coronary artery disease, high risk for cardiac reasons
11
Posterior Surgery Relative Indications
72 y.o. Male. Tetraparesisi prominent on right side for 1 year. MRI C severe narrowing T2 hyperintensity , lordotic curve.
12
C4-5-6 laminectomy, lateral mass plate
13
3 levels anterior-posterior compression, lordosis is preserved > posterior surgery
Postop MRI
14
CSM: Posterior Surgery
Laminectomy & Fusion Lateral mass fixation Laminoplasty Hemilateral opening Bilateral opening
15
Laminectomy & Fusion Lateral mass fixation
16
Laminoplasty Unilateral opening Bilateral opening
17
Laminoplasty
18
Laminectomy or Laminoplasty?
Causes instability Laminectomy membrane Laminoplasty Technically demanding Restricted neck movements Insufficient decompression?
19
Outcome Anterior vs Posterior
Success rates range between 70-85% in different series Duration of symptoms are important
20
Complications Anterior vs Posterior
Functional outcomes similar But complications greater with corpectomy Yonenobu, et. al. – Spine, 1992 Heller, et. al. – Spine, 2001 Wada, et. al. – Spine, 2001 Edwards, et.al. – Spine, 2002
21
Conclusions For multi-level anterior compression
< 2 Levels Multi-level ACDF 2 Levels Corpectomy >2 Levels Laminectomy or Laminoplasty For multi-level diffuse (e.g. congenital) compression No Kyphosis Laminoplasty or corpectomy Kyphosis Corpectomy
22
Conclusions With proper indications, results comparable with either corpectomy or laminectomy / laminaplasty Higher complication rate with corpectomy
23
CSM Posterior Decompression
Indications Posterior compression >2 level anterior compression Hyperlordosis Contraindications Kyphosis 1-2 level anterior compression
Similar presentations
© 2024 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.