Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byNoel Gibbs Modified over 6 years ago
1
Using Dynamic PCF to improve the capacity of VoIP traffic in IEEE 802
Using Dynamic PCF to improve the capacity of VoIP traffic in IEEE Networks Takehiro Kawata (NTT, Japan) Sangho Shin, Andrea G. Forte, Henning Schulzrinne Dept of Computer Science Columbia University New York, NY
2
Motivation VoIP in wireless networks WIFI phone, VoIP clients for PDAs
Limited capacity 802.11a/b/g: nowhere close to 11 Mb/s 54 Mb/s 802.11b/g: only 3 non-interfering channels limited AP count Need to support many simultaneous calls stadium concert conventions
3
Outline Medium access control (MAC) in IEEE 802.11 LANs
Theoretical capacity of VoIP in IEEE LANs Modified MAC protocol: DPCF Simulation and results Conclusions
4
MAC Protocol in IEEE 802.11 Distributed Coordination Function (DCF)
Default MAC protocol Contention Window medium busy DIFS CSMA/CA backoff Next frame defer access Slot Backoff Slots RTS CTS DATA ACK SIFS DIFS CW Virtual carrier sense mechanism (four-way handshake) RTS: Request To Send, CTS: Clear To Send
5
MAC Protocol in IEEE 802.11 Point Coordination Function (PCF)
For real time traffic Supports QoS (rudimentary) Optional, usually not implemented commercially Contention Free Repetition Interval (Super Frame) Contention Free Period (CFP) Contention Period (CP) PIFS SIFS SIFS SIFS SIFS SIFS SIFS DCF Beacon D1+poll D2+Ack +poll poll CF-End U1+ACK U2+ACK Null SIFS < PIFS < DIFS
6
Theoretical Capacity for VoIP
DCF vs. PCF VBR (with silence suppression) = CBR / Active Ratio (3.8)
7
PCF Problems Waste of polls VoIP traffic with Silence Suppression
Talking Period Mutual Silence Period Listening Period poll poll poll poll poll poll 1 1 1 1 1 1 Various packetization intervals Data Data Data Null Null Null ACK ACK ACK Node 1: 10 ms, Node 2: 20 ms, AP: 10 ms PCF intervals 10 ms AP poll poll poll poll poll poll poll poll poll poll poll poll poll poll poll poll 1 2 1 Null 1 2 1 Null 1 2 1 Null 1 2 1 Null
8
PCF Problems – synchronization
Synchronization between polls and data Node side App CFP CP poll poll poll poll poll MAC Null Null AP side CFP CP CFP CP 5 6 7 5 6 7 MAC Polling time Packet generation time 1 2 3 4 Polling time 1 2 3 4 Null Null
9
Our Proposal: Dynamic PCF
Classification of traffic Real-time traffic (VoIP) Use CFP, also CP Best effort traffic Use only CP MAC 1 CFP CP Polling List 3 8 poll 1 poll 3 5 7 9
10
Dynamic PCF Dynamic Polling List Store only “active” nodes
Queue 5 6 7 7 Polling List 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 PCF 6 CFP CP CFP CP 5 1 3 8 6 5 Null ACK 2 4 7 5 1 3 2 4 Null 6 7 8 5 Null ACK MAC Polling List 1 3 8 DPCF CFP CP CFP CP 1 3 8 poll 6 5 ACK 7 1 3 8 poll 6 5 ACK 7 MAC
11
Dynamic PCF More data field
Set “more data field” when there are more than two packets to send in the queue Solution to the various packetization intervals problem Node 1 : 10 ms, Node 2 : 20 ms, AP: 20 ms PCF Intervals 20 ms poll poll 1 poll +more poll 2 1 poll 1 poll 2 +more AP 1 2
12
Dynamic PCF More data field Solution to the synchronization problem
Node side poll Null poll +more poll App CFP CP poll poll MAC Fail to send
13
Dynamic PCF Synchronization problem in DPCF AP side PCF MAC DPCF MAC
CFP CP PCF 7 8 MAC 1 2 5 Polling time CFP CP DPCF 7 8 MAC Polling time 1 2 5
14
Dynamic PCF (DPCF2) Solution to the Synchronization problem
Allow VoIP packets to be sent in CP only when there are more than two VoIP packets in queue poll CFP CP App MAC PCF App MAC DPCF CFP CP poll Null poll +more poll
15
Simulations QualNet Simulator Topology : Wireless to Wireless
Commercial simulator, evaluation available Easy graphical + text interface Topology : Wireless to Wireless MN1 MN5 MN2 MN6 AP MN3 MN7 MN4 MN8
16
Simulations VoIP traffic model ITU-T P59 Our Model 0.5 1.0 1.5 0.23
0.4 0.9 1.3 Parameter Duration (s) Rate (%) Talk-spurt 1.004 38.53 Pause 1.587 61.47 Double-Talk 0.228 6.59 Mutual Silence 0.508 22.48 Duration (s) Rate (%) 1.004 38.53 1.587 61.47 0.508 22.48
17
Simulations Measuring the capacity of VoIP
Acceptable delay threshold : 60msec
18
Simulation Results
19
Simulation Results Delay and throughput with FTP traffic
DCF (30 nodes)
20
Simulation Results Delay and throughput with FTP traffic
PCF (30 nodes)
21
Simulation Results Delay and throughput with FTP traffic
DPCF (30 nodes)
22
Simulation Results Delay and throughput with FTP traffic
DPCF2 (30 nodes)
23
Simulation Results Delay and throughput with FTP traffic
DPCF (36 nodes)
24
Simulation Results Delay and throughput with FTP traffic
DPCF2 (36 nodes)
25
Conclusions Dynamic PCF Improved VoIP capacity by 20%
When mixed with FTP traffic, higher throughput and lower delay MAC Scheme DCF PCF DPCF Capacity (# of calls) 30 36
Similar presentations
© 2024 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.