1. TEST IDENTIFICATION PARADE
satish bhardwaj

2. T.I.P. TO ESTABLISH THE IDENTIFICATION OF ACCUSED / CASE PROPERTY
WHEN THE IDENTITY OF AN ACCUSED PERSON OR THE SUSPECT IS NOT KNOWN TO THE WITNESSES OR
NOT ARRESTED AT THE SPOT
TEST IDENTIFICATION PARADE OF AN ACCUSED PERSON
THE PROPERTY RECOVERED AT THE INSTANCE OF THE ACCUSED PERSON
TEST IDENTIFICATION OF THE CASE PROPERTY

3. THE IDENTIFICATION PROCESS IS AN IMPORTANT LINK TO ESTABLISH THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN THE CRIME AND THE CRIMINAL(S)
JUDICIAL T.I.P. HAS GOT MORE AUTHENTICITY THAN THE TIP BEFORE THE POLICE
AFTER THE JUDICIAL T.I.P. ONUS OF PROVING INNOCENCE LIES ON ACCUSED PERSON(S)

4. TEST IDENTIFICATION OF AN ACCUSED PERSON
NOT RELEVANT WHEN VICTIM AND ACCUSED ARE KNOWN TO EACH OTHER
MANDATORY ONLY IN THE CASES WHERE ACCUSED HAS NOT BEEN ARRESTED AT THE PLACE OF OCCURRENCE

5. STEPS TO BE TAKEN
COVER THE FACE OF THE ACCUSED IMMEDIATELY AFTER THE ARREST
MAKE NOTE IN THE DAILY DIARY, ARREST MEMO, CASE DIARY AND REMAND APPLICATION
MAKE NOTE ON THE WARRANT TO BE SENT TO THE JAIL AUTHORITIES
INSTRUCT THE ACCUSED TO REMAIN MUFFLED FACE EVEN IN J.C. – MAKE SIMILAR NOTE

6. contd. . . . PRODUCE THE ACCUSED BEFORE THE M.M. AS SOON AS POSSIBLE
SEND THE ACCUSED TO J.C. AND SIMULTANEOUSLY MAKE THE REQUEST FOR TIP BEFORE THE M.M.
CHECK THAT THE M.M. HAS MADE THE NOTE ON THE APPLICATION FOR T.I.P. THAT THE ACCUSED WAS PRODUCED MUFFLED FACE
T.I.P. SHOULD BE GOT CONDUCTED AS EARLY AS POSSIBLE SO THAT NO SUSPICION IS RAISED

7. contd
COPY OF D.D. ENTRIES/RELEVANT DOCUMENTS BE PLACED ON JUDICIAL FILE
DONOT TAKE THE PHOTOGRAPHS FOR DOSSIER – PHOTOGRAPHS ONLY AFTER T.I.P.
DONOT ALLOW THE PRESS TO TAKE PHOTOGRAPHS OF UNMUFFLED FACE OF ACCUSED
ENSURE THAT UNMUFFLED FACE IS NOT PHOTOGRAPHED BY MOBILE etc.
DONOT TAKE THE ACCUSED FOR IDENTIFICATION OF PLACE OF OCCURRENCE BEFORE T.I.P.

8. contd
AVOID CHANCE T.I.P.
IN CASE ACCUSED PERSON HAS TO BE KEPT IN LOCK-UP DURING NIGHT – KEEP HIM BEHIND THE CURTAIN – MAKE D.D. ENTRY, INSTRUCT THE SENTRY, DONOT ALLOW ANY UN-AUTHORISED PERSON TO THE LOCK-UP
MENTION THE FACT OF KEEPING THE ACCUSED MUFFLED FACE IN ALL THE STATEMENTS RECORDED U/S 161 Cr.P.C. – STAFF PRESENT AT THE TIME OF ARREST, DO, SENTRY, CONSTABLE KEEPING THE CUSTODY/TAKING TO THE COURT/TAKING FOR MEDICAL EXAMINATION etc.

9. SUFFICIENT NUMBER OF PERSONS TO PARTICIPATE IN THE T.I.P.
INCLUDE PERSONS OF THE SAME RACE, CLASS AND SAME BUILT AND WEARING SIMILAR DRESS
SAME DEFORMITY/BEARD etc.
ATLEAST 9 /10 PERSONS - TOO MANY PERSONS MAY CONFUSE THE WITNESSES
I.O. TO WITHDRAW FROM THE ROOM – NO POLICE PERSONNEL SHOULD REMAIN PRESENT INSIDE, NEAR OR WITHIN SIGHT OF THE PLACE OF T.I.P.

10. WITNESSES SHOULD BE KEPT SEPARATE SO THAT THEY DONOT SEE THE ACCUSED BEING TAKEN TO THE PLACE OF T.I.P.
WITNESSES TO GO TO THE ROOM WHERE T.I.P. IS HELD ONLY ONE BY ONE
WITNESS PARTICIPATED IN THE T.I.P. SHOULD BE KEPT SEPARATE FROM THE REMAINING WITNESSES
T.I.P. THROUGH PHOTOGRAPH ? WHEN ACCUSED ABSCONDING – PHOTOGRAPHS SHOULD NOT BE SHOWN TO THE WITNESSES IN ADVANCE

11. BAILED OUT ACCUSED SHOULD BE INFORMED IN WRITING
T.I.P. ONLY WHEN THE WITNESSES WERE IN A POSITION TO SEE THE ACCUSED PERSON(S)
OBTAIN COPY OF T.I.P. PROCEEDINGS

12. TEST IDENTIFICATION OF CASE PROPERTY
SEIZURE OF CASE PROPERTY THROUGH PROPER SEIZURE MEMO – MAKE PARCEL, IF PRACTICAL
INDEPENDENT WITNESSES TO THE SEIZURE PROCESS
DEPOSIT THE CASE PROPERTY IN THE MAALKHAANAA WITHOUT LOSS OF TIME
DONOT PRODUCE THE CASE PROPERTY FOR PHOTOGRAPHS BEFORE THE PRESS

13. contd
ARRANGE FOR SIMILAR/RESEMBLING PROPERTIES ( SUFFICIENT NUMBER ) FOR T.I.P.
MOVE THE APPLICATION TO THE M.M.
SUMMON THE WITNESS (S) WELL IN ADVANCE
INFORM THE WITNESSES ABOUT DATE/TIME/COURT NAME
WITHDRAW THE CASE PROPERTY FROM MAALKHAANAA AFTER MAKING PROPER ENTRY IN THE DAILY DIARY
ENSURE THAT THE PROPER ENTRY IS MADE IN MAALKHAANAA REGISTER REGARDING TAKING THE CASE PROPERTY TO THE COURT

14. contd. . . . ENSURE THAT WITNESSES ARE PRESENT IN THE COURT
I.O. TO LEAVE THE COURT ROOM DURING T.I.P. PROCEEDINGS
OBTAIN COPY OF T.I.P. PROCEEDINGS

15. ANY QUERRY PLEASE ? ? ?