1. Registry Information Session
The Petroleum Registry of Alberta Energizing the flow of information
Registry Information Session
September 22, 2005

2. Agenda Registry Update: DOE Update: EUB Update:
Natural Gas Royalty Regime Annual Allowable Costs Project Update
Registry Website Project
Importance of Correct Contact Information
DOE Update:
Provisional Assessments
DOE Oil Business Unit (Oil/APMC) Report Enhancements
EUB Update:
Reporting Error Rates
EUB Compliance Assurance - Enforcement Directive 019
Industry Registry Team Update:
Industry Registry Planning 2005/06
Training and Support
Questions and Answers.

3. 1. Registry Update
Natural Gas Royalty Regime Annual Allowable Costs Project Update.
Registry Website Project.
Importance of Correct Contact Information .

4. Natural Gas Royalty Regime Annual Allowable Costs Project Update
Project remains on schedule.
AC1 process now in Acceptance Testing with implementation date set for October 11, 2005.
Industry members encouraged to assist in this testing process.
AC2-5 design sessions and development continues.
AC2-5 implementation – February, 2006.

5. Registry Website Project
Conversion to editing tool: Red Dot.
Improved administration of website
Ease of use
Take this time to revamp website to better reflect customer needs.
Improved “look and feel”.
Important content moved closer to user.
Other content areas edited or removed.
Implementation: Mid to late October 2005.

10. Importance of Correct Contact Information
Non-operators require contact information to question facility operators regarding data submitted.
When there is a problem with batch files and report requests the Registry staff is required to contact the submitter.
The Registry system creates notifications based on the contact information.

11. The contact information is accessed via a Query screen and clicking the Contacts button.

12. This opens a new window that displays the name, phone # & address of the person who made the submission.

13. How to update the Contact information
Contact information is updated by your BA USA (User Security Administrator).
See Registry Training Module 2.4 Manage User ID and Access. (Available to BA USA’s only).

14. Log in under the USA ID and Select Manage User ID and Access.

15. Enter User ID or use the Select button to lookup a user. Then Click Go

16. This opens the personal information for the user
This opens the personal information for the user. Once updated Click Submit.

17. 2. DOE Update DOE Oil Business Unit (Oil/APMC) Report Enhancements.
DOE Provisional Assessments.
DOE Oil Business Unit (Oil/APMC) Report Enhancements.
Update on Reports now available in the Registry
Potential uses for New or Updated Oil Report(s)

18. Provisional Assessments
Billing Period
Original PA
Remaining PA from Original PA Charge
October 2002
$254,500,000
2003 Average
$31,000,000
2004 Average
$6,900,000
January/05
$2,573,355
$32,478
February/05
$2,672,278
$76,037
March/05
$17,320,857
$99,200
April/05
$3,199,742
$86,825
May/05
$4,029,261
$481,292
June/05
$3,461,753

19. Date Available in Registry
Updated Oil/APMC Reports Available
Location & Report Name
Date Available in Registry
CSV
PDF
TXT
Ministry Invoices & Statements
Crude Oil Crown Royalty Statements
June 29, 2005
NEW 
Royalty Confirmation Report
July 22, 2005
Statements of Royalty Adjustments and Transportation Allowances
July 25, 2005
Certification Statements
August 2, 2005
APMC/Operator/DOE Reconciliation Report
August 3, 2005
ORBIS Wells in Programs Report
TBA
Royalty Program Letters (Approvals/Terminations)
Bulletin Board – Documents – Ministry of Energy
Third Tier Pool Listing
July 18, 2005

20. Potential Uses for New or Updated Oil Reports
The Third Tier Pool Listing:
The listing is updated weekly.
It is considered public information thus it is on the website not in your BA’s Ministry Invoices & Statements section of the Registry.
Helps Industry determine if an oil well will qualify for 3rd tier royalty rates. If your well is producing from a pool on this listing it should qualify for the reduced 3rd tier royalty rate.

21. Potential Uses for New or Updated Oil Reports
Certification Statements:
Letters informing Operators/Licensees regarding the Vintage (new, old, 3rd tier) for royalty calculations.
It is considered confidential information thus it is in your BA’s Ministry Invoices & Statements section of the Registry.
These were previously mailed and the expectation is that this method of communicating will get the information to the production accountant faster.

22. Potential Uses for New or Updated Oil Reports
APMC/Operator/DOE Reconciliation Report:
Identifies the variances between the DOE oil royalty calculated volumes and the volumes delivered to the APMC.
The new CSV format allows for sorting and filtering of the data which allows production accountants to better analyze and focus on the largest problems first.

23. Potential Uses for New or Updated Oil Reports
Use the dropdown to select the report format you wish and then Click download

24. Potential Uses for New or Updated Oil Reports
Clicking Open will load the file onto an Excel spreadsheet.

25. Potential Uses for New or Updated Oil Reports
Above is the original sort by Delivering Facility. Below the data is sorted by the Difference. On the Excel menu bar select Data – Sort and choose the appropriate column to sort by

26. Potential Uses for New or Updated Oil Reports
On the Excel menu bar select Data – Filter – Auto Filter. This adds filters to each column which you can then use to limit the data that is displayed. Below the filter was used to select a single delivering facility.

27. 3. EUB Update Reporting Error Rates.
EUB Compliance Assurance - Enforcement Directive 019.

28. Reporting Error Rates 2005-04 2005-05 2005-06 2005-07
# Operators Invoiced 64 56 69
# Chargeable Errors
289
348
136
309
$ invoiced
$46,100
$45,200
$24,800
$47,300
# Appeals 22 17 8
# Granted 21 15
Net $
$31,600
$29,400
$22,700

29. Reporting Error Rates 2005-04 2005-05 2005-06 2005-07 Missing Well 140
211 32
192
Metering diff 30 42 22
Imbalance 54 40 34
Missing Facility 43 26 28 41
'P' Pending 15 8 9
Other 7 12 1
Total
289
348
136
309

30. Compliance Assurance Initiative (CAI)

31. Background
1997:
Information, Collection and Dissemination Enforcement Policy (Ladder) for Production, Injection and Disposition.
1999:
(IL) 99-4 EUB Enforcement process, Generic Enforcement Ladder and Field Surveillance Enforcement Ladder.
Stakeholder feedback indicated further improvements to the EUB’s enforcement approach was required.

32. Background 2004 – Board Direction:
Risk based, Common & Consistent Process
Simplify, Remove Automatic Escalation.
2005:
Draft Directive issued for stakeholder review and feedback
Directive 019 EUB Compliance Assurance - Enforcement issued – available on EUB web site.

33. Objectives
Develop simplified and proactive approach to Compliance Assurance:
Increase focus on: Information, Education, Prevention.
Deliver new Enforcement Directive and Risk Based process.
Maintain and/or improve overall industry compliance rates.

34. Objectives Handle non-compliance events consistently and fairly.
Measure and report compliance performance of Industry.
Support EUB strategic direction and compliance goals.

35. Risk Assessment
Each requirement will have an associated Low or High Risk rating based on:
Health and safety,
Environment impact,
Conservation, and
Stakeholder confidence in the regulatory process.
All requirements (business rules) for Monthly Volumetric Reporting fall into the stakeholder confidence in regulatory process and therefore have been assessed a Low Risk rating.

36. Timelines
Effective January 1, 2006 Directive 019: EUB Compliance Assurance – Enforcement replaces all current EUB Enforcement Ladders.
Bulletin identifies all EUB documents and their respective sections that are superseded by Directive 019.
Compliance not achieved by December 31, 2005 will continue under Directive 019.

37. Monthly Volumetric Reporting
Current Escalation Process
Revised Monthly Volumetric Reporting for Low Risk Non-compliance
Level
Approximate
Time to the
Next Level
EUB Action
Next Notice
Level 1
30 days
Invoice =
1st Notice of Low Risk
Non-compliance
Warning
PA Manager Letter
2nd Notice of Low Risk
Low Risk Enforcement
Level 2
VP Letter

38. Monthly Volumetric Reporting
Current Escalation Process
Revised Monthly Volumetric Reporting for Low Risk
Non-compliance
Level
Approximate
Time to the
Next Level
EUB Action
Next Low Risk Enforcement
Level 3
15 days
EUB Follow-up
Data discrepancies and missing data not corrected EUB connect with company Notify EUB’s Corporate Compliance Group =
No automatic escalation
EUB connect with company either by phone call or a face-to-face meeting to discuss the situation. As necessary may lead to:
EUB Senior Staff and Corporate Compliance Group to take action to implement appropriate enforcement consequences.
Level 4
Enforcement Consequences
  Enforcement Consequences

39. Monthly Volumetric Reporting
Process consistent with previous discussions with the Industry Benefits Committee (IBC).
More detailed information being presented to the IBC on September 27, 2005.
More information specific to Monthly Volumetric Reporting process will be available mid October.

40. 4. Industry Registry Team Update
Industry Registry Planning for 2005/06.
Consultation Process
Industry Benefits Committee/ Industry Registry Team Priorities
Training and Support.

41. Industry Registry Planning for 2005/06 -Consultation Process
Industry-Registry governance document describes consultation process to identify/ gain approval for:
IBC/ IRT Focus Items
IRT Staffing and Funding Approach.
This document is available on request.

42. Industry Registry Planning for 2005/06 -Consultation Process
IBC generates Focus Item list.
IBC reps “rate” (on scale of 0-5) the value of each item to their companies.
IBC reviews ratings and averages, and approves “consensus comments” and recommendations.
CAPP Accounting Committee/ Industry Consultation Group review ratings and recommendations.
Above recommendations are presented to the CAPP Fiscal Executive Policy Group and SEPAC Finance Committee for review and endorsement.
Funding recommendations must be approved by CAPP Board of Governors and SEPAC Board of Directors.

43. Industry Registry Planning for 2005/06 -Consultation Process
CAPP/SEPAC endorsement of enhancement priorities is approval to pursue the initiative within the Industry and Registry protocol processes:
Business cases/ further consultation and approvals are required to proceed.
A number of initiatives require funding from DOE or EUB, and must align with their priorities as well.
Priorities identified have strong Industry support on average. Individual company perspectives differ.
Items listed in the following slides were endorsed by CAPP Fiscal EPG for further work by the IRT/ IBC.

44. Industry’s Registry Priorities for 2005/06
Initiative
Industry Rating
Value / Support
Base IRT (Testing, Training, Industry Support, Change Management, Promote Initiatives of benefit to Industry, smaller enhancement projects)
V. High / Strong
GCA (currently in development) BC
Sask. (Likely contingent on BC)
High / Strong
Pipeline Splits
Current Month Oil Crown Estimator
High / Moderate
Large-small co split
Forecast Oil Crown Estimator
Industry not in agreement that current forecasts are inaccurate/problematic.
Med / Moderate
Proposed only if alternative is penalties

45. Industry’s Registry Priorities for 2006
Initiative
Industry Rating
Value / Support
EUB Audit Matrix
High / Strong
RMF2 (Royalty Reassignment)
Production Entities
Condensate Statements
Lower / Strong
Greenhouse Gas Reporting
(Research common approach)
Med. / Mixed
Daytime running of all reports
EUB Dir.13 report
V. High / Strong

46. Thank-you
The IRT appreciates the support consistently demonstrated by the IBC, Industry Consultation Group, CAPP and SEPAC.
Our role is to support Industry in maximizing value captured from the Registry. Let us know how we can help.

47. Training and Support
The IRT continues to be available to help you in working most efficiently with the Registry.
We will come to your “shop” and target a session to meet your needs.
Contact any of the IRT staff to arrange.

48. Registry Training System
The Registry Steering Committee have endorsed a recommendation made by the Training Coordinator and the Industry Registry Manager to discontinue the Registry Training System “Free Starter” Package, and provide the “Comprehensive” package to all users at no cost, effective immediately.
This change will be rolled out in the next couple of months, with communication to each user explaining their new access.
New users requesting training system access will be provided the “Comprehensive” Package. The Registry website under Training will be updated to reflect this.
Reminder: If anyone requires a reset of their training profile password – contact the Service Desk at

49. Questions